Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2018 Volume 43 Issue 12
Article Contents

QI Ao-xue1, YANG Qing-yuan2, BI Guo-hua3, LI Jia-xin3. A Comparative Study on Coordinated Development of Social Economy and Ecological Environment of Urban Agglomeration-An Empirical Study on Three Urban Agglomerations in China[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 43(12): 75-84. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.12.014
Citation: QI Ao-xue1, YANG Qing-yuan2, BI Guo-hua3, LI Jia-xin3. A Comparative Study on Coordinated Development of Social Economy and Ecological Environment of Urban Agglomeration-An Empirical Study on Three Urban Agglomerations in China[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 43(12): 75-84. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.12.014

A Comparative Study on Coordinated Development of Social Economy and Ecological Environment of Urban Agglomeration-An Empirical Study on Three Urban Agglomerations in China

More Information
  • Received Date: 11/04/2018
  • Studying the coordinated development level of regional ecological environment and social economy from the perspective of urban agglomeration is an objective need to comply with the socio-economic transformation and development in China. To establish an evaluation index system for the coordinated development of the ecological environment and social economy of urban agglomerations based on the harmonious development relationship between the ecological environment and the social economy, panel data based on the three major urban agglomerations of Beijing, Tianjin, Yangtze River Delta, and Pearl River Delta in 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016, Comprehensive Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Coordinated Development of Eco-environment and Social Economy in Three Major City Clusters. The results show that, 1) the three major urban agglomerations experienced slower ecological and socio-economic development between 2008 and 2016. 2) the ecological environment and socio-economic development of the three major urban agglomerations are generally in a state of incoordination. The f(x) and g(x) values in most cities are significantly different. 3) there is a large gap between the coordinated development of the three major urban agglomerations in the ecological environment and social economy. In accordance with the regional core competitiveness and the practical problems faced in its development, it is necessary to formulate a transformation strategy.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 盖美, 连冬, 耿雅冬. 辽宁省经济与生态环境系统耦合发展分析[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2013(5):88-94.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 徐肇忠. 城市环境规划[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社, 1999:60.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 赵永平. 中国城镇化演进轨迹、现实困境与转型方向[J]. 经济问题探索, 2016(5):130-137.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 张建强, 赵玉强, 戴本林, 等. 成都市生态环境与社会经济协调发展分析[J]. 灾害学, 2007(1):129-133.

    Google Scholar

    [5] ZHANG L, ZHANG D. Relationship Between Ecological Civilizationand Balanced Population Development in China[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 5:2532-2535.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 王泪娟. 我国发展低碳经济的必要性分析:基于环境库兹涅茨曲线[J]. 知识经济, 2010(24):72-73.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 冯刚. 经济发展与环境保护关系研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2008, 7(4):48-53.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 王玉庆. 浅谈经济发展和环境保护的关系(上)[J]. 环境保护, 1994(1):39-41.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 曹新. 经济发展与环境保护关系研究[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2004(2):60-64.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 杜湘红, 张涛. 水资源环境与社会经济系统耦合发展的仿真模拟——以洞庭湖生态经济区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(9):1109-1115.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 张俊凤, 徐梦洁, 郑华伟, 等. 城市扩张用地社会经济效益与生态环境效益动态关系研究——以南京市为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(3):306-311.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 刘满凤, 刘玉凤. 基于多目标规划的鄱阳湖生态经济区资源环境与社会经济协调发展研究[J]. 生态经济, 2017, 33(5):100-105, 159.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 侯国林, 黄震方. 旅游地社区参与度熵权层次分析评价模型与应用[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(10):1802-1813.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 易平, 方世明. 地质公园社会经济与生态环境效益耦合协调度研究——以嵩山世界地质公园为例[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(1):206-216.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 廖重斌. 环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系——以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J]. 广州环境科学, 1996, 11(1):12-16.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 严登华, 何岩, 邓伟, 等. 生态环境与社会经济发展协调性模型研究[J]. 环境与开发, 2000, 15(3):5-7.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 张引, 杨庆媛, 闵婕. 重庆市新型城镇化质量与生态环境承载力耦合分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(5):817-828.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 张光宏, 马艳. 城郊土地利用社会经济效益和生态环境效益的动态耦合关系——以武汉市远城区为例[J]. 农业技术经济, 2014(11):14-20.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 梁红梅, 刘卫东, 刘会平, 等. 深圳市土地利用社会经济效益与生态环境效益的耦合关系研究[J]. 地理科学, 2008, 28(5):636-641.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 崔木花. 中原城市群9市城镇化与生态环境耦合协调关系[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(7):72-78.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 乔标, 方创琳, 黄金川. 干旱区城市化与生态环境交互耦合的规律性及其验证[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(7):2183-2190.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 黄木易, 程志光. 区域城市化与社会经济耦合协调发展度的时空特征分析——以安徽省为例[J]. 经济地理, 2012, 32(2):77-81.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 李磊, 张贵祥. 京津冀城市群内城市发展质量[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(5):61-64, 8.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(963) PDF downloads(94) Cited by(0)

Access History

A Comparative Study on Coordinated Development of Social Economy and Ecological Environment of Urban Agglomeration-An Empirical Study on Three Urban Agglomerations in China

Abstract: Studying the coordinated development level of regional ecological environment and social economy from the perspective of urban agglomeration is an objective need to comply with the socio-economic transformation and development in China. To establish an evaluation index system for the coordinated development of the ecological environment and social economy of urban agglomerations based on the harmonious development relationship between the ecological environment and the social economy, panel data based on the three major urban agglomerations of Beijing, Tianjin, Yangtze River Delta, and Pearl River Delta in 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016, Comprehensive Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Coordinated Development of Eco-environment and Social Economy in Three Major City Clusters. The results show that, 1) the three major urban agglomerations experienced slower ecological and socio-economic development between 2008 and 2016. 2) the ecological environment and socio-economic development of the three major urban agglomerations are generally in a state of incoordination. The f(x) and g(x) values in most cities are significantly different. 3) there is a large gap between the coordinated development of the three major urban agglomerations in the ecological environment and social economy. In accordance with the regional core competitiveness and the practical problems faced in its development, it is necessary to formulate a transformation strategy.

Reference (23)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return