Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2023 Volume 2 Issue 2
Article Contents

TENG Xiaofeng, ZHAO Hong, PENG Lixin, et al. Field Efficacy of EmamectinSingle Agent and Its Compound Against Spodoptera frugiperda in Maize Grassland[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, (2): 55-58. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2023.02.008
Citation: TENG Xiaofeng, ZHAO Hong, PENG Lixin, et al. Field Efficacy of EmamectinSingle Agent and Its Compound Against Spodoptera frugiperda in Maize Grassland[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, (2): 55-58. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2023.02.008

Field Efficacy of EmamectinSingle Agent and Its Compound Against Spodoptera frugiperda in Maize Grassland

More Information
  • Received Date: 20/03/2023
  • MSC: S435.132

  • In order to improve the effect on control of Spodoptera frugiperda in maize grassland and delay the development of chemical resistance in Spodoptera frugiperda, single agent of emamectin, compound agent of emamectin and synergizing agent of emamectin were selected for the field experiment. The results showed that under the condition of ensuring the safety of crops, four kinds of chemical treatments were applied (treatment A: 5% metrel salt + synergist emery, treatment B: 5% Metrel salt, treatment C: 30% metrel-indocarb, treatment D: 15% Metrel. The adjusted death ratesat 3 days after treatment reached 84.21% to 87.27%, among which A treatment was the highest, but there was no significant difference among the treatments. After 15 days of application, the growth rates of damaged maize in A, B, C and D treatments were 1.54%, 6.15%, 4.92% and 4.15%, respectively, which were lower than that of 15.5% in CK treatment. The treatment A with the higher mortality and the lower growth rate is with good potential in control of Spodoptera frugiperda.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 李翱, 岳元保, 丁家盛, 等. 芒市鲜食玉米草地贪夜蛾发生特点及防控技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2022(3):105-107.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 江幸福, 张蕾, 程云霞, 等. 草地贪夜蛾迁飞行为与监测技术研究进展[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(1):12-18.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 杨普云, 朱晓明, 郭井菲, 等. 我国草地贪夜蛾的防控对策与建议[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(4):1-6.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 夏志刚, 虞前线. 不同药剂防治玉米草地贪夜蛾田间药效试验[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(14):85-87.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 汪磊. 5种常见药剂对玉米草地贪夜蛾田间防效研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(5):133-134.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 王芹芹, 崔丽, 王立, 等. 草地贪夜蛾对杀虫剂的抗性研究进展[J]. 农药学学报, 2019, 21(4):401-408.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(453) PDF downloads(199) Cited by(0)

Access History

Field Efficacy of EmamectinSingle Agent and Its Compound Against Spodoptera frugiperda in Maize Grassland

Abstract: In order to improve the effect on control of Spodoptera frugiperda in maize grassland and delay the development of chemical resistance in Spodoptera frugiperda, single agent of emamectin, compound agent of emamectin and synergizing agent of emamectin were selected for the field experiment. The results showed that under the condition of ensuring the safety of crops, four kinds of chemical treatments were applied (treatment A: 5% metrel salt + synergist emery, treatment B: 5% Metrel salt, treatment C: 30% metrel-indocarb, treatment D: 15% Metrel. The adjusted death ratesat 3 days after treatment reached 84.21% to 87.27%, among which A treatment was the highest, but there was no significant difference among the treatments. After 15 days of application, the growth rates of damaged maize in A, B, C and D treatments were 1.54%, 6.15%, 4.92% and 4.15%, respectively, which were lower than that of 15.5% in CK treatment. The treatment A with the higher mortality and the lower growth rate is with good potential in control of Spodoptera frugiperda.

Reference (6)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return