引用本文:李毅[1] 、沈建国[2].三种综合评价(评分)方法在体育评价中的比较研究[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,42(8):
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 45次   下载   
分享到: 微信 更多
三种综合评价(评分)方法在体育评价中的比较研究
李毅[1] 、沈建国[2]
作者单位
李毅[1] 、沈建国[2] 中山大学 体育部,广州,510275 浙江工商大学 体育部,杭州,310118 
摘要:
为将科学合理、简便易行的先进评价方法引入体育评价,对3种体育综合评价方法进行了比较研究.研究显示:3种综合评分方法均科学合理(信度高)、简便易行(效度好),且对研究样本的计算结果基本趋向一致,可以为体育实践中的教学、训练、竞赛、管理、健身、科研评价、对比、衡量、判断、分类、预测和决策的量化工作提供标准和调控依据.
关键词:  经验定性  科学定量  综合评价  比较研究
DOI:10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2017.08.021
分类号:G807
基金项目:
Comparative Research on Three Comprehensive Evaluation (Grading) Methods in Evaluation of Physical Education
LI Yi[1],SHEN Jian-guo[2]
Abstract:
Various methods, scientific and reasonable, simple and feasible, have been introduced into the evaluation of sports, with three sports comprehensive evaluation method for physical education stated in this article to lead to the discard of the disadvantage of assessments that rely on the daily experience, and thus rise to the height of scientific quantitative evaluation, moreover, accomplishing the purpose of macro-control and micro-analysis.They also have great profound strategic significance for better guiding the evaluation of physical education practice, deepening the education reform, and cultivating KAQ (knowledge, ability, quality) talents who can participate in the international competition.The results show that three comprehensive evaluation methods are scientific and reasonable, high reliability, easy (validity), and the basic trend is consistent, the calculation results of the sample provides the basis of the standard and regulation for quantitative work in physical education, mass sports, training, competition, management, health, scientific research evaluation, contrast, measure, judgment, classification, prediction and decision.
Key words:  experience factors in qualitative assessment  scientific quantitative analysis  comprehensive evaluation  comparative research
手机扫一扫看