Study on the Control Effect of Underground Fence on Gansu Zokor in Potato Field
-
摘要: 甘肃鼢鼠是一种广泛分布于黄土高原地区的地下害鼠,无冬眠和夏眠现象,食性广泛,但其活动取食范围相对比较固定,本文针对被广泛应用于农田地上害鼠防控的TBS系统原理,在甘肃鼢鼠防治中的探索研究围栏防治效果及可行性.结果表明各围栏均能减少处理区甘肃鼢鼠对马铃薯的为害,提高马铃薯产量,封闭式竹条地下围栏对甘肃鼢鼠具有较好的阻截作用,能够完全阻截甘肃鼢鼠迁入处理区取食为害,但金属网地下围栏不能完全阻截甘肃鼢鼠迁入为害.封闭式竹条地下围栏处理区甘肃鼢鼠未迁入为害,为害率为0%;带诱捕孔的开放式金属网地下围栏处理区平均受害面积1.8m2,为害率达7.2%,但诱捕孔不能诱捕甘肃鼢鼠;开放式金属网地下围栏处理区平均受害面积2.47 m2,为害率达9.87%.三者对马铃薯增产分别达33.06%,28.54%和19.73%.本研究为探索围栏系统对甘肃鼢鼠的防控提供了非常高的指导意义.Abstract: Gansu zokor is a kind of underground rodent widely distributed in the Loess Plateau. It does not hibernate in winter and summer, and has a wide range of feeding habits. However, its active feeding range is relatively fixed. In this paper, the principle of TBS system, which is widely used in the prevention and control of ground rodents in farmland, is used to explore the effect and feasibility of fence in the prevention and control of Gansu zokor. The results showed that each fence could reduce the damage of Gansu zokor to potato in the treatment area and increase the yield of potato. The closed bamboo underground fence had a good blocking effect on Gansu zokor, which could completely block the feeding damage of Gansu zokor in the treatment area, but the metal net underground fence could not completely block the migration of Gansu zokor. There was no Gansu zokor moved into the closed bamboo underground fence treatment area, and the damage rate was 0%. The average damage area in the open metal net underground fence with trapping holes treatment area was 1.8 m2, and the damage rate was 7.2%, and the trapping holes could not trap Gansu zokor. The average damage area in the open metal mesh underground fence treatment area was 2.47 m2, and the damage rate is 9.87%. The yield of potato increased by 33.06%, 28.54% and 19.73%, respectively. This study provides a very high guiding significance for exploring the fence system for the prevention and control of Gansu zokor.
-
Key words:
- Gansu zokor /
- fence /
- prevention and control .
-
-
[1] 杨再学, 金星. 贵州省农区鼠害监测结果与灾变规律分析[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2006, 25(3):197-202. [2] 蒋孟多. 小陇山天保工程区甘肃鼢鼠防治方法[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2017, 20(9):53-54. [3] 王茁. 甘肃鼢鼠的危害现状及防治措施[J]. 安徽农学通报(上半月刊), 2010, 16(7):189-190, 214. [4] 王瑾. 甘肃鼢鼠活动节律及其食性研究[D]. 延安:延安大学,2016. [5] 王小花, 刘朝辉. 宁夏南部山区鼢鼠危害现状及防治对策[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2008, 36(1):89-90. [6] 邹垚. 六盘山地区甘肃鼢鼠的遗传分化研究[D]. 延安:西北农林科技大学, 2018. [7] 王光友, 张振铎, 尹永林, 等. TBS技术防治大豆田害鼠效果[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2014, 34(11):30-33. [8] 王振坤, 戴爱梅, 郭永旺, 等. TBS技术在小麦田的控鼠试验[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2009, 29(9):29-30. [9] 王显报, 郭永旺, 蒋凡, 等. TBS技术在农田鼠害长期控制中的应用研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2011, 22(1):57-58, 61. [10] 杨再学, 郭永旺, 金星, 等. TBS技术监测及控制农田害鼠效果初报[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2012, 31(4):301-306. [11] 郭永旺, 张振铎, 李国忠, 等. 围栏陷阱(TBS)捕鼠技术对玉米田害鼠的防治效果及鼠害产量损失研究初报[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2011, 31(10):20-22. [12] 潘世昌, 李梅, 宋致书, 等. 不同安装方式TBS围栏控制农田害鼠效果比较[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2015, 35(5):27-30. [13] 袁志强, 董杰, 岳瑾, 等. 捕鼠桶尺寸对围栏陷阱系统(TBS)捕鼠效果的影响[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2017, 37(1):23-26. [14] 郑广永, 孙晓计, 李寿义. 不同形状TBS(围栏+捕鼠器)灭鼠效果试验[J]. 湖北植保, 2016(1):29-31. [15] 黄立胜, 隋晶晶, 姚丹丹, 等. TBS技术控制广东省农区害鼠的可行性研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2018, 45(5):65-70. [16] 秦治勇, 白智江, 李大庆, 等. 超大封闭式TBS围栏陷阱控制害鼠可行性研究[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2019, 39(4):63-65, 12. -
计量
- 文章访问数: 489
- HTML全文浏览数: 472
- PDF下载数: 128
- 施引文献: 0