From “Possession” to “Generation”:The Transformation and Implementation of Instructing and Learning Paradigm in Primary and Secondary Schools Under The Vision of “New Curriculum Standard”
-
摘要:
2022年义务教育“新课标”对核心素养的聚焦,迫使教学必须实现转型。当前,“占有”为本的教学,因其简化取向的知识观、存储取向的学习观、灌输取向的教学观,以及直接性的概念传递,致使学生停滞于符号识记,从而难以激活诗性想象、无法涵育情感理解、未能培养实践能力。而“创生”为本的教学,则以复杂取向的知识观、探究取向的学习观、适性取向的教学观,通过间接性的活动体验,促进个性潜能的激活、价值意义的深化、综合素质的建构。因此,从“占有”到“创生”的范式转向,是孕育核心素养的必然之举。为突破头脑对符号信息机械识记的桎梏,教师可采取如下策略:通过问题情境的营造,激活研究兴趣;通过知识系统的组建,提供探险资源;通过线索暗示的埋藏,导引复演历程;通过精彩表现的捕捉,延展创造空间。
Abstract:The focus and prominence of key competencies in the new curriculum standard for compulsory education in 2022 urgently requires reformation of instructing and learning. At present,possession-based instructing and learning,because of its reducing-oriented view of knowledge,storing-oriented view of learning,irrigating-oriented view of teaching,through transferring objective concepts directly,making students being stuck in symbols memorization,which is hard to active poetic imagination,to cultivate emotional understanding,and to develop practical ability. Generation-oriented instructing and learning,with its knowledge view of complex orientation,learning view of inquiring orientation and teaching view of adjustable orientation,helps students to experience activities indirectly,and promotes the burns of individual potential,the situation of valuable meaning and the construction of comprehensive qualities. The transformation from “symbolic possession” to “practical generation” is the effective approach to guide the cultivation of core literacy. In order to go beyond the shackles of memorizing symbolic information in minds,teachers could take following strategies:building problem-based surroundings to arouse researching intention,constructing knowledge system to provide exploring resources,hinting the buried clues to guide the re-finding process,capturing excellent perfor-mance to extend the space of innovation.
-
-
[1] 中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育课程方案(2022年版)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2022. [2] OECD.The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies [Executive Summary] [EB /OL].(2005-05-27)[2023-08-29].https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf. [3] 陈子丽,罗生全.从知识获得到知识创生:数字教科书建构的知识逻辑[J].教育研究与实验,2022(2):70-76. [4] 罗祖兵.从“预成”到“生成”:教学思维方式的必然选择[J].课程·教材·教法,2008(2):21-25. [5] 刘云杉.拔尖的陷阱[J].高等教育研究,2021(11):1-17. [6] 埃德加·莫兰.复杂思想:自觉的科学[M].陈一壮,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2001:270. [7] 林梓媛,魏善春.过程哲学视域中的教师发展:境遇、图景与路向[J].教师教育学报,2023(2):20-27. [8] 郭华.带领学生进入历史:“两次倒转”教学机制的理论意义[J].北京大学教育评论,2016(2):8-26. [9] 小威廉·E.多尔,M.杰恩·弗利纳,唐娜·楚伊特,等.混沌、复杂性、课程与文化(一场对话)[M].余洁,译.北京:教育科学出版社,2014. [10] 李洋洋.知识视角下的深度学习:意涵阐释、现实阻隔与进阶之路[J].中国远程教育,2022(11):58-64. [11] 周建强,杨文静.多尔后现代课程观的核心要义与思想精髓探究——基于“隐喻”与“自组织”视点[J].教师教育学报,2023(3):73-81. [12] 费多益.心身关系问题研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2018:72. [13] 约翰·杜威.学校与社会·明日之学校[M].赵祥麟,任钟印,吴志宏,译.北京:人民教育出版社,2005:121. [14] 张良,王永强.化知识为素养的教学机理、过程与要求[J].课程·教材·教法,2022(6):65-71. -
计量
- 文章访问数: 1637
- HTML全文浏览数: 1637
- PDF下载数: 198
- 施引文献: 0