不同种子处理药剂对水稻病虫害的防控效果初探

吴翠翠; 吴小兵; 袁红银; 蒋明; 王学平; 顾庆红

doi:10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.011

植物医学

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
	姓名不能为空！
邮箱
	邮箱不能为空！非法的邮箱地址。
手机号码
	电话不能为空！请输入有效手机号!
标题
	标题不能为空！
留言内容
	内容不能为空！
验证码
	验证码不能为空！验证码错误！

不同种子处理药剂对水稻病虫害的防控效果初探

, , , , ,

吴翠翠, 吴小兵, 袁红银, 等. 不同种子处理药剂对水稻病虫害的防控效果初探[J]. 植物医学, 2022, (2): 70-76. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.011

引用本文:

吴翠翠, 吴小兵, 袁红银, 等. 不同种子处理药剂对水稻病虫害的防控效果初探[J]. 植物医学, 2022, (2): 70-76. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.011

WU Cuicui, WU Xiaobing, YUAN Hongyin, et al. Preliminary Study on the Control Effect of Different Seed Treatment Agents on Rice Diseases and Insect Pests[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (2): 70-76. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.011

Citation:

WU Cuicui, WU Xiaobing, YUAN Hongyin, et al. Preliminary Study on the Control Effect of Different Seed Treatment Agents on Rice Diseases and Insect Pests[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (2): 70-76. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.011

不同种子处理药剂对水稻病虫害的防控效果初探

江苏省如皋市农业技术推广中心, 江苏如皋 226500

详细信息

作者简介:
吴翠翠,农艺师,主要从事稻麦病虫害测报及绿色防控技术推广. .

中图分类号: S482.3

Preliminary Study on the Control Effect of Different Seed Treatment Agents on Rice Diseases and Insect Pests

Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Technology Extension Center of Rugao City, Rugao Jiangsu 226500, China

摘要: 为打破农药减量控害瓶颈,寻求水稻病虫害综合防控新途径,本研究通过田间试验,明确了不同剂量、不同种类药剂复配拌种对水稻穗前病虫害的控制效果.结果表明,采用240 g/L噻呋酰胺悬浮剂40 mL或10%嘧菌酯CS 160 mL+48%噻虫胺SC 16 mL或10%三氟苯嘧啶SC 16 mL+200 g/L氯虫苯甲酰胺SC 20 mL或10%四氯虫酰胺SC 20 g药剂复配拌种处理,对水稻纹枯病和稻飞虱具有较好的控制效果,水稻破口期纹枯病的病株防效和病指防效分别为77.58%, 76.94%和78.62%, 77.24%,稻飞虱的防治效果分别为80.7%和85.96%,对稻纵卷叶螟防控效果一般,水稻穗期虫口防效和保叶效果分别为70.97%, 67.74%和75.07, 69.23%,且种子处理药剂对水稻生长安全,可作为一项农药减量控害技术措施大面积推广使用.
- 种子处理 /
- 水稻病虫 /
- 防控效果
Abstract: In order to break the bottleneck of pesticide reduction in pests control, and seek a new way of comprehensive prevention and control of rice diseases and insect pests, this study defined the control effect of different doses and different kinds of chemical compound of seed dressing on rice diseases and insect pests before heading through field experiments. The results showed that seed dressing with 40 mL of 240 g/L thiafuramide suspension (SC) or 160 mL of 10% azoxystrobin CS + 16 mL of 48% thiamethoxam SC or 16 mL of 10% trifluoromethylpyrimidine SC + 20 mL of 200 g/L chloramphetamine SC or 20 g of 10% tetrachloromethyl SC had a good control effect on rice sheath blight and rice planthopper. The control effects of diseased plant and disease index on rice sheath blight at boot break stage were 77.58%, 76.94% and 78.62%, 77.24%, respectively. The control effect on rice planthopper was 80.7% and 85.96%, respectively. The control effect on rice leaf roller was not significant. The control effect onpest population and leaf protection at rice panicle exsertionstage were 70.97%, 67.74%, 75.07 and 69.23%, respectively. Moreover, the seed treatment agent was safe for rice growth, and could be widely used as a technical measure for pesticide reduction.
- seed treatment /
- rice diseases and insect pests /
- prevention and control effect .

[1]	包善微,吴小兵,马宏,等.如皋市水稻病虫害绿色防控技术推广探讨[J].现代农业科技,2016(12):155-156.
[2]	吴翠翠,吴小兵,包善微,等.如皋市水稻化学农药减量控害技术集成与推广应用[J].农业科技通讯,2020(10):232-236.
[3]	吴翠翠,吴小兵,蒋明,等.如皋农药使用零增长工作现状与思考[J].农业科技通讯,2021(7):42-44.
[4]	于居龙,张国,缪康,等.氯虫苯甲酰胺拌种对稻纵卷叶螟的防治效果及安全性评价[J].农药学学报,2019,21(3):300-308.
[5]	杨红福,束兆林,陈宏州,等.20%咪鲜胺·噻唑膦·戊唑醇悬浮剂对水稻种传病害防治效果[J].农药,2018,57(7):536-538.
[6]	束兆林,缪康,吉沐祥,等.包虫清对水稻前期害虫的控制效果及安全性[J].华东昆虫学报,2005,14(1):59-64.
[7]	刘伟.22.4%氟唑菌苯胺种子处理悬浮剂对水稻纹枯病的防治效果及产量的影响[J].现代化农业,2021(10):9-10.
[8]	李千和,孙俊铭.种子处理对水稻主要病虫害控制效果及增产效果研究[J].安徽农业科学,2020,48(14):140-143.
[9]	陈伟,丁春华.0.136%赤·吲乙·芸苔可湿性粉剂对水稻农药减量应用效果分析[C]//第三十三届全国植保信息交流会暨农药械交易会.2017.
[10]	刘军,石磊,王志东.18%多·咪·福种子药剂处理剂防治机插秧水稻恶苗病试验研究[J].农业技术与装备,2015(10):16-17,21.
[11]	姚克兵,于居龙,张国,等.噻呋酰胺不同种子处理方式对水稻纹枯病的控制效应及其安全性评价[J].农学学报,2021,11(7):13-17.
[12]	杨红福,姚克兵,束兆林,等.噻呋酰胺处理种子防治水稻纹枯病试验研究[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(5):107-109,116.
[13]	张国,于居龙,束兆林,等.水稻穗前稻飞虱省力化防控技术可行性评价[J].植物保护,2019,45(3):222-229.
[14]	陶亚群,夏子健,卢锦英,等.20%三氟苯嘧啶WG对稻飞虱的防治效果[J].湖北植保,2021(3):32-34.
[15]	朱凤,程金金,张国,等.江苏水稻生产全程简约化绿色防控策略研究与应用[J].中国植保导刊,2021,41(1):94-101.
[16]	于居龙,张国,赵来成,等.机插水稻不同种子处理方式对稻纵卷叶螟的控制效果[J].作物杂志,2021(6):224-229.
[17]	谢茂成,魏琪,何佳春,等.药剂种子处理对水稻恶苗病、稻蓟马和白背飞虱的防效[J].浙江农业科学,2021,62(8):1580-1582.
[18]	何东兵,朱友理,吴佳文,等.不同药剂拌种对水稻穗前病虫害的控制效果[J].浙江农业科学,2019,60(4):601-604.
[19]	毛华方,朱龙粉,荆卫锋,等.水稻种子药剂处理综合防治多种病虫的效果[J].安徽农业科学,2003,31(3):471-472.

计量

文章访问数: 182
HTML全文浏览数: 166
PDF下载数: 110
施引文献: 0

不同种子处理药剂对水稻病虫害的防控效果初探

作者简介: 吴翠翠,农艺师,主要从事稻麦病虫害测报及绿色防控技术推广.
江苏省如皋市农业技术推广中心, 江苏如皋 226500

收稿日期: 2022-03-17

关键词:

摘要: 为打破农药减量控害瓶颈,寻求水稻病虫害综合防控新途径,本研究通过田间试验,明确了不同剂量、不同种类药剂复配拌种对水稻穗前病虫害的控制效果.结果表明,采用240 g/L噻呋酰胺悬浮剂40 mL或10%嘧菌酯CS 160 mL+48%噻虫胺SC 16 mL或10%三氟苯嘧啶SC 16 mL+200 g/L氯虫苯甲酰胺SC 20 mL或10%四氯虫酰胺SC 20 g药剂复配拌种处理,对水稻纹枯病和稻飞虱具有较好的控制效果,水稻破口期纹枯病的病株防效和病指防效分别为77.58%, 76.94%和78.62%, 77.24%,稻飞虱的防治效果分别为80.7%和85.96%,对稻纵卷叶螟防控效果一般,水稻穗期虫口防效和保叶效果分别为70.97%, 67.74%和75.07, 69.23%,且种子处理药剂对水稻生长安全,可作为一项农药减量控害技术措施大面积推广使用.

English Abstract

Preliminary Study on the Control Effect of Different Seed Treatment Agents on Rice Diseases and Insect Pests

江苏省如皋市农业技术推广中心, 江苏如皋 226500

Received Date: 2022-03-17

Keywords:

Abstract: In order to break the bottleneck of pesticide reduction in pests control, and seek a new way of comprehensive prevention and control of rice diseases and insect pests, this study defined the control effect of different doses and different kinds of chemical compound of seed dressing on rice diseases and insect pests before heading through field experiments. The results showed that seed dressing with 40 mL of 240 g/L thiafuramide suspension (SC) or 160 mL of 10% azoxystrobin CS + 16 mL of 48% thiamethoxam SC or 16 mL of 10% trifluoromethylpyrimidine SC + 20 mL of 200 g/L chloramphetamine SC or 20 g of 10% tetrachloromethyl SC had a good control effect on rice sheath blight and rice planthopper. The control effects of diseased plant and disease index on rice sheath blight at boot break stage were 77.58%, 76.94% and 78.62%, 77.24%, respectively. The control effect on rice planthopper was 80.7% and 85.96%, respectively. The control effect on rice leaf roller was not significant. The control effect onpest population and leaf protection at rice panicle exsertionstage were 70.97%, 67.74%, 75.07 and 69.23%, respectively. Moreover, the seed treatment agent was safe for rice growth, and could be widely used as a technical measure for pesticide reduction.