Search Advanced

Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2022 Volume 1 Issue 3
Article Contents
Previous Article Next Article

ZHANG Huanhuan, LI Lu, XIANG Dong. Evaluation of Field Control Efficacy of Several Fungicides Against Apple Powdery Mildew in Nyingchi[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (3): 67-73. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.03.010
Citation: ZHANG Huanhuan, LI Lu, XIANG Dong. Evaluation of Field Control Efficacy of Several Fungicides Against Apple Powdery Mildew in Nyingchi[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (3): 67-73. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.03.010
shu

Evaluation of Field Control Efficacy of Several Fungicides Against Apple Powdery Mildew in Nyingchi

  • 1. Institute of Vegetable, Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa 850000, China;

  • 2. Institute of Agriculture Product Quality Standard and Testing Research, Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa 850000, China

More Information
  • Received Date: 16/02/2022

  • MSC: SS432.4+4

  • In order to effectively control the apple powdery mildew, the effective fungicides suitable for local production were screened. In this study, the field control efficacy test of ten kinds of fungicides against powdery mildew of apple was carried out in the orchard of Mirui township, Bayi District, Nyingchi City. The results showed that the best control effect was achieved by 40% mycloxazole WP with more than 80% of control effect at 14 d after the third application. The 50% sulfur JG, 30% hexazole ethyl phenol ME, 300 g/L etherithoxylateridyl SC and 80% sulfur WG also achieved more than 70% of control efficacy at 14 days after the third application. Therefore, the above five agents can be used as the first choice for the control of powdery mildew, and can be used alternately in the orchard. The results provide theoretical basis for the effective prevention and control of the disease.
  • 加载中
  • [1] XU X M, BUTT D J. Effects of Temperature and Atmospheric Moisture on the Early Growth of Apple Powdery Mildew (podosphaera leucotricha) Colonies[J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 1998, 104(2):133-140.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 李随院, 高立强, 杨家荣, 等. 渭北西部苹果白粉病发病特点研究初报[J]. 西北农业学报, 2004, 13(4):37-40.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 段淋渊, 周军, 王大玮, 等. 苹果白粉病危害防治及抗性资源研究进展[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2015, 35(5):104-109.

    Google Scholar

    [4] BURCHILLR T. Powdery Mildews of Tree Crops[M]. The Powdery Mildews, 1987:482-483.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 罗昌国, 袁启凤, 裴晓红, 等. 富士苹果MdWRKY40b基因克隆及其对白粉病的抗性分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(12):2382-2387.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 都贝贝, 陈秀孔, 杜小丽, 等. 苹果白粉病的抗性评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(31):256-259.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 刘红彦, 李好海, 刘玉霞, 等. 果树病虫害诊治原色图谱[M]. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社, 2013:3-79.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 相栋, 徐秉良, 王森山, 等. 西藏果树病虫害种类及发生情况调查[J]. 中国果树, 2020(2):130-136.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 胡清玉, 胡同乐, 王亚南, 等. 中国苹果病害发生与分布现状调查[J]. 植物保护, 2016, 42(1):175-179.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 王小倩, 李文妮, 来顺宇. 苹果白粉病的发生规律与防治对策[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2015, 31(11):201, 213.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 闫相如, 张瑜, 胡同乐, 等. 导致苹果白粉病严重发生的关键气象因素分析[J]. 河北林果研究, 2017, 32(2):155-163.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 盛宝钦, 冯思坤, 杨儒琳, 等. 树势和氮磷钾肥对苹果树白粉病的影响[J]. 中国果树, 1991(3):35-36.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 郑伟, 王彬, 吴亚维, 等. 不同杀菌剂对苹果白粉病病菌的室内毒力测定[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(9):131-132.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 郑伟, 吴亚维, 王彬, 等. 6种杀菌剂防治苹果白粉病田间药效试验(英文)[J]. 农业科学与技术(英文版), 2014, 15(3):427-431.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 李继平, 李青青, 李建军. 6种杀菌剂防治苹果白粉病田间药效评价[J]. 中国果树, 2007(3):29-31.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 刘振中, 王雷存, 高华, 等. 苹果白粉病抗性研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012, 27(4):177-180.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 王树桐, 王亚南, 曹克强. 近年我国重要苹果病害发生概况及研究进展[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(5):13-25, 50.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 鄢洪海. 80%硫磺水分散粒剂防治苹果白粉病初报[J]. 中国果树, 2009(3):39-42.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 孙芹, 兰杰, 司乃国. 18%烯肟菌酯·氟环唑悬浮剂防治苹果树病害的田间应用[J]. 农药, 2019, 58(12):905-907.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 普继雄, 马桂梅, 孙秀梅, 等. 防治苹果白粉病的新型药剂室内毒力测定及田间药效试验[J].中国果树, 2021(11):58-60.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 赵云和, 仵继刚, 郎兆光, 等. 20%烯肟菌胺·戊唑醇悬浮剂对几种苹果主要病害的防治[J].农药, 2010, 49(12):927-929.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 司乃国, 刘君丽, 杨瑞秀, 等. 新杀菌剂烯肟菌胺(SYP-1620)对苹果病害的防治效果[J]. 农药, 2008, 47(8):561-562, 568.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(1707) PDF downloads(1568) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Evaluation of Field Control Efficacy of Several Fungicides Against Apple Powdery Mildew in Nyingchi

  • Received Date: 16/02/2022

Abstract: In order to effectively control the apple powdery mildew, the effective fungicides suitable for local production were screened. In this study, the field control efficacy test of ten kinds of fungicides against powdery mildew of apple was carried out in the orchard of Mirui township, Bayi District, Nyingchi City. The results showed that the best control effect was achieved by 40% mycloxazole WP with more than 80% of control effect at 14 d after the third application. The 50% sulfur JG, 30% hexazole ethyl phenol ME, 300 g/L etherithoxylateridyl SC and 80% sulfur WG also achieved more than 70% of control efficacy at 14 days after the third application. Therefore, the above five agents can be used as the first choice for the control of powdery mildew, and can be used alternately in the orchard. The results provide theoretical basis for the effective prevention and control of the disease.

    HTML

Reference (22)

Catalog

    Copyright PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE

    Address：Journal Press of Southwest University, Beibei District, Chongqing Tel：023-68250657 E-mail：zhiwuyixue@sina.com

    Supported by:Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return