Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2018 Volume 43 Issue 11
Article Contents

BAI Ying-ying1, ZHANG De-jun2, YANG Shi-qi3, WANG Yong-qian2,3, LIU Chuan1. Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors Analysis of Smog in Sichuan-Chongqing[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 43(11): 112-119. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.11.018
Citation: BAI Ying-ying1, ZHANG De-jun2, YANG Shi-qi3, WANG Yong-qian2,3, LIU Chuan1. Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors Analysis of Smog in Sichuan-Chongqing[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 43(11): 112-119. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.11.018

Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors Analysis of Smog in Sichuan-Chongqing

More Information
  • Received Date: 08/03/2018
  • The temporal and spatial distributions and long-term variation characteristics of haze were obtained for the Sichuan-Chongqing region from 1981 to 2014 by studying surface meteorological data and using the climatic statistic method. Simultaneously, the Mann-Kendall method and the Morlet wavelet analysis were used to discuss the changing trend, the change point and time period. The results show that fog days in Sichuan-Chongqing showed a downward trend, the propensity rates of two observations are -6days/10a and -8.2days/10a, respectively, the trend factors are 0.798 and 0.864, no mutation occurred during the study period. From the 1980s to the early 1990s, the main change cycle of fog days is 2 to 4 years, and after the 21st century, the main change cycle of fog days is 8 to10 years. On the contrary, the changing trend of haze days is on the rise, the propensity rates of observation is 8.2d/10a, the trend factor is 0.754, the trend of change occurred in 1997, the main change cycle of haze days is 2 to 4 yeas in 90s, and after the 21st century, the main change cycle of haze days is 4 to10 years. In discussion of the relationships between fog, haze and meteorological factors, it has been found that the trend of fog and wind speed is consistent and positively correlated with relative humidity in the whole research area, that the trend of haze and wind speed is opposite, and that it is negatively correlated with relative humidity, when considering only a single site, the results are inconsistent across site.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 中国气象局. 雾的预报等级:GB/T27964-2011[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2012.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 中国气象局. 霾的观测和预报等级:QX/T113-2010[S].北京:气象出版社, 2010.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 张英娟, 张培群, 王冀, 等. 1981-2013年京津冀持续性霾天气的气候特征[J]. 气象, 2015, 41(3):311-318.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 史军, 崔林丽. 长江三角洲城市群霾的演变特征及影响因素研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(12):2113-2122.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 吴兑, 廖碧婷, 陈慧忠, 等. 珠江三角洲地区的灰霾天气研究进展[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2014, 19(2):248-264.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 张天宇, 孙佳, 王勇, 等. 重庆雾日的气候特征及变化[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(7):1-9.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 周国兵, 向波, 胡春梅, 等. 基于自动能见度观测的雾和霾天气判别指标研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 42(10):78-83.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 唐信英, 罗磊, 王鸽, 等. 四川省大雾时空分布特征研究[J]. 高原山地气象研究[J], 2009, 29(3):60-65.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 卿海涛, 徐金霞, 马振峰, 等. 四川盆地雾霾灾害风险区划初探[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(9):1-9.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 重庆市气象局. 气象灾害标准:DB50/T 270-2008[S]. 北京:气象出版社, 2008.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 魏凤英. 现代气候统计诊断与预测技术[M]. 北京:气象出版社, 1999:69-72.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 桑燕芳, 王中根, 刘昌明. 小波分析方法在水文学研究中的应用现状及展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(9):1413-1422.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 黄先成. 近43年安阳市雾日和霾日时空特征分析[J], 河南科学, 2016, 34(3):397-403.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 王珊, 修天阳, 孙杨, 等. 1960-2012年西安地区雾霾日数与气象因素变化规律分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2014, 34(1):19-26.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 张玉成, 李亚滨. 1961-2013年黑龙江省雾霾时空分布特征及影响因子分析[J]. 黑龙江气象, 2014, 31(3):17-19, 37.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(966) PDF downloads(72) Cited by(0)

Access History

Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors Analysis of Smog in Sichuan-Chongqing

Abstract: The temporal and spatial distributions and long-term variation characteristics of haze were obtained for the Sichuan-Chongqing region from 1981 to 2014 by studying surface meteorological data and using the climatic statistic method. Simultaneously, the Mann-Kendall method and the Morlet wavelet analysis were used to discuss the changing trend, the change point and time period. The results show that fog days in Sichuan-Chongqing showed a downward trend, the propensity rates of two observations are -6days/10a and -8.2days/10a, respectively, the trend factors are 0.798 and 0.864, no mutation occurred during the study period. From the 1980s to the early 1990s, the main change cycle of fog days is 2 to 4 years, and after the 21st century, the main change cycle of fog days is 8 to10 years. On the contrary, the changing trend of haze days is on the rise, the propensity rates of observation is 8.2d/10a, the trend factor is 0.754, the trend of change occurred in 1997, the main change cycle of haze days is 2 to 4 yeas in 90s, and after the 21st century, the main change cycle of haze days is 4 to10 years. In discussion of the relationships between fog, haze and meteorological factors, it has been found that the trend of fog and wind speed is consistent and positively correlated with relative humidity in the whole research area, that the trend of haze and wind speed is opposite, and that it is negatively correlated with relative humidity, when considering only a single site, the results are inconsistent across site.

Reference (15)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return