三种综合评价(评分)方法在体育评价中的比较研究
- 中山大学 体育部,广州,510275 ; 浙江工商大学 体育部,杭州,310118
摘要: 为将科学合理、简便易行的先进评价方法引入体育评价,对3种体育综合评价方法进行了比较研究.研究显示:3种综合评分方法均科学合理(信度高)、简便易行(效度好),且对研究样本的计算结果基本趋向一致,可以为体育实践中的教学、训练、竞赛、管理、健身、科研评价、对比、衡量、判断、分类、预测和决策的量化工作提供标准和调控依据.
Comparative Research on Three Comprehensive Evaluation (Grading) Methods in Evaluation of Physical Education
- 中山大学 体育部,广州,510275 ; 浙江工商大学 体育部,杭州,310118
Keywords:
- 经验定性 /
- 科学定量 /
- 综合评价 /
- 比较研究
Abstract: Various methods, scientific and reasonable, simple and feasible, have been introduced into the evaluation of sports, with three sports comprehensive evaluation method for physical education stated in this article to lead to the discard of the disadvantage of assessments that rely on the daily experience, and thus rise to the height of scientific quantitative evaluation, moreover, accomplishing the purpose of macro-control and micro-analysis.They also have great profound strategic significance for better guiding the evaluation of physical education practice, deepening the education reform, and cultivating KAQ (knowledge, ability, quality) talents who can participate in the international competition.The results show that three comprehensive evaluation methods are scientific and reasonable, high reliability, easy (validity), and the basic trend is consistent, the calculation results of the sample provides the basis of the standard and regulation for quantitative work in physical education, mass sports, training, competition, management, health, scientific research evaluation, contrast, measure, judgment, classification, prediction and decision.
下载: