Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2022 Volume 1 Issue 4
Article Contents

LIU Chong, TAO Wen-cai, DENG Xiao-yue, et al. Effect of Three Rice Materials on the Growth,Development and Fecundity of White-Backed Planthopper Sogatella furcifera Based on the Two-Sex Life Table[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (4): 52-59. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.04.007
Citation: LIU Chong, TAO Wen-cai, DENG Xiao-yue, et al. Effect of Three Rice Materials on the Growth,Development and Fecundity of White-Backed Planthopper Sogatella furcifera Based on the Two-Sex Life Table[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (4): 52-59. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.04.007

Effect of Three Rice Materials on the Growth,Development and Fecundity of White-Backed Planthopper Sogatella furcifera Based on the Two-Sex Life Table

More Information
  • Received Date: 01/05/2022
  • MSC: S435.112+.3

  • In this paper, the effect of three rice materials on the growth, development and fecundity of white-backed planthopper was studied based on the Two-sex life table technique. The results showed that compared with the insect-susceptible material ‘TN1’, the insect-resistant material ‘79-1163’ and ‘S1022’ significantly affected the development duration and adult life span of white-backed planthopper. ‘79-1163’ significantly prolonged the pre-adult stage, and ‘S1022’ and ‘79-1163’ significantly reduced the adult life span. The nymph survival rate, fecundity, intrinsic increase rate, finite increase rate, and net reproductive rate of white-backed planthopper fed on ‘79-1633’ were significantly lower than those of on ‘TN1’, also ‘S1022’. The white-backed planthopper fed on the three materials mostly developed into long-winged type. The sex ratio of white-backed planthopper fed on ‘TN1’ and ‘S1022’ were higher than 1, except for ‘79-116’. Both rice materials ‘79-1633’ and ‘S1022’ showed antibiotic resistance to white-backed planthopper, and ‘79-1633’ showed more obvious antibiotic resistance than ‘S1022’. The results are of great significance for the analysis of resistance mechanism to white back planthopper and discovery of resistance genes in rice.
  • 加载中
  • [1] ZHOU G H,WEN J,CAI D J,et al.Southern Rice Black-Streaked Dwarf Virus:a New Proposed Fijivirus Species in the Family Reoviridae [J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2008,53(23):3677-3685.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 贺鸣,陈卓,金林红,等.南方水稻黑条矮缩病传毒介体白背飞虱的传毒特性及互作分子机制研究进展 [J].中国植保导刊,2013,33(11):22-25.

    Google Scholar

    [3] YANG L,ZHANG W L.Genetic and Biochemical Mechanisms of Rice Resistance to Planthopper [J].Plant Cell Reports,2016,35(8):1559-1572.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 弓少龙,侯茂林.水稻对褐飞虱和白背飞虱的抗性及其机制研究进展 [J].植物保护,2017,43(1):15-23.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 刘芳,戴志一,胡国文,等.不同类型水稻品种对白背飞虱忌避性、 抗生性和耐害性的测定 [J].中国水稻科学,1998,12(3):189-192.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 刘光杰,沈君辉,寒川一成,等.水稻品种抗白背飞虱鉴定的定量指标 [J].植物保护学报,2003,30(2):153-160.

    Google Scholar

    [7] GOLIZADEH A,RAZMJOU J.Life Table Parameters of Phthorimaea Operculella (Lepidoptera:Gelechiidae),Feeding on Tubers of Six Potato Cultivars [J].Journal of Economic Entomology,2010,103(3):966-972.

    Google Scholar

    [8] BERNARDI D,GARCIA M S,BOTTON M,et al.Biology and Fertility Life Table of the Green Aphid Chaetosiphon Fragaefolli on Strawberry Cultivars [J].Journal of Insect Science,2012,12(1):28.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 胡昌雄,范苇,张倩,等.基于两性生命表和年龄-阶段捕食率的南方小花蝽对西花蓟马的控制作用 [J].中国农业科学,2021,54(13):2769-2780.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 蒋春先,税玲,蒲颇,等.基于两性生命表的以朱砂叶螨为猎物的加州新小绥螨四川种群生长发育、 繁殖及捕食率 [J].中国生物防治学报,2019,35(3):364-373.

    Google Scholar

    [11] CHI H,YANG T C.Two-Sex Life Table and Predation Rate of Propylaea Japonica Thunberg (Coleoptera:Coccinellidae) Fed on Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) [J].Environmental Entomology,2003,32(2):327-333.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 唐健,胡国文,马巨法,等.应用主分量分析评价水稻品种对白背飞虱抗生性初探 [J].中国水稻科学,1991,5(3):142-144.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 程正新,黄所生,吴碧球,等.不同水稻品种对白背飞虱取食和产卵选择性的影响 [J].环境昆虫学报,2016,38(6):1084-1089.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 王梁全,李兰秀,陈连举,等.几个水稻新品种(系)对褐飞虱的抗性评价 [J].中国农学通报,2009,25(20):253-257.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 陈桂华,张发成,盛仙俏,等.水稻品种对褐飞虱的田间抗性及其生态学机制 [J].应用昆虫学报,2011,48(5):1354-1358.

    Google Scholar

    [16] KHAN Z R,SAXENA R C.Behavioral and Physiological Responses of Sogatella Furcifera (Homoptera:Delphacidae) to Selected Resistant and Susceptible Rice Cultivars [J].Journal of Economic Entomology,1985,78(6):1280-1286.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 董亚强,李强,尤民生,等.转cry1Ab抗虫水稻对褐飞虱取食及产卵选择行为的影响 [J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2016,45(3):252-256.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 胡国文,朱明华.白背飞虱短翅型雄虫的观察 [J].昆虫知识,1981,18(4):154-156.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(503) PDF downloads(458) Cited by(0)

Access History

Effect of Three Rice Materials on the Growth,Development and Fecundity of White-Backed Planthopper Sogatella furcifera Based on the Two-Sex Life Table

Abstract: In this paper, the effect of three rice materials on the growth, development and fecundity of white-backed planthopper was studied based on the Two-sex life table technique. The results showed that compared with the insect-susceptible material ‘TN1’, the insect-resistant material ‘79-1163’ and ‘S1022’ significantly affected the development duration and adult life span of white-backed planthopper. ‘79-1163’ significantly prolonged the pre-adult stage, and ‘S1022’ and ‘79-1163’ significantly reduced the adult life span. The nymph survival rate, fecundity, intrinsic increase rate, finite increase rate, and net reproductive rate of white-backed planthopper fed on ‘79-1633’ were significantly lower than those of on ‘TN1’, also ‘S1022’. The white-backed planthopper fed on the three materials mostly developed into long-winged type. The sex ratio of white-backed planthopper fed on ‘TN1’ and ‘S1022’ were higher than 1, except for ‘79-116’. Both rice materials ‘79-1633’ and ‘S1022’ showed antibiotic resistance to white-backed planthopper, and ‘79-1633’ showed more obvious antibiotic resistance than ‘S1022’. The results are of great significance for the analysis of resistance mechanism to white back planthopper and discovery of resistance genes in rice.

Reference (18)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return