讨论方式对目击证人记忆的影响

姚海娟,刘馨怡,陈美伶,黄如禹

doi:10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.10.011

西南师范大学学报(自然科学版)

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
	姓名不能为空！
邮箱
	邮箱不能为空！非法的邮箱地址。
手机号码
	电话不能为空！请输入有效手机号!
标题
	标题不能为空！
留言内容
	内容不能为空！
验证码
	验证码不能为空！验证码错误！

讨论方式对目击证人记忆的影响

姚海娟,刘馨怡,陈美伶,黄如禹. 讨论方式对目击证人记忆的影响[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 43(10): 50-55. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.10.011

引用本文:

姚海娟,刘馨怡,陈美伶,黄如禹. 讨论方式对目击证人记忆的影响[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 43(10): 50-55. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.10.011

YAO Hai-juan, LIU Xin-yi, CHEN Mei-ling, HUANG Ru-yu. On Influence of Type of Discussion on Eyewitness Memory[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 43(10): 50-55. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.10.011

Citation:

YAO Hai-juan, LIU Xin-yi, CHEN Mei-ling, HUANG Ru-yu. On Influence of Type of Discussion on Eyewitness Memory[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 43(10): 50-55. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.10.011

讨论方式对目击证人记忆的影响

姚海娟,刘馨怡,陈美伶,黄如禹

天津商业大学法学院心理学系, 天津 300134

On Influence of Type of Discussion on Eyewitness Memory

YAO Hai-juan, LIU Xin-yi, CHEN Mei-ling, HUANG Ru-yu

Department of Psychology, School of Law, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China

摘要: 以54名大学生为被试，采用模拟事件范式，创设共同目击者讨论、问题讨论和无讨论3种讨论方式，探讨讨论方式对目击证人自由回忆不同类型案件信息的效果、信心及其确信度的影响.研究显示：相比细节信息，被试对动作信息的回忆正确率、信心更高，校准和信心准确率得分更低；相比问题讨论组和无讨论组，共同目击者讨论组被试回忆的信息总数和正确数更高.表明目击证人对动作信息的记忆和确信度好于对细节信息的记忆，对细节信息的记忆过于自信；共同目击者讨论仅增加了自由回忆的信息量，并没有提高自由回忆效果.
- 目击证人 /
- 共同目击者讨论 /
- 记忆 /
- 确信度 /
- 动作信息
Abstract: 54 undergraduate students have participated in the current study, and they were randomly allocated to one of three conditions:co-witness discussion, problem discussion and control. After they watched the criminal film, the first two with five discussions each during three weeks. Then all participants recalled the event freely, and judged their confidence. By means of some indicators such as proportion correct, confidence, et al, the study investigated the effect of the type of discussion on eyewitness memory and confidence accuracy. The results show that eyewitness proportion correct and confidence of action information are significantly higher than detail information, and the score of calibration and over/under confidence are significantly lower than detail information; compared with problem discussion and control condition, co-witness discussion group recalls more items and more correct items. The result indicates that eyewitness memory and confidence accuracy of action information are better than detail information, and they show overconfident in detail information; co-witness discussion doesn't improve the effect of eyewitness free recall, but only increases the amount of memory.
- eyewitness /
- co-witness discussion /
- memory /
- confidence accuracy /
- action information .

[1]	YARMEY A D.Expert testimony:Does Eyewitness Memory Research have Probative Value for the Courts[J].Canadian Psychology,2001,42(2):92-100.
[2]	LINDSAY D S.Misleading Suggestions Can Impair Eyewitnesses' Ability to Remember Event Details[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory and Cognition,1990,16(6):1077-1083.
[3]	PRINCIPLE G F,SCHINDEWOLF E.Natural Conversations as A Source of False Memories in Children:Implications for the Testimony of Young Witnesses[J].Developmental Review,2012,32(3):205-223.
[4]	曹海丽, 陈妍, 杜巍.共同目击者的错误记忆[J].大庆师范学院学报, 2011,31(2):133-136.
[5]	曹海丽, 张明.警告对共同目击者讨论后产生的错误记忆的影响[J].心理与行为研究, 2012,10(2):88-91.
[6]	PERLMUTTER H V.Group Memory of Meaningful Material[J].Journal of Psychology,1953,35(2):361-370.
[7]	YARMEY A D,MORRIS S.The Effects of Discussion on Eyewitness Memory[J].Journal of Applied Social Psychology,1998,28(17):1637-1648.
[8]	CLARK N K,STEPHENSON G M,KNIVETON B H.Social Remembering:Quantitative Aspects of Individual and Collaborative Remembering by Police Officers and Students[J].British Journal of Psychology,1990,81(1):73-94.
[9]	DALTON A L,DANEMAN M.Suggestibility to Central and Peripheral Misinformation[J].Memory,2006,14(4):486-501.
[10]	IBABE I,SPORER S L.How You Ask is What You Get:On the Influence of Question form on Accuracy and Confidence[J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology,2004,18(6):711-726.
[11]	WIXTED J T,READ J D,LINDSAY D S.The Effect of Retention Interval on the Eyewitness Identification Confidence-Accuracy Relationship[J].Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,2016,5(2):192-203.
[12]	WELLS G L,MEMON A,PENROD S D.Eyewitness Evidence:Improving Its Probative Value[J].Psychological Science in the Public Interest,2006,7(2):45-75.
[13]	TENNEY E R,MACCOUN R J,SPELLMAN B A,et al.Calibrations Trumps Confidence as a Basis for Witness Credibility[J].Psychological Science,2007,18(1):46-50.
[14]	SARWAR F,ALLWOOD C M,INNES-KER J A.Effects of Different Types of Forensic Information on Eyewitness' Memory and Confidence Accuracy[J].The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context,2014,6(1):17-27.
[15]	WIXTED J T, READ J D, LINDSAY D S.The Effect of Retention Interval on the Eyewitness Identification Confidence-Accuracy Relationship[J].Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2016,5(2):192-203.
[16]	SAUER J D,BREWER D N,WELLS G L.Is There a Magical Time Boundary for Diagnosing Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in Sequential Line-ups?[J].Legal & Criminological Psychology,2011,13(1):123-135.
[17]	JAMES H S,JOSHUA B,RACHEL W.Mental Time Travel Ability and the Mental Reinstatement of Context for Crime Witnesses[J].Consciousness and Cognition,2017,48:1-10.
[18]	RUSSELL A W,SCHOBER M F.How Beliefs About a Partner's Goals Affect Referring in Goal-discrepant Conversation[J].Discourse Process,1999,27(1):530-541.
[19]	郝鑫, 杨文静, 张庆林.生活经验与工作记忆容量对条件推理的影响[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(6):138-144.
[20]	吕厚超, 黄希庭, 李敏.自传体记忆中时间标记研究述评[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2000,25(1):98-102.
[21]	STONE C B,LUMINET O,HIRST W.Induced Forgetting and Reduced Confidence in Our Personal Past? The Consequences of Selectively Retrieving Emotional Autobiographical Memories[J].Acta Psychologica,2013,144(2):250-257.
[22]	GABBERT F,MEMON A,ALLAN K,et al.Say It to My Face:Examining the Effects of Socially Encountered Misinformation[J].Legal & Criminological Psychology,2004,9(2):215-227.

计量

文章访问数: 832
HTML全文浏览数: 568
PDF下载数: 80
施引文献: 0

讨论方式对目击证人记忆的影响

姚海娟,刘馨怡,陈美伶,黄如禹

天津商业大学法学院心理学系, 天津 300134

收稿日期: 2018-01-09

关键词:

摘要: 以54名大学生为被试，采用模拟事件范式，创设共同目击者讨论、问题讨论和无讨论3种讨论方式，探讨讨论方式对目击证人自由回忆不同类型案件信息的效果、信心及其确信度的影响.研究显示：相比细节信息，被试对动作信息的回忆正确率、信心更高，校准和信心准确率得分更低；相比问题讨论组和无讨论组，共同目击者讨论组被试回忆的信息总数和正确数更高.表明目击证人对动作信息的记忆和确信度好于对细节信息的记忆，对细节信息的记忆过于自信；共同目击者讨论仅增加了自由回忆的信息量，并没有提高自由回忆效果.

English Abstract

On Influence of Type of Discussion on Eyewitness Memory

天津商业大学法学院心理学系, 天津 300134

Received Date: 2018-01-09

Keywords:

Abstract: 54 undergraduate students have participated in the current study, and they were randomly allocated to one of three conditions:co-witness discussion, problem discussion and control. After they watched the criminal film, the first two with five discussions each during three weeks. Then all participants recalled the event freely, and judged their confidence. By means of some indicators such as proportion correct, confidence, et al, the study investigated the effect of the type of discussion on eyewitness memory and confidence accuracy. The results show that eyewitness proportion correct and confidence of action information are significantly higher than detail information, and the score of calibration and over/under confidence are significantly lower than detail information; compared with problem discussion and control condition, co-witness discussion group recalls more items and more correct items. The result indicates that eyewitness memory and confidence accuracy of action information are better than detail information, and they show overconfident in detail information; co-witness discussion doesn't improve the effect of eyewitness free recall, but only increases the amount of memory.