黏虫板不同使用方式对槟榔园害虫的诱杀效果

吕朝军; 钟宝珠; 李朝绪; 陈拓

doi:10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.009

植物医学

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
	姓名不能为空！
邮箱
	邮箱不能为空！非法的邮箱地址。
手机号码
	电话不能为空！请输入有效手机号!
标题
	标题不能为空！
留言内容
	内容不能为空！
验证码
	验证码不能为空！验证码错误！

黏虫板不同使用方式对槟榔园害虫的诱杀效果

, , ,

吕朝军, 钟宝珠, 李朝绪, 等. 黏虫板不同使用方式对槟榔园害虫的诱杀效果[J]. 植物医学, 2022, (2): 59-63. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.009

引用本文:

吕朝军, 钟宝珠, 李朝绪, 等. 黏虫板不同使用方式对槟榔园害虫的诱杀效果[J]. 植物医学, 2022, (2): 59-63. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.009

LYU Chaojun, ZHONG Baozhu, LI Chaoxu, et al. Effect of Different Uses of Sticky Card on Trapping Pests in Areca Field[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (2): 59-63. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.009

Citation:

LYU Chaojun, ZHONG Baozhu, LI Chaoxu, et al. Effect of Different Uses of Sticky Card on Trapping Pests in Areca Field[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (2): 59-63. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.009

黏虫板不同使用方式对槟榔园害虫的诱杀效果

中国热带农业科学院椰子研究所/海南省槟榔产业工程研究中心, 海南文昌 571339

详细信息

作者简介:
吕朝军,博士,副研究员,主要从事棕榈有害生物综合防治研究. .

中图分类号: S476;S792.91

Effect of Different Uses of Sticky Card on Trapping Pests in Areca Field

Coconut Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences Engineering Research Center of Arecanut Industry, Wenchang Hainan 571339, China

摘要: 为推广普及槟榔园刺吸式害虫的物理防治技术,评价了黄色黏虫板不同悬挂高度与密度对害虫的控制效果.结果表明,悬挂位置影响黏虫板诱集效果,以株高约7 m槟榔为试验对象,悬挂于树冠部(树冠倒数1~3片叶的叶柄部)效果最佳,单张黏虫板诱集到的蓟马、叶蝉、粉虱和蚜虫平均虫口数分别为7.84头、 6.52头、 11.84头和6.76头;而悬挂于树干中部(距地3~4 m)和下部(距地1.5~2 m)处理的诱集效果较差,其中下部悬挂处理组平均虫口数分别仅为2.80头、 1.76头、 4.16头和2.48头.不同悬挂密度试验结果发现,以1片/株、 1片/2株和1片/3株效果较好,以诱捕到的蓟马数量为例,此3个处理诱集到的平均总虫口数量分别为41.33头、 42.33头和37.67头,从诱捕效果和使用成本等方面综合考虑,以1片/3株效果最佳.综上,采用黄色黏虫板防治槟榔园刺吸式害虫时,以1片/3株悬挂于树冠部,可取得最佳防治效果.
- 黏虫板 /
- 槟榔园 /
- 刺吸式害虫
Abstract: In order to popularize the physical control technology for piercing-sucking pests in areca farm, effect of yellow sticky card to control pests under different hanging height and density were evaluated. The results indicated that the hanging position affected the trapping effect of sticky card. Areca tree with height of about 7 m was used as the test object, the effect of hanging on the crown of tree (in the petiole of the last 1~3 leaf from crown) was the best. The average number of thrips, leafhoppers, whiteflies and aphids trapped per sticky board was 7.84, 6.52, 11.84 and 6.76, respectively, while the effect of hanging in the middle (3~4 m from the ground) and lower part (1.5~2 m from the ground) of the trunk was poor. The average number of insects per sticky board in the lower position treatment was only 2.80, 1.76, 4.16 and 2.48, respectively. The results of different hanging density tests showed that the effects of 1 piece/plant, 1 piece/2 plant and 1 piece/3 plant were better. Taking the number of thrips trapped as an example, the average total number of insects trapped by the three treatments were 41.33, 42.33 and 37.67, respectively. Considering the trapping effect and use cost, the effect of 1 piece/3 plant was the best. In conclusion, when using yellow sticky insect board to control piercing-sucking insects in betel nut garden, the best control effect can be achieved by hanging 1 piece/3 plants under the crown of the tree.
- sticky colored card /
- areca plantation /
- piercing-sucking pests .

[1]	金书秦.关于“十三五”实现农药零增长目标的几点思考[J].农药科学与管理,2016,37(2):1-3.
[2]	张潇引,王彬力,刘超,等.不同颜色粘虫板对茶园小贯小绿叶蝉等昆虫的诱集效果比较研究[J].茶叶通讯,2021,48(4):663-670.
[3]	俞波,沈卫新,郑鹏华.一种新型粘虫板对生草梨园害虫的防治效果初探[J].中国果树,2021(9):48-51.
[4]	玄志友.应用实蝇粘虫板防控桔小实蝇[J].中国果业信息,2021,38(11):63.
[5]	彭四华,连宇阳,曾贝,等.高温季节粘虫板对百香果实蝇诱集效果评价[J].海南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,34(2):154-158.
[6]	唐庆华,宋薇薇,于少帅,等.槟榔黄化病病原研究及防控中存在的问题及展望[J].植物保护,2021,47(4):6-11.
[7]	牛晓庆,林兆威,杨德洁,等.海南万宁槟榔黄叶病毒病发生情况和症状分析[J].热带作物学报,2021,42(11):3073-3078.
[8]	于少帅,宋薇薇,覃伟权.海南槟榔黄化植原体分子检测及其系统发育关系研究[J].热带作物学报,2021,42(11):3066-3072.
[9]	孟秀利,宋薇薇,唐庆华,等.槟榔主要病虫害研究进展[J].热带作物学报,2021,42(11):3055-3065.
[10]	钟宝珠,吕朝军,覃伟权,等.不同种类色板与添加物协同对槟榔园害虫诱集的初步效果[J].植物保护,2020,46(5):286-289.
[11]	秦焕荣,刘珠珠,贺亚红,等.粘虫板不同颜色和悬挂高度对葡萄园绿盲蝽的诱集效果[J].中国植保导刊,2020,40(8):57-59.
[12]	徐鵾鸬,冯卫虎,晁倩林,等.不同种类粘虫板悬挂密度对茶小绿叶蝉种群数量的影响[J].茶叶学报,2019,60(3):119-121.
[13]	王玮,王胜永,李宝辉,等.粘虫板不同挂板方式对苹果绣线菊蚜诱杀效果的影响[J].中国果树,2019(5):77-81.
[14]	王崇颖.海南槟榔黄化病的发生及综合防控对策[J].中国热带农业,2019(5):29-31.
[15]	梁慧明.黏虫板在虫害防治中的应用研究[J].农家参谋,2017(21):53.
[16]	杨朴丽.不同颜色黏虫板对葡萄园绿盲蝽的诱集效果[J].中国果业信息,2014,31(4):60.
[17]	钟海英,张珏锋,陈建明,等.不同颜色粘虫板对茭白长绿飞虱的诱杀效果[J].浙江农业科学,2016,57(10):1642-1643,1652.
[18]	景瑞,阎雄飞,张鹏,等.粘虫板颜色和悬挂方式对枣飞象诱集效果的影响[J].应用昆虫学报,2021,58(6):1426-1432.
[19]	云天海,肖日新,黄文枫,等.黄色黏虫板诱杀技术在辣椒蚜虫绿色防控上的应用[J].湖北农业科学,2014,53(1):79-80.
[20]	时晓芳,白先进,谢太理,等.一年两收栽培模式下粘虫板对葡萄蓟马诱杀效果[J].西南农业学报,2017,30(12):2654-2658.
[21]	杜玉宁,黄慧玲,王晓菁,等.粘虫板在不同时间空间条件下对温室蓟马诱杀作用[J].北方园艺,2015(12):100-102.
[22]	陈强,欧丽萍,梁永游,等.黄色粘虫板与杀虫剂配合对番茄白粉虱的控制作用研究[J].安徽农业科学,2013,41(22):9321-9323.

计量

文章访问数: 201
HTML全文浏览数: 189
PDF下载数: 66
施引文献: 0

黏虫板不同使用方式对槟榔园害虫的诱杀效果

作者简介: 吕朝军,博士,副研究员,主要从事棕榈有害生物综合防治研究.
中国热带农业科学院椰子研究所/海南省槟榔产业工程研究中心, 海南文昌 571339

收稿日期: 2022-01-10

基金项目:

关键词:

黏虫板 /
槟榔园 /
刺吸式害虫

摘要: 为推广普及槟榔园刺吸式害虫的物理防治技术,评价了黄色黏虫板不同悬挂高度与密度对害虫的控制效果.结果表明,悬挂位置影响黏虫板诱集效果,以株高约7 m槟榔为试验对象,悬挂于树冠部(树冠倒数1~3片叶的叶柄部)效果最佳,单张黏虫板诱集到的蓟马、叶蝉、粉虱和蚜虫平均虫口数分别为7.84头、 6.52头、 11.84头和6.76头;而悬挂于树干中部(距地3~4 m)和下部(距地1.5~2 m)处理的诱集效果较差,其中下部悬挂处理组平均虫口数分别仅为2.80头、 1.76头、 4.16头和2.48头.不同悬挂密度试验结果发现,以1片/株、 1片/2株和1片/3株效果较好,以诱捕到的蓟马数量为例,此3个处理诱集到的平均总虫口数量分别为41.33头、 42.33头和37.67头,从诱捕效果和使用成本等方面综合考虑,以1片/3株效果最佳.综上,采用黄色黏虫板防治槟榔园刺吸式害虫时,以1片/3株悬挂于树冠部,可取得最佳防治效果.

English Abstract

Effect of Different Uses of Sticky Card on Trapping Pests in Areca Field

中国热带农业科学院椰子研究所/海南省槟榔产业工程研究中心, 海南文昌 571339

Received Date: 2022-01-10

Keywords:

黏虫板 /
槟榔园 /
刺吸式害虫

Abstract: In order to popularize the physical control technology for piercing-sucking pests in areca farm, effect of yellow sticky card to control pests under different hanging height and density were evaluated. The results indicated that the hanging position affected the trapping effect of sticky card. Areca tree with height of about 7 m was used as the test object, the effect of hanging on the crown of tree (in the petiole of the last 1~3 leaf from crown) was the best. The average number of thrips, leafhoppers, whiteflies and aphids trapped per sticky board was 7.84, 6.52, 11.84 and 6.76, respectively, while the effect of hanging in the middle (3~4 m from the ground) and lower part (1.5~2 m from the ground) of the trunk was poor. The average number of insects per sticky board in the lower position treatment was only 2.80, 1.76, 4.16 and 2.48, respectively. The results of different hanging density tests showed that the effects of 1 piece/plant, 1 piece/2 plant and 1 piece/3 plant were better. Taking the number of thrips trapped as an example, the average total number of insects trapped by the three treatments were 41.33, 42.33 and 37.67, respectively. Considering the trapping effect and use cost, the effect of 1 piece/3 plant was the best. In conclusion, when using yellow sticky insect board to control piercing-sucking insects in betel nut garden, the best control effect can be achieved by hanging 1 piece/3 plants under the crown of the tree.