高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

“湘烟7号”对青枯病的抗性鉴定与品质分析

,  ,  ,  , 

上一篇

下一篇

成志军, 黄继宁, 苏祥云, 等. “湘烟7号”对青枯病的抗性鉴定与品质分析[J]. 植物医学, 2023, (1): 50-56. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2023.01.007
引用本文: 成志军, 黄继宁, 苏祥云, 等. “湘烟7号”对青枯病的抗性鉴定与品质分析[J]. 植物医学, 2023, (1): 50-56. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2023.01.007
shu
CHENG Zhi-jun, HUANG Ji-ning, SU Xiang-yun, et al. Identification Bacterial Wilt Resistance of ‘Xiangyan No.7’ Tobacco and Its Quality Analysis[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, (1): 50-56. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2023.01.007
Citation: CHENG Zhi-jun, HUANG Ji-ning, SU Xiang-yun, et al. Identification Bacterial Wilt Resistance of ‘Xiangyan No.7’ Tobacco and Its Quality Analysis[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, (1): 50-56. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2023.01.007
shu

“湘烟7号”对青枯病的抗性鉴定与品质分析

  • 1. 湖南中烟工业有限责任公司, 长沙 410007;

  • 2. 西南大学 植物保护学院, 重庆 400715;

  • 3. 西南大学 农学与生物科技学院, 重庆 400715

详细信息
    作者简介:

    成志军,高级农艺师,主要从事烟叶生产研究. .

  • 中图分类号: S432

Identification Bacterial Wilt Resistance of ‘Xiangyan No.7’ Tobacco and Its Quality Analysis

  • 1. China Tobacco Hunan Industrial Co. Ltd, Changsha 410007, China;

  • 2. College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China;

  • 3. College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

  • 摘要: 选育优良抗病品种是防治烟草土传病害的有效手段之一.本研究选择“湘烟7号”和“云烟87”两种不同的烟草品种,通过室内和田间抗病效果评价,以及测定烟叶常规化学成分含量,鉴定不同烟草品种对青枯病的抗性效果,并分析烟叶品质差异.结果表明,室内盆栽和田间试验均显示,相较于“云烟87”,“湘烟7号”发病率更低,抗病性更强;2种烟草移栽后30 d,调查农艺性状发现“湘烟7号”叶面积显著高于“云烟87”,其余指标无明显差异;在移栽后60 d,“云烟87”株高显著高于“湘烟7号”,其余指标无明显差异;测定烟碱、总氮等化学成分发现,“云烟87”在化学成分含量以及协调性方面优于“湘烟7号”;可以看出“湘烟7号”对青枯病抗病性更强,而“云烟87”则化学成分及协调性较好.本研究明确了2种不同烟草品种在抗病性、农艺性状以及品质的不同表现,旨在选育优良的抗性品种,提高烟叶产量,可为后续烟株种植提供理论依据.
    Abstract: Breeding good disease-resistant varieties is one of the effective methods to control soil-borne tobacco diseases. In this study, two different tobacco varieties, ‘Xiangyan No. 7' and ‘Yunyan 87', were used. The resistance of different tobacco varieties to bacterial wilt disease was identified by indoor and field evaluation of resistance, and the difference of tobacco leaf quality was analyzed by determination of conventional chemical components of tobacco leaves. The results showed that compared with ‘Yunyan 87', ‘Xiangyan 7' had lower morbidity and stronger disease resistance. The leaf area of ‘Xiangyan No.7' was significantly larger than that of ‘Yunyan 87' after 30 days of transplanting, and had no significant difference on other indexes. At 60 days after transplanting, the height of ‘Yunyan 87' was significantly higher than that of ‘Xiangyan No.7', but the other indexes had no significant difference. It was found that ‘Yunyan 87' was better than ‘Xiangyan No.7' in chemical composition and coordination. To sum up, ‘Xiangyan No.7' had stronger resistance to bacterial wilt, while ‘Yunyan 87' had better chemical composition and coordination. This study clarified the different performance of two different tobacco varieties in disease resistance, agronomic traits and tobacco quality, aiming at breeding excellent resistant varieties and improving tobacco yield, and provide theoretical basis for subsequent tobacco plant planting.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 陈勇,金晨钟.烟草青枯病的发生与防治 [J].现代农业科技,2009(10):92-93.
    [2] WICKER E,GRASSART L,CORANSON-BEAUDU R,et al.Ralstonia solanacearum Strains from Martinique (French West Indies) Exhibiting a New Pathogenic Potential [J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2007,73(21):6790-6801.
    [3] 耿锐梅,程立锐,刘旦,等.烟草青枯病抗性遗传效应分析 [J].中国烟草科学,2019,40(4):7-13.
    [4] 韩松庭,丁伟.烟草青枯病的化学防治研究进展 [J].植物医生,2019,32(5):20-25.
    [5] 杨友才,周清明,朱列书.烟草品种青枯病抗病性及抗性遗传研究 [J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,31(4):381-383.
    [6] 何永宏,曾乙心,刘林,等.温度和品种抗性对烟草青枯病潜育期的影响 [J].烟草科技,2017,50(6):16-20,32.
    [7] 龚杰,刘慧迪,刘颖,等.不同烟草品种在重庆市彭水地区的青枯病抗性比较 [J].植物医学,2022,1(1):61-67.
    [8] 汪炳华.云南烟草主栽品种抗青枯病田间抗性测定及评价 [D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2008.
    [9] 陈泽鹏,陈元生,罗战勇,等.烟草品种对青枯病的抗性鉴定初报 [J].广东农业科学,2000,27(2):34-35.
    [10] 匡传富,罗宽.烟草品种对青枯病抗病性及抗性机制的研究 [J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,28(5):395-398.
    [11] 颜成生,黄景崇,彭金良,等.4个烤烟品种农艺性状与经济特性研究 [J].湖南农业科学,2012(11):11-13,25.
    [12] 苏德成.中国烟草栽培学 [M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2005.
    [13] HUSSAIN T.Bacillus Subtilis HussainT-AMU and Its Antifungal Activity Against Potato Black Scurf Caused by Rhizoctonia Solani on Seed Tubers [J].Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology,2020,23:101443.
    [14] 董夏伟,缪莉,靳翠丽,等.一株高效抑制烟草青枯病菌的烟田土壤细菌的分离与鉴定 [J].江西农业学报,2011,23(6):30-33.
    [15] 尹华群,易有金,罗宽,等.烟草青枯病内生拮抗细菌的鉴定及小区防效的初步测定 [J].中国生物防治,2004,20(3):219-220.
    [16] 刘云鹏.根际促生解淀粉芽孢杆菌根际定殖和诱导植物系统抗性的机理研究 [D].北京:中国农业科学院,2019.
    [17] QIU M H,ZHANG R F,XUE C,et al.Application of Bio-Organic Fertilizer can Control Fusarium Wilt of Cucumber Plants by Regulating Microbial Community of Rhizosphere Soil [J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2012,48(7):807-816.
    [18] 侯乐梅,孟瑞青,乜兰春,等.不同微生物菌剂对基质酶活性和番茄产量及品质的影响 [J].应用生态学报,2016,27(8):2520-2526.
    [19] 吕伟生,黄国强,邵正英,等.接种菌剂腐熟稻草育秧基质提高机插稻秧苗素质及产量 [J].农业工程学报,2017,33(11):195-202.
    [20] WAGI S,AHMED A.Bacillus SPP.:Potent Microfactories of Bacterial IAA [J].PeerJ,2019,7:e7258.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  313
  • HTML全文浏览数:  283
  • PDF下载数:  103
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-11-07

“湘烟7号”对青枯病的抗性鉴定与品质分析

    作者简介: 成志军,高级农艺师,主要从事烟叶生产研究.
  • 1. 湖南中烟工业有限责任公司, 长沙 410007;
  • 2. 西南大学 植物保护学院, 重庆 400715;
  • 3. 西南大学 农学与生物科技学院, 重庆 400715
  • 收稿日期:  2022-11-07
基金项目: 

摘要: 选育优良抗病品种是防治烟草土传病害的有效手段之一.本研究选择“湘烟7号”和“云烟87”两种不同的烟草品种,通过室内和田间抗病效果评价,以及测定烟叶常规化学成分含量,鉴定不同烟草品种对青枯病的抗性效果,并分析烟叶品质差异.结果表明,室内盆栽和田间试验均显示,相较于“云烟87”,“湘烟7号”发病率更低,抗病性更强;2种烟草移栽后30 d,调查农艺性状发现“湘烟7号”叶面积显著高于“云烟87”,其余指标无明显差异;在移栽后60 d,“云烟87”株高显著高于“湘烟7号”,其余指标无明显差异;测定烟碱、总氮等化学成分发现,“云烟87”在化学成分含量以及协调性方面优于“湘烟7号”;可以看出“湘烟7号”对青枯病抗病性更强,而“云烟87”则化学成分及协调性较好.本研究明确了2种不同烟草品种在抗病性、农艺性状以及品质的不同表现,旨在选育优良的抗性品种,提高烟叶产量,可为后续烟株种植提供理论依据.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (20)

目录

版权所有：植物医学

地址：重庆市北碚区西南大学 电话：023-68250657 电子邮箱：zhiwuyixue@sina.com

本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司开发

/

返回文章
返回