Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2022 Volume 1 Issue 5
Article Contents

CHEN Gang, YUAN Jinge, CHAI Yunxia, et al. Predation Capacity of Different Instars of Eocanthecona furcellata Reared with Artificial Diets to Spodoptera frugiperda[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (5): 96-101. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.05.011
Citation: CHEN Gang, YUAN Jinge, CHAI Yunxia, et al. Predation Capacity of Different Instars of Eocanthecona furcellata Reared with Artificial Diets to Spodoptera frugiperda[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (5): 96-101. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.05.011

Predation Capacity of Different Instars of Eocanthecona furcellata Reared with Artificial Diets to Spodoptera frugiperda

More Information
  • Received Date: 15/07/2022
  • MSC: S435.72

  • This study aimed at evaluating the predatory ability of different instars of Eocanthecona furcellata to Spodoptera frugiperda. The predation function response was conducted under the laboratory condition to evaluate the predation ability of the 2nd to 5th instar and adults of E. furcellata againstthe 3rd instar of S. frugiperda.The results showed that the predation function response of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th instar and adults of E. furcellata on the 3rd larvae of S. frugiperda were in accordance with the HollingⅡ equation.With the maximum prey density, the daily maximum predation of E. furcellata from the 2nd instar nymph to the adult was 2.9, 6.7, 13.7, 17.3 and 15.5 individuals, respectively, and the theoretical maximum predation of corresponding stages of E. furcellata were 7.49,15.46,26.85,36.96 and 30.27 individuals, respectively, indicating that the 5th instar larvae of E. furcellata had stronger control ability than that of the other instar nymphs. This study built a valuable foundation for the mass rearing and application of E. furcellata for biological control of the fall armyworm S. frugiperda.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 林长春,王浩杰,任华东,等.叉角厉蝽生物学特性研究[J].林业科学研究,1998,11(1):89-93.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 张敏玲,卢传权.叉角厉蝽的饲养[J].昆虫天敌,1996,18(2):74-77.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 朱涤芳.叉角厉蝽生物学特性研究[J].昆虫天敌,1990,12(2):71-74.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 宫靖垚,陈科伟,温健,等.人工饲料饲养的叉角厉蝽对昆虫的捕食能力评价[J].环境昆虫学报,2019,41(3):471-478.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 谢钦铭,梁广文,罗诗,等.叉角厉蝽对绿额翠尺蛾幼虫的捕食作用的初步研究[J].江西科学,2001,19(1):21-23.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 何旭诺,冼继东,陈然,等.4种昆虫饲料对叉角厉蝽生长发育和繁殖的影响[J].环境昆虫学报,2013,35(6):799-803.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 陈然,梁广文,张拯研,等.叉角厉蝽对斜纹夜蛾的捕食功能反应[J].环境昆虫学报,2015,37(2):401-406.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 李文华,贾彩娟,陈惠平,等.叉角厉蝽对黄野螟幼虫的捕食功能反应[J].环境昆虫学报,2015,37(4):843-848.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 唐敏,邝昭琅,李子园,等.叉角厉蝽对草地贪夜蛾幼虫的捕食功能反应[J].环境昆虫学报,2019,41(5):979-985.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 姜玉英,刘杰,谢茂昌,等.2019年我国草地贪夜蛾扩散为害规律观测[J].植物保护,2019,45(6):10-19.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 姜玉英,刘杰,朱晓明.草地贪夜蛾侵入我国的发生动态和未来趋势分析[J].中国植保导刊,2019,39(2):33-35.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 王磊,陈科伟,陆永跃.我国草地贪夜蛾入侵扩张动态与发生趋势预测[J].环境昆虫学报,2019,41(4):683-694.

    Google Scholar

    [13] MALAQUIAS J B,RAMALHO F S,OMOTO C,et al.Imidacloprid Affects the Functional Response of Predator Podisus nigrispinus (Dallas) (Heteroptera:Pentatomidae) to Strains of Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E.Smith) on Bt Cotton[J].Ecotoxicology (London,England),2014,23(2):192-200.

    Google Scholar

    [14] ZANUNCIO J C,SILVA C A D,LIMA E R,et al.Predation Rate of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) Larvae with and without Defense by Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera:Pentatomidae)[J].Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology,2008,51(1):121-125.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 唐艺婷,李玉艳,刘晨曦,等.蠋蝽对草地贪夜蛾的捕食能力评价和捕食行为观察[J].植物保护,2019,45(4):65-68.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 王燕,张红梅,尹艳琼,等.蠋蝽成虫对草地贪夜蛾不同龄期幼虫的捕食能力[J].植物保护,2019,45(5):42-46.

    Google Scholar

    [17] HOLLING C S.Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism[J].The Canadian Entomologist,1959,91(7):385-398.

    Google Scholar

    [18] MILONAS P G,KONTODIMAS D C,MARTINOU A F.A Predator’s Functional Response:Influence of Prey Species and Size[J].Biological Control,2011,59(2):141-146.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 唐艺婷,王孟卿,陈红印,等.益蝽对草地贪夜蛾高龄幼虫的捕食能力评价和捕食行为观察[J].中国生物防治学报,2019,35(5):698-703.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 唐艺婷,郭义,何国玮,等.不同龄期的益蝽对粘虫的捕食功能反应[J].中国生物防治学报,2018,34(6):825-830.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 杨志浩,孟玲,李保平.虫龄对蠋蝽捕食斜纹夜蛾幼虫行为参数的影响[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(11):3376-3381.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 周集中,陈常铭.拟环纹狼蛛对褐飞虱的捕食作用及其模拟模型的研究Ⅰ.功能反应[J].生物防治通报,1986,2(1):2-9.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(494) PDF downloads(230) Cited by(0)

Access History

Predation Capacity of Different Instars of Eocanthecona furcellata Reared with Artificial Diets to Spodoptera frugiperda

Abstract: This study aimed at evaluating the predatory ability of different instars of Eocanthecona furcellata to Spodoptera frugiperda. The predation function response was conducted under the laboratory condition to evaluate the predation ability of the 2nd to 5th instar and adults of E. furcellata againstthe 3rd instar of S. frugiperda.The results showed that the predation function response of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th instar and adults of E. furcellata on the 3rd larvae of S. frugiperda were in accordance with the HollingⅡ equation.With the maximum prey density, the daily maximum predation of E. furcellata from the 2nd instar nymph to the adult was 2.9, 6.7, 13.7, 17.3 and 15.5 individuals, respectively, and the theoretical maximum predation of corresponding stages of E. furcellata were 7.49,15.46,26.85,36.96 and 30.27 individuals, respectively, indicating that the 5th instar larvae of E. furcellata had stronger control ability than that of the other instar nymphs. This study built a valuable foundation for the mass rearing and application of E. furcellata for biological control of the fall armyworm S. frugiperda.

Reference (22)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return