Search Advanced

Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2023 Volume 2 Issue 2
Article Contents
Previous Article Next Article

LIU Hui, ZHUO Fuyan, GUO Rong, et al. Evaluation of the Contribution Rate of Plant Protection on Control of Rice Crop Pestsin 2022[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, (2): 18-26. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2023.02.003
Citation: LIU Hui, ZHUO Fuyan, GUO Rong, et al. Evaluation of the Contribution Rate of Plant Protection on Control of Rice Crop Pestsin 2022[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, (2): 18-26. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2023.02.003
shu

Evaluation of the Contribution Rate of Plant Protection on Control of Rice Crop Pestsin 2022

  • 1. National Agricultural Technology Extension and Service Center, National Agricultural Technology Integrated Innovation Center, Beijing 100125, China;

  • 2. Heilongjiang Plant Quarantine and Plant Protection Station, Harbin 150036, China;

  • 3. Jiangsu Plant Protection and Plant Quarantine Station, Nanjing 210013, China;

  • 4. Jiangxi Agricultural and Rural Industrial Development Service Center, Nanchang 330096, China;

  • 5. Hunan Plant Protection and Plant Quarantine Station, Changsha 410006, China;

  • 6. Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Plant Protection Station, Nanning 530022, China;

  • 7. Sichuan Plant Protection Station, Chengdu 610041, China

More Information
  • Received Date: 18/02/2023

  • MSC: S435.11

  • Rice is one of the major grain crops in China. It is the key measure for prevention and controlling rice diseases and pests to ensure the rice yield and increase farmers' income， reduce the yield losses and increase production efficiency. National Agricultural Technology Extension and Service Center (NATESC) organized the evaluation of the contribution rate of plant protection for rice crop in six provinces (autonomous region)， including Heilongjiang， Jiangsu， Jiangxi， Hunan， Guangxi and Sichuan. The contribution rate of plant protection for controlling the insect pests and diseases of the rice crop was 19.46% assessed by the method of multi-point test with four treatments， strict prevention and control area， unified control area， farmers' self-prevention area， and non-control area in 2022. According to the assessment， plant protection retrieved a loss of 4，141.90 million tons of rice. The results of statistical analysis show that the rates of strict prevention and control area treatment， unified control area treatment were 8.97% and 4.35% higher than that of farmers' self-prevention area treatment， respectively.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 国家统计局年度数据[EB/OL].[2023-02-10]. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 李建平. 稻米产量稳定增长[J]. 农产品市场, 2021(9):22.

    Google Scholar

    [3] OERKE E C. Crop Losses to Pests[J]. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2006, 144(1):31-43.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 刘万才, 刘振东, 黄冲, 等. 近10年农作物主要病虫害发生危害情况的统计和分析[J]. 植物保护, 2016, 42(5):1-9, 46.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 刘梦泽, 胡惠娟, 刘正, 等. 水稻纹枯病危害损失测定[J]. 湖北植保, 2012(3):20-22.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 许云和, 吴社高, 曾纪康, 等. 水稻纹枯病危害损失测定与药剂防治技术改进措施[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2002(4):51-52.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 丁克坚, 檀根甲, 胡劲松, 等. 稻曲病危害对水稻产量损失的影响[J]. 植物保护, 1997, 23(1):3-6.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 蒙显标, 陆寿成, 陈强, 等. 水稻恶苗病穗期危害损失估计模型研究初报[J]. 广西植保, 1992, 5(1):11-14.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 张景飞, 瞿燕, 龚良. 五、六代灰飞虱危害水稻穗部损失测定初报[J]. 上海农业科技, 2005(6):125.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 肖晓华, 刘春, 吴洪华, 等. 水稻主栽品种稻飞虱危害损失测定[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2011(3):54-58.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 张礼生, 郑根昌. 稻水蝇危害水稻产量损失研究[J]. 植物保护, 2002, 28(1):15-18.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 黄秀兰, 李建丰, 张华, 等. 水稻主要病虫危害损失和专业化防治效果初步研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2011, 38(20):68-70.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 毛建辉, 刘万才, 何忠全, 等. 水稻主要病虫综合危害损失评估试验初探[J]. 西南农业学报, 2012, 25(5):1662-1667.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 林文忠, 任厚彬, 刘巍巍. 普兰店市水稻病虫草综合危害损失评估试验研究[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2014(4):53-55.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 刘万才. 试论植物保护贡献率的测算方法[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2021, 41(8):5-8.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 张齐凤, 王春荣, 司兆胜, 等. 2020年黑龙江省水稻病虫害发生特点与分析[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2021(4):215-218.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 司兆胜, 宋显东, 吕涛, 等. 2021年黑龙江省主要农作物病虫害发生情况分析[J]. 中国农技推广, 2022, 38(9):90-92.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(894) PDF downloads(578) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Evaluation of the Contribution Rate of Plant Protection on Control of Rice Crop Pestsin 2022

  • Received Date: 18/02/2023

Abstract: Rice is one of the major grain crops in China. It is the key measure for prevention and controlling rice diseases and pests to ensure the rice yield and increase farmers' income， reduce the yield losses and increase production efficiency. National Agricultural Technology Extension and Service Center (NATESC) organized the evaluation of the contribution rate of plant protection for rice crop in six provinces (autonomous region)， including Heilongjiang， Jiangsu， Jiangxi， Hunan， Guangxi and Sichuan. The contribution rate of plant protection for controlling the insect pests and diseases of the rice crop was 19.46% assessed by the method of multi-point test with four treatments， strict prevention and control area， unified control area， farmers' self-prevention area， and non-control area in 2022. According to the assessment， plant protection retrieved a loss of 4，141.90 million tons of rice. The results of statistical analysis show that the rates of strict prevention and control area treatment， unified control area treatment were 8.97% and 4.35% higher than that of farmers' self-prevention area treatment， respectively.

    HTML

Reference (17)

Catalog

    Copyright PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE

    Address：Journal Press of Southwest University, Beibei District, Chongqing Tel：023-68250657 E-mail：zhiwuyixue@sina.com

    Supported by:Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return