The Essential Interpretation and Orientation of Education Evaluation Reform in the New Era:What kind of educational evaluation do we need in the new era

Zhu Dequan; Cao Dufan

Article Contents

Previous Article Next Article

Zhu Dequan, Cao Dufan. The Essential Interpretation and Orientation of Education Evaluation Reform in the New Era:What kind of educational evaluation do we need in the new era[J]. Journal of Teacher Education.

Citation:

The Essential Interpretation and Orientation of Education Evaluation Reform in the New Era:What kind of educational evaluation do we need in the new era

Zhu Dequan^1,2,
Cao Dufan¹

1. Center for Studies of Education and Psychology of Minorities in Southwest China， Southwest University， Chongqing 400715;
2. Faculty of Education， Southwest University， Chongqing 400715

More Information

MSC: G521

Abstract

The reform of educational evaluation in the new era means that educational evaluation has entered a new stage of development, which will demonstrate extraordinary value and strategic significance in politics, history, and reality. Understanding what kind of educational evaluation we need in the new era is the foundation for the reform of educational evaluation in the new era. As an activity of value judgment, educational evaluation plays an important role in improving educational activities, enhancing educational quality, and promoting educational reform. The essence of educational evaluation reform in the new era lies in achieving iterative upgrading of traditional educational evaluation, constructing an educational evaluation system rich in the characteristics of the times, meeting practical needs, and showcasing Chinese characteristics. In different stages of historical development, China's education evaluation reform has gone through an era of paradigm based on management, pragmatism, humanism, and scientism. In the new era, China's education industry is facing new opportunities and challenges, so the paradigm of scientific humanism has become the goal pursuit of China's education evaluation reform in the new era. But in practice, the general public is full of confusion about "what kind of educational evaluation do we need?" This is manifested in: whether educational evaluation with advanced theories is what we need; Is education evaluation with high-end technology what we need; Is it necessary for us to consider educational evaluation that maximizes benefits. In fact, the education evaluation we need in the new era cannot be measured solely by "first-class" standards, but should have the characteristics of people-oriented, effective, and comprehensive consideration. Therefore, in the direction and positioning of education evaluation reform in the new era, we must adhere to the correct value orientation; Secondly, it is necessary to have a good element structure; We need to face future development needs.
- educational evaluation,
- education evaluation reform in the new era,
- paradigm of education evaluation,
- Scientific Humanism

References

[1]	弗朗西斯· C.福勒.教育政策学导论[M].许庆豫,译.南京:江苏教育出版社. 2007:278. Google Scholar
[2]	格特·比斯塔.测量时代的好教育:伦理、政治和民主的维度[M].张立平,韩亚菲,译.北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2019:11-12.. Google Scholar
[3]	中共中央国务院深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案[EB/OL].(2020-10-13)[2021-05-24]. http//www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm. Google Scholar
[4]	刘云生.论新时代系统推进教育评价改革[J].国家教育行政学院学报, 2022(2):13-24. Google Scholar
[5]	杨聚鹏.新时代教育评价改革政策的实践困境与推进策略研究[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(6):181-190. Google Scholar
[6]	辛涛,李雪燕.教育评价理论与实践的新进展[J].清华大学教育研究, 2005(6):38-43. Google Scholar
[7]	TYLER R W. Changing concepts of educational evaluation[J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 1986, 10(1):1-113. Google Scholar
[8]	CRONBACH L J. Course Improvement through Evaluation[M].Boston:Kluwer-Nijhoff. 1983:101-115. Google Scholar
[9]	STUFFLEBEAM D L. A depth study of the evaluation requirement[J].Theory Into Practice, 1966, 5(3):121-133. Google Scholar
[10]	陈玉琨.教育评价学[M].北京:人民教育出版社, 1999:7. Google Scholar
[11]	黄光扬.教育测量与评价[M].2版.上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2012:2. Google Scholar
[12]	约翰·杜威.评价理论[M].冯平,余泽娜,等译.上海:上海译文出版社, 2007:19. Google Scholar
[13]	格朗兰德.教学测量与评价[M].郑军,等编译,石家庄:河北教育出版社, 1991:4. Google Scholar
[14]	张曙光.过程性评价的哲学诠释[J].齐鲁学刊, 2012(4):69-73. Google Scholar
[15]	靳玉乐.教育评价改革的"去三化"与"兴三化"[J].大学教育科学, 2021(1):13-15. Google Scholar
[16]	张善超,仇国伟.新时代教育评价改革的困境与化解之道[J].大学教育科学, 2022(1):89-96. Google Scholar
[17]	新华社.习近平看望参加政协会议的医药卫生界教育界委员[EB/OL].(2021-03-06)[2021-09-24].https://www.gov.cn/govweb/xinwen/2021-03/06/content_5591047.htm?eqid=ee17888500022c13000 000036474bed1 Google Scholar
[18]	JACKSON M R.Unified clinical science, or paradigm diversity?Comment on Melchert (2016)[J].The American Psychologist, 2017, 72(4):395-396. Google Scholar
[19]	福勒.教育政策学导论[M].许庆豫,译.南京:江苏教育出版社, 2007:50. Google Scholar
[20]	司林波,裴索亚.中国共产党百年教育评价制度发展的历程、特征与展望[J].现代教育管理, 2021 (10):1-11. Google Scholar
[21]	中共中央、国务院关于教育工作的指示[EB/OL].(1958-09-19)[2021-05-09]. http//www.china.com.cn/guoqing/2012-09/10/content_26746856.htm. Google Scholar
[22]	冯丹,朱德全.中国教育评价改革的制度变迁:脉络、逻辑与路向[J].国家教育行政学院学报, 2023 (10):69-77, 86. Google Scholar
[23]	古贝,林肯.第四代评估[M].秦霖,蒋燕玲,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2008:1. Google Scholar
[24]	曹渡帆,朱德全.新时代教育评价改革的数字正义何以可能[J].电化教育研究, 2023(12):21-27, 34. Google Scholar
[25]	王哲.解决问题——劳丹科学进步模式述评[J].内蒙古社会科学(汉文版), 2003(S1):85-87. Google Scholar
[26]	秦建平,陈晓松,周亚,等.科学进步视野下教育评价理论的代际发展审思[J].教育导刊, 2022(12):5-12. Google Scholar
[27]	王道俊,扈中平.教育学原理[M].福州:福建教育出版社, 1998:64-76. Google Scholar
[28]	卢岚.社会转型与研究范式:思想政治教育范式转换及其运作逻辑[J].学校党建与思想教育, 2021 (7):14-20. Google Scholar
[29]	刘云生.抢占教育智能化评估的制高点[J].教育发展研究, 2019(3):3. Google Scholar
[30]	尤瓦尔·赫拉利.未来简史:从智人到智神[M].林俊宏,译.北京:中信出版集团, 2017:340-341. Google Scholar
[31]	罗生全,陈卓.大数据时代教育评价的价值重构与逻辑理路[J].贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(4):116-128. Google Scholar
[32]	刘云生.运用现代信息技术开展学生立体评价的时代意蕴与探索思路[J].国家教育行政学院学报, 2020(10):3-10, 23. Google Scholar
[33]	马丁·海德格尔.演讲与论文集[M].孙周兴,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2005:37. Google Scholar
[34]	吴龙凯,程浩,张珊,等.智能技术赋能教育评价的时代内涵、伦理困境及对策研究[J].电化教育研究, 2023(9):19-25. Google Scholar
[35]	曾水兵.什么是好的教育[J].人民教育, 2007(17):60. Google Scholar
[36]	尼采.论道德的谱系[M].周红,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店, 1992:39. Google Scholar
[37]	朱德全,许丽丽.技术与生命之维的耦合:未来教育旨归[J].中国电化教育, 2019(9):1-6. Google Scholar
[38]	周作宇.论教育评价的治理功能及其自反性立场[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021(8):1-19. Google Scholar
[39]	蔡心心,秦一鸣,李军.教育改进学的创建与中国探索:知识基础与学科框架[J].清华大学教育研究, 2020(3):25-33. Google Scholar
[40]	吉永桃,冯建军.加速社会教育中的时间困境及其超越[J].基础教育, 2022(5):5-16. Google Scholar
[41]	祁占勇,杜越.什么是好的教育政策执行效果的评估[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022 (2):29-42. Google Scholar
[42]	菲利普•W.杰克逊.课堂生活[M].丁道勇,译.北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2021:204-205. Google Scholar
[43]	刘志军,徐彬.教育评价:应然性与实然性的博弈及超越[J].教育研究, 2019(5):10-17. Google Scholar
[44]	逯行.智能技术引发的教育主体行为失范如何判定:方法、类型与表现[J].现代远程教育研究, 2022 (2):37-46. Google Scholar
[45]	万永奇.好的教育评价及其实现[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 2021(6):109-115. Google Scholar
[46]	谢小蓉,张辉蓉.五育并举视域下学生增值评价的发展困境与破解策略[J].中国电化教育, 2021(11):32-38. Google Scholar
[47]	谢小蓉,张辉蓉.新时代基础教育学生评价的价值取向与发展路径[J].中国教育科学(中英文), 2022(5):27-35. Google Scholar
[48]	范涌峰,宋乃庆.大数据时代的教育测评模型及其范式构建[J].中国社会科学, 2019(12):139-155, 202-203. Google Scholar
[49]	凯文·凯利.失控——全人类的最终命运和结局[M].北京:新星出版社, 2012:3. Google Scholar
[50]	杜明峰.教育质量评价的科学取向及其伦理反思[J].教育发展研究, 2022(6):65-70, 77. Google Scholar
[51]	张进良,杨苗,谈桂芬.智能技术赋能基础教育评价改革的实然困境与路径选择[J].中国远程教育, 2023(2):18-27. Google Scholar
[52]	宋乃庆,郑智勇,周圆林翰.新时代基础教育评价改革的大数据赋能与路向[J].中国电化教育, 2021 (2):1-7. Google Scholar
[53]	胡伶.教育政策评估标准体系的架构研究[J].教育理论与实践, 2008(34):20-24. Google Scholar
[54]	吴康宁.教育改革成功的基础[J].教育研究, 2012(1):24-31. Google Scholar
[55]	刘云生.论新时代系统推进教育评价改革[J].国家教育行政学院学报, 2022(2):13-24. 刘志军,徐彬.教育评价的实践定位及其实现——基于实践哲学的视角[J].中国电化教育, 2022(4):64-70. Google Scholar
[56]	刘云生.新时代教育评价体系构建的中国路向[J].教育与经济, 2023(4):3-12. Google Scholar
[57]	司林波.新时代教育评价改革的现实背景、内在逻辑与实践路向[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(1):96-110. Google Scholar

Access History

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Export Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views(1245) PDF downloads(574) Cited by(0)

Name
	Name cannot be empty!
E-mail
	Mailbox cannot be empty! Mailbox cannot be empty!
Telephone
	Mobile number cannot be empty! Please enter a valid mobile number!
Title

Content
Verification Code

Message Board

The Essential Interpretation and Orientation of Education Evaluation Reform in the New Era:What kind of educational evaluation do we need in the new era

Abstract

References

Access History

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

The Essential Interpretation and Orientation of Education Evaluation Reform in the New Era:What kind of educational evaluation do we need in the new era

HTML

Catalog

Message Board

The Essential Interpretation and Orientation of Education Evaluation Reform in the New Era:What kind of educational evaluation do we need in the new era

Abstract

References

Access History

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

The Essential Interpretation and Orientation of Education Evaluation Reform in the New Era:What kind of educational evaluation do we need in the new era

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content