Effects of Different Fumigation Years of Dazomet on Tobacco Growth and Bacterial Wilt Disease
-
摘要: 土壤熏蒸措施可有效减少土壤有害微生物的数量，对土传病害起到一定的防治作用，然而不同年限熏蒸的作用效果有待进一步探索.本研究通过大田小区试验，比较棉隆连续熏蒸2年、1年和没有熏蒸的处理对烟草生长和青枯病发生的影响.研究结果表明，棉隆连续2年熏蒸处理对烟株生长的促进作用更佳，能显著提高烟株打顶期最大叶长、最大叶宽、株高，以及圆顶期烟株中部单叶鲜质量和叶绿素的相对值，对烟草青枯病具有更好的防控效果，在发病高峰期的防控效果达52.27%.研究结果揭示了棉隆不同年限熏蒸对烟草青枯病的防控作用，有望为烟草实际生产防治青枯病提供理论依据与技术支撑.Abstract: Use of soil fumigants can effectively reduce the number of harmful microorganisms in the soil, and have a certain implantation effect on soil-borne disease prevention and control measures. However, the effects of different fumigation years need to be further explored.In this study, a field experiment was conducted to compare the effects of using dazomet for two years, one year and the treatment without the fumigant on tobacco growth and bacterial wilt disease. The results showed that the treatment ofusing dazomet for two years has a better effect on the growth of tobacco plants, and can significantly increase the maximum leaf length, maximum leaf width, and plant height during the topping stage of the tobacco plant, and the fresh weight and the relative content of chlorophyll in the middle of the tobacco leaves during the dome period. It also has a better prevention and control effect on tobacco bacterial wilt, and the prevention and control effect reaches 52.27% during the peak period.The results of the study reveal the effects of different fumigation years of dazomet on the prevention and control of tobacco bacterial wilt, which is expected to provide theoretical basis and technical support for the actual tobacco production and control of bacterial wilt.
-
Key words:
- Dazomet /
- fumigation years /
- agronomic characters /
- tobacco bacterial wilt .
-
-
[1] QIAN Y L, WANG X S, WANG D Z, et al. The Detection of QTLs Controlling Bacterial Wilt Resistance in Tobacco (N. tabacum L.)[J]. Euphytica, 2013, 192(2):259-266. [2] 孔凡玉. 烟草青枯病的综合防治[J]. 烟草科技, 2003, 36(4):42-43, 48. [3] 何文寿. 设施农业中存在的土壤障碍及其对策研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2004, 36(3):235-242. [4] 毛连纲, 颜冬冬, 吴篆芳, 等. 土壤化学熏蒸效果的影响因素述评[J]. 农药, 2013, 52(8):547-551. [5] FU C H, HU B, CHANG T T, HSU W. Evaluation of Dazomet as Fumigant for the Control of Brown Root Rot Disease[J]. Pest Management Science, 2012, 68(7):959-962. [6] PRIDER J, WILLIAMS A. Using Dazomet to Reduce Broomrape Seed Banks in Soils with Low Moisture Content[J].Crop Protection, 2014, 59:43-50. [7] SLUSARSKI C, PIETR S J.Combined Application of Dazomet and Trichodermaasperellum as an Efficient Alternative to Methyl Bromide in Controlling the Soil-Borne Disease Complex of Bell Pepper[J].Crop Protection, 2009, 28:668-674. [8] 王会芳, 王三勇, 符美英, 等. 棉隆对番茄根结线虫病的防治效果[J]. 热带生物学报, 2014, 5(3):249-252. [9] 刘春艳, 王万立, 霍建飞, 等. 98%棉隆微粒剂防治黄瓜根结线虫田间药效试验[J]. 北方园艺, 2011(23):128-130. [10] 张鑫, 卜东欣, 张超, 等. 四种熏蒸剂对辣椒疫霉和南方根结线虫的毒力[J]. 植物保护学报, 2013, 40(5):463-467. [11] 田甜, 孙漫红, 李世东. 棉隆与粉红螺旋聚孢霉67-1协同防治黄瓜枯萎病的研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2014, 30(4):503-510. [12] 曹坳程, 刘晓漫, 郭美霞, 等. 作物土传病害的危害及防治技术[J]. 植物保护, 2017, 43(2):6-16. [13] 莫娟, 刘小娟, 王文慧, 等. 3种土壤消毒剂对芹菜根腐病的田间防效[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2018(9):51-53. [14] ZHANG S T, LIU X J, JIANG Q P, et al. Legacy Effects of Continuous Chloropicrin-Fumigation for 3-Years on Soil Microbial Community Composition and Metabolic Activity[J]. AMB Express, 2017, 7(1):1-11. -
计量
- 文章访问数: 486
- HTML全文浏览数: 470
- PDF下载数: 233
- 施引文献: 0
下载: