Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2024 Volume 3 Issue 1
Article Contents

XIAO Qingli, DONG Yanling, PENG Kui, et al. Composition and Diversity of Phyllospheric Bacterial Community in Tobacco Leaves Infected by Tobacco Weather Fleck[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2024, (1): 45-52. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2024.01.005
Citation: XIAO Qingli, DONG Yanling, PENG Kui, et al. Composition and Diversity of Phyllospheric Bacterial Community in Tobacco Leaves Infected by Tobacco Weather Fleck[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2024, (1): 45-52. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2024.01.005

Composition and Diversity of Phyllospheric Bacterial Community in Tobacco Leaves Infected by Tobacco Weather Fleck

More Information
  • Received Date: 11/02/2024
  • MSC: S435.72

  • Climatic spot disease is an important non-invasive disease affecting tobacco, in order to analyze the structure and diversity of the interleaf bacterial communities of tobacco climatic spot disease, the composition of the interleaf microbial communities of infected and healthy tobacco leaves at different times was sequenced and analyzed by using Illumina high-throughput sequencing technology. The results showed that the dominant bacterial genera in diseased tobacco were Exiguobacterium, Pseudomonas, Pantoea, and Acinetobacter. The dominant bacterial genera in healthy tobacco were Pseudomonas, Exiguobacterium, Acinetobacter, Pantoea and Enterococcus. In the early stage of disease infection, the diversity and abundance of interleaf bacteria were higher than that of healthy tobacco, while in the middle and late stage of disease infection, the diversity and abundance of interleaf bacteria were lower than that of healthy tobacco. Among them, the relative abundance of interleaf bacterial genera unclassified__f__Enterobacteriaceae and Microbacterium in diseased tobacco was significantly higher than that of healthy tobacco. unclassified__f__Comamonadaceae, norank__f__norank__o___Chloroplast, unclassified_f__Asticcacaulis, Cupriavidus, norank__f__Microscillaceae, norank__f__Mitochondria, and Cloacibacterium of healthy tobacco were significantly higher than those of diseased tobacco leaves. This indicates that there are some differences in the structure, diversity, dominant genera and relative abundance of interleaf bacterial communities between tobacco climacteric mottle diseased leaves and healthy tobacco leaves.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 张淑婷, 董全雄, 吴先华, 等. 烟草气候斑点病防治技术[J]. 植物医生, 2015, 28(4):50-51.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 丁吉林. 不同药剂对烟草气候斑点病的控制效果及烟草的生理响应机制[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2009.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 侯冰清, 刘中威, 刘志广, 等. 硫酸铜复合剂防治烟草气候斑点病的研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017, 49(10):92-95.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 思永宪. 论混合药剂防治烟草气候斑点病的效果[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2018(2):120-121.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 张丽娟, 陈春旭, 王秋萍, 等. 移栽期对毕纳1号烟草气候斑病发生及生长的影响[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2019(2):21-24.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 蹇朝良, 任建华, 向先友, 等. 烤烟气候性斑点病发生与施肥量关系试验[J]. 农技服务, 2015, 32(8):107-108.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 潘金华, 黄化刚, 陈雪, 等. 深耕与施肥对毕节烤烟生长及产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2017, 38(3):14-19.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 魏宁生, 张满良. 三种烟草病害对烟叶产量和品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 1992, 20(3):33-36.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 同淑娥, 张金钰, 聂和平. 陕西烟草蚀纹病及气候斑点病对烤烟经济损失估计的研究[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2012, 58(2):41-44.

    Google Scholar

    [10] BERG G. Plant-Microbe Interactions Promoting Plant Growth and Health:Perspectives for Controlled Use of Microorganisms in Agriculture[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2009, 84(1):11-18.

    Google Scholar

    [11] LUGTENBERG B, KAMILOVA F. Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria[J]. Annual Review of Microbiology, 2009, 63:541-556.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 刘宇星, 董醇波, 邵秋雨, 等. 叶际微生物与植物健康研究进展[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2022, 42(2):88-98.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 高爽, 刘笑尘, 董铮, 等. 叶际微生物及其与外界互作的研究进展[J]. 植物科学学报, 2016, 34(4):654-661.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 吴小军, 汪汉成, 孙美丽, 等. 烟草角斑病叶际微生物群落结构与多样性分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2023, 56(10):1-10.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 刘畅, 汪汉成, 谢红炼, 等. 感染赤星病烟草叶际细菌的多样性分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2020, 53(2):8-14.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 徐慧, 杨根华, 张敏, 等. 云南烟草叶片内生及叶际细菌、真菌多样性研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2014, 29(2):149-154.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 刘亭亭, 汪汉成, 孙美丽, 等. 波尔多液对烟草叶际微生物群落结构与代谢功能的影响[J]. 农药学学报, 2022, 24(6):1446-1455.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 郭沫言, 熊晶, 汪汉成, 等. 菌核净对烟草靶斑病菌的抑制作用及对烟叶叶际微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 农药学学报, 2023, 25(4):858-869.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 彭军. 丰都县烟草气候性斑点病的发生规律及防治措施[J]. 现代农业科技, 2016(4):139, 141.

    Google Scholar

    [20] DEBRAY R, HERBERT R A, JAFFE A L, et al. Priority Effects in Microbiome Assembly[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2022, 20:109-121.

    Google Scholar

    [21] DEBRAY R, SOCOLAR Y, KAULBACH G, et al. Water Stress and Disruption of MycorrhizasInduce Parallel Shifts in Phyllosphere Microbiome Composition[J]. The New Phytologist, 2022, 234(6):2018-2031.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 孙美丽, 史彩华, 肖本青, 等. 烟草靶斑病叶际微生物群落结构与多样性分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2023, 56(4):1-9.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 刘亭亭, 曾陨涛, 汪汉成, 等. 赤星病发生期不同成熟度烟叶叶际微生物代谢与群落结构[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(6):22-29.

    Google Scholar

    [24] CHEN T, NOMURA K, WANG X L, et al. A Plant Genetic Network for Preventing Dysbiosis in the Phyllosphere[J]. Nature, 2020, 580:653-657.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(955) PDF downloads(312) Cited by(0)

Access History

Composition and Diversity of Phyllospheric Bacterial Community in Tobacco Leaves Infected by Tobacco Weather Fleck

Abstract: Climatic spot disease is an important non-invasive disease affecting tobacco, in order to analyze the structure and diversity of the interleaf bacterial communities of tobacco climatic spot disease, the composition of the interleaf microbial communities of infected and healthy tobacco leaves at different times was sequenced and analyzed by using Illumina high-throughput sequencing technology. The results showed that the dominant bacterial genera in diseased tobacco were Exiguobacterium, Pseudomonas, Pantoea, and Acinetobacter. The dominant bacterial genera in healthy tobacco were Pseudomonas, Exiguobacterium, Acinetobacter, Pantoea and Enterococcus. In the early stage of disease infection, the diversity and abundance of interleaf bacteria were higher than that of healthy tobacco, while in the middle and late stage of disease infection, the diversity and abundance of interleaf bacteria were lower than that of healthy tobacco. Among them, the relative abundance of interleaf bacterial genera unclassified__f__Enterobacteriaceae and Microbacterium in diseased tobacco was significantly higher than that of healthy tobacco. unclassified__f__Comamonadaceae, norank__f__norank__o___Chloroplast, unclassified_f__Asticcacaulis, Cupriavidus, norank__f__Microscillaceae, norank__f__Mitochondria, and Cloacibacterium of healthy tobacco were significantly higher than those of diseased tobacco leaves. This indicates that there are some differences in the structure, diversity, dominant genera and relative abundance of interleaf bacterial communities between tobacco climacteric mottle diseased leaves and healthy tobacco leaves.

Reference (24)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return