Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2022 Volume 1 Issue 2
Article Contents

LYU Chaojun, ZHONG Baozhu, LI Chaoxu, et al. Effect of Different Uses of Sticky Card on Trapping Pests in Areca Field[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (2): 59-63. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.009
Citation: LYU Chaojun, ZHONG Baozhu, LI Chaoxu, et al. Effect of Different Uses of Sticky Card on Trapping Pests in Areca Field[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (2): 59-63. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.009

Effect of Different Uses of Sticky Card on Trapping Pests in Areca Field

More Information
  • Received Date: 10/01/2022
  • MSC: S476;S792.91

  • In order to popularize the physical control technology for piercing-sucking pests in areca farm, effect of yellow sticky card to control pests under different hanging height and density were evaluated. The results indicated that the hanging position affected the trapping effect of sticky card. Areca tree with height of about 7 m was used as the test object, the effect of hanging on the crown of tree (in the petiole of the last 1~3 leaf from crown) was the best. The average number of thrips, leafhoppers, whiteflies and aphids trapped per sticky board was 7.84, 6.52, 11.84 and 6.76, respectively, while the effect of hanging in the middle (3~4 m from the ground) and lower part (1.5~2 m from the ground) of the trunk was poor. The average number of insects per sticky board in the lower position treatment was only 2.80, 1.76, 4.16 and 2.48, respectively. The results of different hanging density tests showed that the effects of 1 piece/plant, 1 piece/2 plant and 1 piece/3 plant were better. Taking the number of thrips trapped as an example, the average total number of insects trapped by the three treatments were 41.33, 42.33 and 37.67, respectively. Considering the trapping effect and use cost, the effect of 1 piece/3 plant was the best. In conclusion, when using yellow sticky insect board to control piercing-sucking insects in betel nut garden, the best control effect can be achieved by hanging 1 piece/3 plants under the crown of the tree.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 金书秦.关于“十三五”实现农药零增长目标的几点思考[J].农药科学与管理,2016,37(2):1-3.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 张潇引,王彬力,刘超,等.不同颜色粘虫板对茶园小贯小绿叶蝉等昆虫的诱集效果比较研究[J].茶叶通讯,2021,48(4):663-670.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 俞波,沈卫新,郑鹏华.一种新型粘虫板对生草梨园害虫的防治效果初探[J].中国果树,2021(9):48-51.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 玄志友.应用实蝇粘虫板防控桔小实蝇[J].中国果业信息,2021,38(11):63.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 彭四华,连宇阳,曾贝,等.高温季节粘虫板对百香果实蝇诱集效果评价[J].海南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,34(2):154-158.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 唐庆华,宋薇薇,于少帅,等.槟榔黄化病病原研究及防控中存在的问题及展望[J].植物保护,2021,47(4):6-11.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 牛晓庆,林兆威,杨德洁,等.海南万宁槟榔黄叶病毒病发生情况和症状分析[J].热带作物学报,2021,42(11):3073-3078.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 于少帅,宋薇薇,覃伟权.海南槟榔黄化植原体分子检测及其系统发育关系研究[J].热带作物学报,2021,42(11):3066-3072.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 孟秀利,宋薇薇,唐庆华,等.槟榔主要病虫害研究进展[J].热带作物学报,2021,42(11):3055-3065.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 钟宝珠,吕朝军,覃伟权,等.不同种类色板与添加物协同对槟榔园害虫诱集的初步效果[J].植物保护,2020,46(5):286-289.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 秦焕荣,刘珠珠,贺亚红,等.粘虫板不同颜色和悬挂高度对葡萄园绿盲蝽的诱集效果[J].中国植保导刊,2020,40(8):57-59.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 徐鵾鸬,冯卫虎,晁倩林,等.不同种类粘虫板悬挂密度对茶小绿叶蝉种群数量的影响[J].茶叶学报,2019,60(3):119-121.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 王玮,王胜永,李宝辉,等.粘虫板不同挂板方式对苹果绣线菊蚜诱杀效果的影响[J].中国果树,2019(5):77-81.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 王崇颖.海南槟榔黄化病的发生及综合防控对策[J].中国热带农业,2019(5):29-31.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 梁慧明.黏虫板在虫害防治中的应用研究[J].农家参谋,2017(21):53.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 杨朴丽.不同颜色黏虫板对葡萄园绿盲蝽的诱集效果[J].中国果业信息,2014,31(4):60.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 钟海英,张珏锋,陈建明,等.不同颜色粘虫板对茭白长绿飞虱的诱杀效果[J].浙江农业科学,2016,57(10):1642-1643,1652.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 景瑞,阎雄飞,张鹏,等.粘虫板颜色和悬挂方式对枣飞象诱集效果的影响[J].应用昆虫学报,2021,58(6):1426-1432.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 云天海,肖日新,黄文枫,等.黄色黏虫板诱杀技术在辣椒蚜虫绿色防控上的应用[J].湖北农业科学,2014,53(1):79-80.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 时晓芳,白先进,谢太理,等.一年两收栽培模式下粘虫板对葡萄蓟马诱杀效果[J].西南农业学报,2017,30(12):2654-2658.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 杜玉宁,黄慧玲,王晓菁,等.粘虫板在不同时间空间条件下对温室蓟马诱杀作用[J].北方园艺,2015(12):100-102.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 陈强,欧丽萍,梁永游,等.黄色粘虫板与杀虫剂配合对番茄白粉虱的控制作用研究[J].安徽农业科学,2013,41(22):9321-9323.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(857) PDF downloads(773) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Effect of Different Uses of Sticky Card on Trapping Pests in Areca Field

Abstract: In order to popularize the physical control technology for piercing-sucking pests in areca farm, effect of yellow sticky card to control pests under different hanging height and density were evaluated. The results indicated that the hanging position affected the trapping effect of sticky card. Areca tree with height of about 7 m was used as the test object, the effect of hanging on the crown of tree (in the petiole of the last 1~3 leaf from crown) was the best. The average number of thrips, leafhoppers, whiteflies and aphids trapped per sticky board was 7.84, 6.52, 11.84 and 6.76, respectively, while the effect of hanging in the middle (3~4 m from the ground) and lower part (1.5~2 m from the ground) of the trunk was poor. The average number of insects per sticky board in the lower position treatment was only 2.80, 1.76, 4.16 and 2.48, respectively. The results of different hanging density tests showed that the effects of 1 piece/plant, 1 piece/2 plant and 1 piece/3 plant were better. Taking the number of thrips trapped as an example, the average total number of insects trapped by the three treatments were 41.33, 42.33 and 37.67, respectively. Considering the trapping effect and use cost, the effect of 1 piece/3 plant was the best. In conclusion, when using yellow sticky insect board to control piercing-sucking insects in betel nut garden, the best control effect can be achieved by hanging 1 piece/3 plants under the crown of the tree.

Reference (22)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return