Analysis of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Tobacco Bacterial Wilt Diseased Fields and Healthy Fields in Tobacco Area of Guizhou
-
摘要: 为明确贵州蜜甜香型烟区烟草青枯病发病土壤与健康土壤理化性质的差异,本研究对贵州烟区土壤样本进行采集和室内理化性质检测.结果表明,贵州烟区健康土壤的pH值、有机质(SOM)、速效钾(AK)、交换性钙和交换性镁质量分数均高于发病土壤,碱解氮(SAN)(除思南外)质量分数低于发病土壤,其中,瓮安、紫云健康土壤的pH值显著高于发病土壤,天柱、桐梓、瓮安发病SAN高于健康土壤,而健康土壤的SOM(桐梓除外)、 AK、交换性钙质量分数均高于发病土壤且差异有统计学意义,有效磷(AP)、交换性镁(天柱除外)差异无统计学意义.总体而言,土壤pH值、交换性钙、 AK和SOM与烟草青枯病发生有关,其中SAN偏高、土壤偏酸、 AK、 SOM和交换性钙偏低时有利于烟草青枯病发生.Abstract: To clarify the physical and chemical properties of soils of tobacco bacterial wilt diseased fields and healthy fields in the honey-sweet aroma tobacco production region of Guizhou, the study was conducted to collect soil samples from tobacco region of Guizhou and test the physical and chemical properties in laboratory. The results showed that the pH, soil organic matter(SOM), available kalium(AK), exchangeable calcium and magnesium contents of healthy soils in the tobacco area of Guizhou were higher than those of diseased soils, and the contents of soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen(SAN)(except Sinan) were lower than those of diseased soils. Among them, the pH of healthy soils from Wengan and Ziyun was significantly higher than that of diseased soils, and the SAN of diseased soils from Tianzhu, Tongzi, and Wengan were higher than that of healthy soils, while the SOM(except Tongzi), AP, and exchangeable calcium contents of healthy soils were significantly higher than those of diseased soils. There were no significant differences in effective phosphorus(AP) and exchangeable magnesium(except Tianzhu) between two soils. Overall, soil pH, exchange calcium, AK and SOM were associated with the occurrence of tobacco bacterial wilt, among which high SAN, soil acidity, AK, SOM and low exchange calcium were conducive to the occurrence of tobacco bacterial wilt.
-
Key words:
- tobacco bacterial wilt /
- healthy soil /
- pathogenic soil /
- soil physicochemical property .
-
-
[1] 丁伟.烟草青枯病与黑胫病绿色防控关键技术 [J].植物医生,2020,33(1):21-26. [2] 祖庆学,聂忠扬,林松,等.新形势下烟草青枯病发生特点与防治技术措施 [J].植物医学,2022,1(1):90-96. [3] 王垚,黄纯杨,杨亮,等.烟草青枯病复配增效药剂筛选及田间防效[J].农药,2022,61(10):776-780. [4] 丁伟,李石力.植物医学的新概念:土壤免疫 [J].植物医生,2019,32(2):1-7. [5] 李石力.有机酸类根系分泌物影响烟草青枯病发生的机制研究 [D].重庆:西南大学,2017. [6] 于威,依艳丽,杨蕾.土壤中钙、 氮含量对番茄枯萎病抗性的影响 [J].中国土壤与肥料,2016(1):134-140. [7] 薛欣欣,吴小平,王文斌,等.植物-土壤系统中钾镁营养及其交互作用研究进展 [J].土壤,2019,51(1):1-10. [8] 田甜.硅缓解水稻硼胁迫的效应及其土壤化学机制 [D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2022. [9] 尚双华.设施土壤氮素积累条件下番茄枯萎病发生的微生态机制研究 [D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2016. [10] 樊俊,谭军,王瑞,等.烟草青枯病发病土壤理化性状及细菌群落结构分析 [J].中国烟草科学,2021,42(6):15-21. [11] 谭军,王昌军,孟贵星,等.恩施植烟土壤理化性状对烟草青枯病发生影响的初步分析 [J].中国烟草科学,2012,33(6):93-96. [12] 陈海念.植烟土壤土传病害区土壤微生物生态特征变化及其影响因素分析 [D].贵阳:贵州大学,2020. [13] 姬佳旗.牡蛎壳粉调节土壤pH及控制烟草青枯病的效果研究 [D].重庆:西南大学,2020. [14] 龚杰,陈瑜欣,付小秋,等.土壤酸化改良剂对烟株农艺性状、 土壤pH值及青枯病发生的影响 [J].植物医生,2021,34(1):35-40. [15] 褚德朋,许永幸,高强,等.海藻多糖与有机物料对烟草青枯病的防控效果 [J].中国烟草科学,2020,41(4):58-65. [16] 祝金兰,罗艳.植烟地土壤理化性质和烟草病害发生相关性研究 [J].种子科技,2019,37(15):13,15. [17] 庞夙,陶晓秋,张英,等.会理县新植烟区土壤速效钾含量空间变异特征及其影响因子 [J].中国烟草科学,2012,33(1):32-36,42. [18] 万川,蒋珍茂,赵秀兰,等.深翻和施用土壤改良剂对烟草青枯病发生的影响 [J].烟草科技,2015,48(2):11-15,26. [19] 刘坤,周冀衡,李强,等.植烟土壤交换性钙镁含量及对烟叶钙镁含量的影响 [J].西南农业学报,2017,30(9):2065-2070. -
计量
- 文章访问数: 324
- HTML全文浏览数: 305
- PDF下载数: 142
- 施引文献: 0
下载: