Search Advanced

Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2023 Volume 2 Issue 4
Article Contents
Previous Article Next Article

WU Cuicui, WU Xiaobing, TANG Qiang, et al. Evaluation of Field Control Effects of Different Chemicals on Wheat Scab and Powdery Mildew[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, (4): 47-52. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2023.04.006
Citation: WU Cuicui, WU Xiaobing, TANG Qiang, et al. Evaluation of Field Control Effects of Different Chemicals on Wheat Scab and Powdery Mildew[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, (4): 47-52. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2023.04.006
shu

Evaluation of Field Control Effects of Different Chemicals on Wheat Scab and Powdery Mildew

  • Rugao Agricultural Technology Extension Center of Jiangsu Province, Rugao Jiangsu 226500, China

More Information
  • Received Date: 17/03/2022

  • MSC: S435

  • Wheat scab and wheat powdery mildew are important diseases in wheat production. This study determined the comprehensive control effects of different fungicides on wheat scab and wheat powdery mildew through field trials. The experimental results showed that the control effect of the experimental agents on wheat scab was good, with over 90% of disease ear control effect and relative control effect. Among them, fluconazole acyl hydroxylamine had the best control effect, with over 94% of disease ear control effect and over 93% of relative control effect. Wheat powdery mildew was the best prevented and controlled by using chemicals at the initial stage of the disease. If the spread of wheat powdery mildew cannot be controlled by chemicals at the early stage of the disease in the high incidence year, 40% cyclopropazole can be used in combination with prevention and control of wheat scab at the early stage of flowering.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 吴翠翠, 吴小兵, 包善微, 等. 如皋市水稻化学农药减量控害技术集成与推广应用[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2020(10):232-236.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 吴翠翠, 吴小兵, 袁红银, 等. 不同种子处理药剂对水稻病虫害的防控效果初探[J]. 植物医学, 2022, 1(2):70-76.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 刘亚茹, 徐曾娴, 张桂英, 等. 2021年武汉市小麦赤霉病重发原因及防控对策[J]. 湖北植保, 2022(1):61-62, 65.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 马忠华, 陈云, 尹燕妮. 小麦赤霉病流行成灾原因分析及防控对策探讨[J]. 中国科学基金, 2020, 34(4):464-469.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 刁春友, 杨荣明. 2003年江苏省小麦赤霉病大流行原因分析及防治对策探讨[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2003, 31(6):65-66.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 李林华, 张杰峰, 陈蓓, 等. 2021年新丰镇小麦赤霉病和白粉病重发原因分析[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2023, 29(1):133-134, 182.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 唐玮, 张开朗, 徐东祥, 等. 江苏里下河麦区小麦白粉病的流行成因与防控对策[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2016, 22(17):87-91.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 卢飞. 甲氧基丙烯酸酯类杀菌剂对赤霉病菌DON毒素生物合成的调控作用[D]. 南京:南京农业大学.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 陈晓平, 王龙, 程晓丽. 戊唑醇、吡唑醚菌酯对小麦籽粒中DON毒素产生影响分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(7):50-53.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 陈宏州, 吴佳文, 庄义庆, 等. 不同杀菌剂对小麦赤霉病及籽粒DON毒素的控制效果[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(6):307-317.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 江苏省植物保护站. 农作物主要病虫害预测预报与防治[M]. 南京:江苏科学技术出版社, 2006:2.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 黄国洋. 农药试验技术与评价方法[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2000:7.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 陆陈红, 易红娟, 孙雪梅, 等. 多种杀菌剂对小麦白粉病防治效果比较试验[J]. 上海农业科技, 2022(3):118-119.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 张春云, 吴庭友, 张桥, 等. 不同药剂对小麦白粉病重发时的防治效果[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(24):130-131, 164.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 张海艳, 段云辉, 韩敏, 等. 不同杀菌剂对常州市金坛区小麦白粉病的防治效果试验初报[J]. 上海农业科技, 2023(1):115-118, 121.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 彭昌家, 白体坤, 冯礼斌, 等. 250 g/L丙环唑EC防治小麦条锈病和白粉病的效果探讨[J]. 农学学报, 2016, 6(2):39-43.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 吴惠秋, 刘晓娜, 杨爱国, 等. 不同复配药剂对小麦穗期病害的控害提质效果[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2023, 40(1):53-56.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 李雷雷, 蔡智勇, 范志业, 等. 防治小麦赤霉病的药剂选择[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2021, 55(6):1104-1108.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 王国兵, 李永和, 洪国保, 等. 不同药剂对小麦赤霉病的防效研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2022(21):98-101.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 毛玉帅, 段亚冰, 周明国. 琥珀酸脱氢酶抑制剂类杀菌剂抗性研究进展[J]. 农药学学报, 2022, 24(5):937-948.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 李东明, 王玉国, 徐东祥, 等. 不同小麦品种、施药时期对赤霉病、白粉病的影响[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2018(2):108-109, 114.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 周晗. "扬麦33"入选全国重大新产品[N]. 扬州日报, 2022-12-21(1).

    Google Scholar

    [23] 汤露萍, 邹利军, 王晓芸, 等. 不同药剂防治小麦赤霉病适期研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(19):106-107, 113.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(586) PDF downloads(504) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Evaluation of Field Control Effects of Different Chemicals on Wheat Scab and Powdery Mildew

  • Received Date: 17/03/2022

Abstract: Wheat scab and wheat powdery mildew are important diseases in wheat production. This study determined the comprehensive control effects of different fungicides on wheat scab and wheat powdery mildew through field trials. The experimental results showed that the control effect of the experimental agents on wheat scab was good, with over 90% of disease ear control effect and relative control effect. Among them, fluconazole acyl hydroxylamine had the best control effect, with over 94% of disease ear control effect and over 93% of relative control effect. Wheat powdery mildew was the best prevented and controlled by using chemicals at the initial stage of the disease. If the spread of wheat powdery mildew cannot be controlled by chemicals at the early stage of the disease in the high incidence year, 40% cyclopropazole can be used in combination with prevention and control of wheat scab at the early stage of flowering.

    HTML

Reference (23)

Catalog

    Copyright PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE

    Address：Journal Press of Southwest University, Beibei District, Chongqing Tel：023-68250657 E-mail：zhiwuyixue@sina.com

    Supported by:Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return