矿产资源型企业社会责任评价研究——以兖州煤业为例

陶宇,冷婉薇

doi:10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.12.018

西南师范大学学报(自然科学版)

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
	姓名不能为空！
邮箱
	邮箱不能为空！非法的邮箱地址。
手机号码
	电话不能为空！请输入有效手机号!
标题
	标题不能为空！
留言内容
	内容不能为空！
验证码
	验证码不能为空！验证码错误！

矿产资源型企业社会责任评价研究——以兖州煤业为例

陶宇,冷婉薇. 矿产资源型企业社会责任评价研究——以兖州煤业为例[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 43(12): 108-114. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.12.018

引用本文:

陶宇,冷婉薇. 矿产资源型企业社会责任评价研究——以兖州煤业为例[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 43(12): 108-114. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.12.018

TAO Yu, LENG Wan-wei. Evaluation on Mineral Resources-Oriented Enterprises' Corporate Social Responsibility——A Case Study of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 43(12): 108-114. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.12.018

Citation:

TAO Yu, LENG Wan-wei. Evaluation on Mineral Resources-Oriented Enterprises' Corporate Social Responsibility——A Case Study of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 43(12): 108-114. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.12.018

矿产资源型企业社会责任评价研究——以兖州煤业为例

陶宇,冷婉薇

重庆科技学院法政与经贸学院, 重庆 401331

Evaluation on Mineral Resources-Oriented Enterprises' Corporate Social Responsibility——A Case Study of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited

TAO Yu, LENG Wan-wei

School of Economics and Social Studies, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China

摘要: 近年来企业社会责任成为了全球热议的话题，学术界对于企业是否应当履行社会责任已经基本达成共识.矿产资源型企业不仅在经济发展中占据非常重要的地位，且易对资源环境协调发展产生牵制作用.我国矿产资源型企业社会责任评价研究起步较晚，还未形成具有普适性的评价指标体系.研究从契约型利益相关者和公众型利益相关者两个视角出发，运用SMART原则筛选出22项指标，结合层次分析法构建了矿产资源型企业社会责任评价体系，以兖州煤业年报数据作为样本进行实证分析，发现其企业社会责任履行情况呈W型变化.并进一步提出政府作为利益相关者、政策制定者和监管者，对于企业履行社会责任具有主推作用，且其他利益相关者在矿产资源开发利用中较易受到侵害，对他们的充分调动有助于形成合力，促进矿产资源型企业履行社会责任.
- 资源型企业 /
- 企业社会责任 /
- 评价指标体系 /
- 兖州煤业
Abstract: In the recent years, CSR behavior has become a hot topic in the world. The academic circles have basically reached a consensus on whether the enterprises should fulfill their social responsibilities. Mineral Resources-Oriented Enterprises not only own important position in economic development, but also affect the coordinated development of resources and environment. Researches on the evaluation of mineral resources-oriented enterprises' corporate social responsibility performance are still in the initial stage, without commonly used evaluation system. This paper employs contract stakeholder and public stakeholder, together with SMART principle, to select 22 indicators, while Analytic Hierarchy Process method is chosen to construct the final evaluation system. Based on the data of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, it is found that this firm's corporate social responsibility performance show a W-shaped change. Against the backdrop, we believe government, as the main stakeholder, rule maker and regulator, should play a main role, while other stakeholders should also be encouraged to take part in the fulfillment of corporate social responsibility.
- Mineral Resources-Oriented Enterprises /
- Corporate Social Responsibility /
- Evaluation System /
- Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited .

[1]	PREUSS L, BARKEMEYER R, GLAVAS A. Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Country Multinationals:Identifying Company and Country-Level Infl Uences[J]. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2016, 26(3):347-378.
[2]	SCHREMPF-STIRLING J, PALAZZO G, ROBERT A, et al. Historic Corporate Social Responsibility[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2016, 41(4):700-719.
[3]	吉海涛. 资源型企业生态责任的利益相关者协同作用分析[J]. 南京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 22(1):97-100,124.
[4]	邹武平. 资源型企业生态责任培育研究——基于财务的视角[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2009, 25(11):997-999.
[5]	郝祖涛, 严良, 谢雄标, 等. 集群内资源型企业绿色行为决策关键影响因素的识别研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(10):170-176.
[6]	王丹, 朱波强. 基于熵值法的我国企业社会责任评价研究——以矿产资源型企业为例[J]. 会计之友, 2014(30):8-12.
[7]	齐乐. 资源型企业社会责任履行状况分析——基于河南省数据的定量分析[J]. 商业会计, 2016, 3(5):63-65.
[8]	许树柏. 实用决策方法:层次分析法原理[M]. 天津:天津大学出版社, 1988.
[9]	李晓军, 白思俊. 中国资源型企业研究综述[J]. 青海社会科学, 2012(1):52-56.
[10]	唐鹏程, 杨树旺. 企业社会责任投资模式研究:基于价值的判断标准[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016(7):109-126.
[11]	陶宇. 生态文明视角下矿业企业资源开发利用绩效评价研究[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学, 2015.
[12]	李明, 包莉丽. 企业社会责任风险评价体系的构建与运用[J]. 财会月刊, 2017(3):61-66.
[13]	苗泽华, 彭靖. 资源型企业生态工程评价指标体系的构建——基于利益相关者视角[J]. 科技管理研究, 2014, 34(23):91-94,109.
[14]	叶恒, 疏畅, 何飞颖. 社会责任与市场竞争对盈余管理影响的实证研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(12):98-104.
[15]	余玮, 郑颖, 辛琳. 企业社会责任报告披露的影响因素研究——基于控股股东和外资股东视角[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2017(2):78-87.
[16]	谢雄标, 吴越, 冯忠垒, 等. 中国资源型企业绿色行为调查研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(6):5-11.
[17]	杨丹, 郑立群. 化工企业社会责任与企业价值相关性研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2017, 31(8):204-212.

计量

文章访问数: 743
HTML全文浏览数: 564
PDF下载数: 106
施引文献: 0

矿产资源型企业社会责任评价研究——以兖州煤业为例

陶宇,冷婉薇

重庆科技学院法政与经贸学院, 重庆 401331

收稿日期: 2018-07-25

关键词:

摘要: 近年来企业社会责任成为了全球热议的话题，学术界对于企业是否应当履行社会责任已经基本达成共识.矿产资源型企业不仅在经济发展中占据非常重要的地位，且易对资源环境协调发展产生牵制作用.我国矿产资源型企业社会责任评价研究起步较晚，还未形成具有普适性的评价指标体系.研究从契约型利益相关者和公众型利益相关者两个视角出发，运用SMART原则筛选出22项指标，结合层次分析法构建了矿产资源型企业社会责任评价体系，以兖州煤业年报数据作为样本进行实证分析，发现其企业社会责任履行情况呈W型变化.并进一步提出政府作为利益相关者、政策制定者和监管者，对于企业履行社会责任具有主推作用，且其他利益相关者在矿产资源开发利用中较易受到侵害，对他们的充分调动有助于形成合力，促进矿产资源型企业履行社会责任.

English Abstract

Evaluation on Mineral Resources-Oriented Enterprises' Corporate Social Responsibility——A Case Study of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited

重庆科技学院法政与经贸学院, 重庆 401331

Received Date: 2018-07-25

Keywords:

Abstract: In the recent years, CSR behavior has become a hot topic in the world. The academic circles have basically reached a consensus on whether the enterprises should fulfill their social responsibilities. Mineral Resources-Oriented Enterprises not only own important position in economic development, but also affect the coordinated development of resources and environment. Researches on the evaluation of mineral resources-oriented enterprises' corporate social responsibility performance are still in the initial stage, without commonly used evaluation system. This paper employs contract stakeholder and public stakeholder, together with SMART principle, to select 22 indicators, while Analytic Hierarchy Process method is chosen to construct the final evaluation system. Based on the data of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, it is found that this firm's corporate social responsibility performance show a W-shaped change. Against the backdrop, we believe government, as the main stakeholder, rule maker and regulator, should play a main role, while other stakeholders should also be encouraged to take part in the fulfillment of corporate social responsibility.