10种烟草品种（系）对烟草靶斑病的抗性分析

郭沫言; 史彩华; 李童; 汪汉成

doi:10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.05.007

植物医学

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
	姓名不能为空！
邮箱
	邮箱不能为空！非法的邮箱地址。
手机号码
	电话不能为空！请输入有效手机号!
标题
	标题不能为空！
留言内容
	内容不能为空！
验证码
	验证码不能为空！验证码错误！

10种烟草品种（系）对烟草靶斑病的抗性分析

, , ,

郭沫言, 史彩华, 李童, 等. 10种烟草品种（系）对烟草靶斑病的抗性分析[J]. 植物医学, 2022, (5): 64-70. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.05.007

引用本文:

郭沫言, 史彩华, 李童, 等. 10种烟草品种（系）对烟草靶斑病的抗性分析[J]. 植物医学, 2022, (5): 64-70. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.05.007

GUO Moyan, SHI Caihua, LI Tong, et al. Analysis of Resistance of Ten Tobacco Varieties （Lines） to Tobacco Target Spot[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (5): 64-70. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.05.007

Citation:

GUO Moyan, SHI Caihua, LI Tong, et al. Analysis of Resistance of Ten Tobacco Varieties （Lines） to Tobacco Target Spot[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (5): 64-70. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.05.007

10种烟草品种（系）对烟草靶斑病的抗性分析

1. 长江大学农学院, 湖北荆州 434025;

2. 贵州省烟草科学研究院, 贵阳 550081

详细信息

作者简介:
郭沫言,硕士研究生,主要从事植物保护学研究. .

中图分类号: S572

Analysis of Resistance of Ten Tobacco Varieties （Lines） to Tobacco Target Spot

1. College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou Hubei 434025, China;

2. Guizhou Academy of Tobacco Science, Guiyang 550081, China

摘要: 为探究烟草不同成熟度烟叶及不同烟草品种(系)对烟草靶斑病的抗性,本研究基于田间病情指数评价了“云烟87”不同成熟度(未熟、适熟和成熟)烟叶对靶斑病的抗性,并采用离体叶片法和田间病情指数评价了“云烟87”“云烟85”“云烟97”“红花大金元”“贵烟5号”“贵烟8号”“GZ36”“K326”“韭菜坪2号”和“毕纳1号”这10个烟草品种(系)对烟草靶斑病的抗性.研究结果发现,成熟叶片对靶斑病抗性最弱,病情指数为90.20,其次为适熟叶片,病情指数为66.67,而未熟叶片抗性最强,病情指数为25.00.结合室内和田间的调查结果发现,10个烟草品种(系)对烟草靶斑病表现出不同抗性,其中“韭菜坪2号”抗性最强,接菌10 d时平均病斑直径为12.38 mm,调查14 d时田间病情指数为60.00;其次为“云烟97”“云烟85”“毕纳1号”“贵烟8号”“云烟87”“红花大金元”和“GZ36”,病斑直径范围为18.00~23.00 mm;“贵烟5号”和“K326”抗性较弱,病斑直径为24.28 mm和25.91 mm, 14 d时田间病情指数分别为68.44和62.67.研究结果提示,不同成熟度烟叶抗性表现不同,不同品种烟草对烟草靶斑病表现抗性不同,可为烟草靶斑病抗性种质资源的筛选提供参考.
- 烟草 /
- 烟草靶斑病 /
- 品种抗性鉴定
Abstract: To investigate the resistance of tobacco leaf at different maturity levels and different varieties(lines) to tobacco target spot disease, the resistance of ‘Yuyan 87' tobacco leaf at different maturity levels(immature, proper mature and mature) to target spot disease was conducted by surveying of disease index in the field, and the resistance of 10 tobacco varieties(lines)(‘Yunyan 87'‘Yunyan 85'‘Yunyan 97'‘Honghuadajinyuan'‘Guiyan 5'‘Guiyan 8'‘GZ36'‘K326'‘Jiucaipin 2' and ‘Bina 1') was analyzed by using the detached leaves. The results showed that the resistance of mature leaf to the target spot was the least with a disease index of 90.20, the proper ripe leaf had better resistance with a disease index of 66.67, and immature leaf showed the strongest resistance with a disease index of 25.00. Combining the results of indoor and field surveys, we found that ten tobacco varieties(lines) showed different resistance to tobacco target spot. ‘Jiucaiping 2' presented the highest resistance with a spot diameter of 12.38 mm at 10 days after inoculation(DAI), and the field disease index of 60.00 at 14 days DAI, followed by ‘Yunyan 97'‘Yunyan 85'‘Bina 1'‘Guiyan 8'‘Yunyan 87'‘Honghuadajinyuan' and ‘GZ36' with spot diameters 18.00~23.00 mm. ‘Guiyan 5' and ‘K326' had weak resistance with a spot diameter of 24.28 mm and 25.91 mm at 10 DAI and a field disease index of 68.44 and 62.67 at 14 DAI, respectively. Tobacco leaves at different maturity presented different resistance, and different cultivars exhibited different resistance against tobacco target spot. The outcome of this study could provide some reference for screening resistant tobacco sources for breeding.
- tobacco /
- tobacco target spot /
- cultivar resistance identification .

[1]	童治军,方敦煌,陈学军,等.6个烟草重要产量相关性状的遗传分析 [J].中国烟草学报,2020,26(5):72-81.
[2]	XIA B,XU C T,XU J K,et al.First Report of Target Leaf Spot on Flue-Cured Tobacco by Rhizoctonia Solani AG-3 in Sichuan,China [J].Plant Disease,2019,103(3):581.
[3]	SHEW H D.Infection and Development of Target Spot of Flue-Cured Tobacco Caused by Thanatephorus Cucumeris [J].Plant Disease,1990,74(12):1009.
[4]	SHEW H D,MELTON T A.Tobacco Target Spot [J].Plant Disease,1995,79(1):6-11.
[5]	吴元华,王左斌,刘志恒,等.我国烟草新病害——靶斑病 [J].中国烟草学报,2006,12(6):22,51.
[6]	李明远.由丝核菌引起的蔬菜褐腐病值得关注 [J].中国蔬菜,2017(12):88-91.
[7]	SHEW H D.Rhizoctonia Leaf Spot of Flue-Cured Tobacco in North Carolina [J].Plant Disease,1985,69(10):901.
[8]	TARANTINO P.Control of Rhizoctonia Solani in a Tobacco-Float System Using Low Rates of Iprodione- and Iprodione-Resistant Strains of Gliocladium Roseum [J].Crop Protection,2007,26(8):1298-1302.
[9]	MEYER J C,WYK R J,PHILLIPS A J L.Rhizoctonia Leaf Spot of Tobacco in South Africa [J].Plant Pathology,1990,39(1):206-207.
[10]	方敦煌,肖炳光,焦芳婵,等.烟草黑胫病抗性鉴定研究现状与展望 [J].中国烟草学报,2018,24(3):130-135.
[11]	侯烁,朱承广,赵强,等.一种苗期鉴定烟草赤星病抗性的新方法 [J].中国烟草科学,2016,37(6):72-76.
[12]	李梅云,刘勇,肖炳光,等.烟草黑胫病抗性的漂浮苗鉴定方法 [J].中国烟草科学,2014,35(1):76-79.
[13]	刘勇,莫笑晗,余清,等.云南、福建、湖南烟区烟草花叶病主要病毒种类检测及黄瓜花叶病毒亚组鉴定 [J].植物病理学报,2006,36(4):310-313.
[14]	刘国祥,李媛,吕洪坤,等.重庆地区新收集烟草种质资源的鉴定评价与整理编目[J].植物遗传资源学报,2020,21(4):896-907.
[15]	焦芳婵,吴兴富,陈学军,等.我国烟草种质资源收集、鉴定及在育种上的应用[J].烟草科技,2019,52(7):108-116.
[16]	李媛,刘国祥,佟英,等.烤烟种质资源黑胫病抗性再鉴定 [J].中国烟草科学,2019,40(2):1-7.
[17]	刘国祥,邹昆晏,任民,等.77份新收集烟草种质资源的鉴定评价与整理编目 [J].植物遗传资源学报,2018,19(2):212-224.
[18]	雷丽萍,崔国民.云南烤烟生产新技术 [M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
[19]	国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.烟草病虫害分级及调查方法:GB/T 23222—2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
[20]	HOLLAND R M,CHRISTIANO R S C,GAMLIEL-ATINSKY E,et al.Distribution of Xylella Fastidiosa in Blueberry Stem and Root Sections in Relation to Disease Severity in the Field [J].Plant Disease,2014,98(4):443-447.
[21]	李松远,姚昕,涂勇.苯醚甲环唑与吡唑醚菌酯复配对石榴干腐病菌的联合毒力测定 [J].南方农业,2021,15(34):88-91.
[22]	张帅,李世雄,杨太新,等.苯醚甲环唑和吡唑醚菌酯混合物对炭疽病菌的联合毒力及药效 [J].植物保护,2013,39(6):160-163.
[23]	范子耀,王文桥,孟润杰,等.吡唑醚菌酯与苯醚甲环唑混合物对茄链格孢的联合毒力及其对马铃薯产量的影响 [J].农药学学报,2011,13(6):591-596.
[24]	唐李丽,冯文龙,熊维亮,等.我国烤烟主栽品种的研究与思考 [J].四川农业科技,2020(8):79-82,85.

计量

文章访问数: 811
HTML全文浏览数: 784
PDF下载数: 347
施引文献: 0

10种烟草品种（系）对烟草靶斑病的抗性分析

作者简介: 郭沫言,硕士研究生,主要从事植物保护学研究.
1. 长江大学农学院, 湖北荆州 434025;

2. 贵州省烟草科学研究院, 贵阳 550081

收稿日期: 2022-09-13

基金项目:

关键词:

摘要: 为探究烟草不同成熟度烟叶及不同烟草品种(系)对烟草靶斑病的抗性,本研究基于田间病情指数评价了“云烟87”不同成熟度(未熟、适熟和成熟)烟叶对靶斑病的抗性,并采用离体叶片法和田间病情指数评价了“云烟87”“云烟85”“云烟97”“红花大金元”“贵烟5号”“贵烟8号”“GZ36”“K326”“韭菜坪2号”和“毕纳1号”这10个烟草品种(系)对烟草靶斑病的抗性.研究结果发现,成熟叶片对靶斑病抗性最弱,病情指数为90.20,其次为适熟叶片,病情指数为66.67,而未熟叶片抗性最强,病情指数为25.00.结合室内和田间的调查结果发现,10个烟草品种(系)对烟草靶斑病表现出不同抗性,其中“韭菜坪2号”抗性最强,接菌10 d时平均病斑直径为12.38 mm,调查14 d时田间病情指数为60.00;其次为“云烟97”“云烟85”“毕纳1号”“贵烟8号”“云烟87”“红花大金元”和“GZ36”,病斑直径范围为18.00~23.00 mm;“贵烟5号”和“K326”抗性较弱,病斑直径为24.28 mm和25.91 mm, 14 d时田间病情指数分别为68.44和62.67.研究结果提示,不同成熟度烟叶抗性表现不同,不同品种烟草对烟草靶斑病表现抗性不同,可为烟草靶斑病抗性种质资源的筛选提供参考.

English Abstract

Analysis of Resistance of Ten Tobacco Varieties （Lines） to Tobacco Target Spot

^1,2,
¹,
^1,2,
²

1. 长江大学农学院, 湖北荆州 434025;
2. 贵州省烟草科学研究院, 贵阳 550081

Received Date: 2022-09-13

Keywords:

Abstract: To investigate the resistance of tobacco leaf at different maturity levels and different varieties(lines) to tobacco target spot disease, the resistance of ‘Yuyan 87' tobacco leaf at different maturity levels(immature, proper mature and mature) to target spot disease was conducted by surveying of disease index in the field, and the resistance of 10 tobacco varieties(lines)(‘Yunyan 87'‘Yunyan 85'‘Yunyan 97'‘Honghuadajinyuan'‘Guiyan 5'‘Guiyan 8'‘GZ36'‘K326'‘Jiucaipin 2' and ‘Bina 1') was analyzed by using the detached leaves. The results showed that the resistance of mature leaf to the target spot was the least with a disease index of 90.20, the proper ripe leaf had better resistance with a disease index of 66.67, and immature leaf showed the strongest resistance with a disease index of 25.00. Combining the results of indoor and field surveys, we found that ten tobacco varieties(lines) showed different resistance to tobacco target spot. ‘Jiucaiping 2' presented the highest resistance with a spot diameter of 12.38 mm at 10 days after inoculation(DAI), and the field disease index of 60.00 at 14 days DAI, followed by ‘Yunyan 97'‘Yunyan 85'‘Bina 1'‘Guiyan 8'‘Yunyan 87'‘Honghuadajinyuan' and ‘GZ36' with spot diameters 18.00~23.00 mm. ‘Guiyan 5' and ‘K326' had weak resistance with a spot diameter of 24.28 mm and 25.91 mm at 10 DAI and a field disease index of 68.44 and 62.67 at 14 DAI, respectively. Tobacco leaves at different maturity presented different resistance, and different cultivars exhibited different resistance against tobacco target spot. The outcome of this study could provide some reference for screening resistant tobacco sources for breeding.