ZHOU Xian, ZHANG Tian-xiao, JIA Qie, et al. Effects of Soil Fumigants on the Soil-Borne Disease Control and Yield of Ginger[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2021, (3): 40-44. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwys.2021.03.008
Citation: |
ZHOU Xian, ZHANG Tian-xiao, JIA Qie, et al. Effects of Soil Fumigants on the Soil-Borne Disease Control and Yield of Ginger[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2021, (3): 40-44. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwys.2021.03.008
|
Effects of Soil Fumigants on the Soil-Borne Disease Control and Yield of Ginger
-
1. College of Horticulture and Gardening/Institute of Spice Crops, Yangtze University, Jingzhou Hubei 434025, China;
-
2. Jingzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jingzhou Hubei 434026, China;
-
3. Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Yongchuan Chongqing 402168, China;
-
4. Chongqing Fuyuan Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute Co., Ltd, Yongchuan Chongqing 402160, China
More Information
-
Corresponding author:
LIU Ran, 主要从事蔬菜植物保护推广应用.email:260872933@qq.com
-
Received Date:
30/04/2021
-
MSC:
S472
-
Abstract
The damage of soil-borne bacterial wilt and stem base rot on ginger seriously restricts the sustainable development of the ginger industry,and application of soil fumigants shows good effectiveness for disease control. In this paper,two soil fumigants,chloropicrin and dazomet,were used as research objects to explore their control effects on ginger bacterial wilt and stem base rot,as well as their effects on ginger yield. The results showed that both fumigants had no phytotoxicity to ginger and after the mulch was removed the ginger buds grew normally. Compared with the control,both fumigants reduced the incidence of ginger bacterial wilt and stem base rot,and the control effect against bacterial wilt in the late stage reached 83.0% and 78.9%,respectively,while that against stem base rot in the late stage reached 83.6% and 78.4%,respectively.Additionally,these two treatments significantly increased the yield of ginger,the proportion of premium ginger and the value of ginger products.
-
-
References
[1]
|
杨晓楠, 高德良, 韩君, 等. 棉隆及氯化苦对几种生姜土传病原物的毒力[J]. 农药学学报, 2011, 13(3):331-334.
Google Scholar
|
[2]
|
MAO L G, JIANG H Y, WANG Q X, et al. Efficacy of Soil Fumigation with Dazomet for Controlling Ginger Bacterial Wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) in China[J]. Crop Protection, 2017, 100:111-116.
Google Scholar
|
[3]
|
付丽军, 王永存, 王向东, 等. 6种杀菌剂对姜青枯病的防治效果[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(1):216-220.
Google Scholar
|
[4]
|
曹坳程, 刘晓漫, 郭美霞, 等. 作物土传病害的危害及防治技术[J]. 植物保护, 2017, 43(2):6-16.
Google Scholar
|
[5]
|
方文生, 曹坳程, 韩大伟, 等. 两种熏蒸剂对土传病害的防控效果及黄瓜产量的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2016(7):44-48.
Google Scholar
|
[6]
|
向礼波, 汪华, 严顺, 等. 98%棉隆微粒剂对生姜根结线虫和茎腐病防治效果评价[J]. 湖北植保, 2016(6):38-39, 29.
Google Scholar
|
[7]
|
王玉涛, 王文博, 郭栋梁, 等. 氯化苦在土壤中的消解动态和残留量检测研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(18):8651-8652, 8655.
Google Scholar
|
[8]
|
冯义志, 潘金菊, 刘伟. 棉隆在番茄和土壤中的残留消解动态及残留量[J]. 农药, 2015, 54(8):588-590.
Google Scholar
|
[9]
|
LIU Y Q, WU L, WU X W, et al. Analysis of Microbial Diversity in Soil under Ginger Cultivation[J]. Scientifica, 2017, 2017:1-4.
Google Scholar
|
[10]
|
王前, 黄斌, 颜冬冬, 等. 氯化苦熏蒸处理对土壤氮素和微量元素转化的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(6):73-77, 98.
Google Scholar
|
[11]
|
燕平梅, 魏爱丽, 乔宏萍, 等. 威百亩熏蒸对土壤反硝化作用及nirS型反硝化细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2019, 46(2):393-400.
Google Scholar
|
-
-
Access History