Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2023 Volume 2 Issue 5
Article Contents

ZHOU Bingying, LIU Xia, HUANG Puxin, et al. Study on Rhizosphere Soil Microorganism and Soil Fertility of Cinnamomum camphora (Linn) Presl Trees planted in Different Times and Places[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, (5): 41-50. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2023.05.005
Citation: ZHOU Bingying, LIU Xia, HUANG Puxin, et al. Study on Rhizosphere Soil Microorganism and Soil Fertility of Cinnamomum camphora (Linn) Presl Trees planted in Different Times and Places[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, (5): 41-50. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2023.05.005

Study on Rhizosphere Soil Microorganism and Soil Fertility of Cinnamomum camphora (Linn) Presl Trees planted in Different Times and Places

More Information
  • Received Date: 10/10/2023
  • MSC: S158;S687.1

  • Taking Cinnamomum camphora (Linn) Presl planted at different times and locations in Jiulongpo District and Jinyun Mountain of Chongqing as the test objects, the differences on the quantity of rhizosphere soil microbes and soil chemical properties of C. camphora (Linn) Presl were analyzed by coating plate and soil chemical properties determination, and the comprehensive soil fertility was evaluated. The results showed that the number of bacteria in the rhizosphere soil microorganisms of C. camphora was the highest, and the number of bacteria and actinomycetes decreased with the increase of cultivation years. The soil of C. camphora street trees in Jiulongpo District of Chongqing is alkaline, with pH of 8.11~8.13, and low organic matter content. The rhizosphere soil of C. camphora in Jinyun Mountain is alkaline, with pH ranging from 5.2 to 6.46, among which the content of organic matter in Jinyun Mountain-20 was the highest. The analysis of various indicators showed that the soil fertility and fertility of C. camphora (Linn) Presl tree soil in Jiulongpo District and Jinyun Mountain of Chongqing were at a general level. The soil fertility of street trees in Jiulongpo District was lower than that in Jinyun Mountain. The results of this study provide a scientific basis for the cultivation and conservation of street trees in urban areas by comparing the soil environment of C. camphora (Linn) Presl in different locations.
  • 加载中
  • [1] LEUNG S K. Street Trees and Their City:Rethinking Tree Practices for the Fluctuating City of New Orleans, Louisiana, USA[J]. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 2023, 11(1):86-95.

    Google Scholar

    [2] SUI Q Y, JIA H Z, ZHAO M Y, et al. Quantitative Evaluation of Ecosystem Services of Urban Street Trees:A Case Study of Shengjing Historical and Cultural Block in Shenyang, China[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(3):2532.

    Google Scholar

    [3] WANG L, TIAN W X, ZHENG P L. Review of the Numerical Simulation of the Wind and Pollutant Diffusion in Urban Street Canyon under the Influence of Trees[J]. Buildings, 2023, 13(4):1088.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 刘毅, 周国兵, 孙俊, 等. 1971-2018年重庆地区高温的气候特征[J]. 成都信息工程大学学报, 2021, 36(3):349-354.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 陈林君. 基于改善重庆主城人行道微气候舒适度的行道树优化配置研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2021.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 邓永成, 史红文, 李苗, 等. 武汉主城区常见行道树降温增湿效应研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2020(10):86-89.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 周鞠蕊, 秦华. 重庆市中心城区行道树结构特征及绿化现状分析[J]. 林业调查规划, 2022, 47(3):190-195.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 陈霜, 王胜. 重庆园林常用的常绿乔木树种应用[J]. 绿色科技, 2018(23):120-121.

    Google Scholar

    [9] TAN X Y, SHIBATA S. Influence of Soil Properties on Street Tree Performance in Kyoto City, Japan[J]. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2023, 19(4):573-582.

    Google Scholar

    [10] GHOSH S, SCHARENBROCH B C, BURCHAM D, et al. Influence of Soil Properties on Street Tree Attributes in Singapore[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2016, 19(2):949-967.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 贺坤, 宋婷, 王本耀, 等. 上海市行道树土壤理化性质与树木健康的相关性研究[J]. 中国园林, 2022, 38(2):66-70.

    Google Scholar

    [12] TAO C Y, LI R, XIONG W, et al. Bio-Organic Fertilizers Stimulate Indigenous Soil Pseudomonas Populations to Enhance Plant Disease Suppression[J]. Microbiome, 2020, 8(1):137.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 张均华 孔 秦 朱 田 朱 虞. 土壤微生物影响土壤健康的作用机制研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, (2023-06-26)[2023-09-10] https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=KaAwsYWd1tKSsZCI9jOlc_epq4s6KrUxG6HC1D56DWu0F_5leb4cAEL0Z9_ho-R8BPhVj7L_C90pHQ6zXgik0XaqdrAJwcxuZCO5p8UuhvnzNOWmFsAoEMSQzsstZ7k28bBVyTPXl6A=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.

    Google Scholar

    [14] JIN J, WANG G H, LIU X B, et al. Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Bacterial Community in the Rhizosphere of Soybean Genotypes Grown in a Black Soil[J]. Pedosphere, 2009, 19(6):808-816.

    Google Scholar

    [15] MIETHLING R, WIELAND G, BACKHAUS H, et al. Variation of Microbial Rhizosphere Communities in Response to Crop Species, Soil Origin, and Inoculation with Sinorhizobium meliloti L33[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2000, 40(1):43-56.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社, 2000.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 王丽娟, 朱本国, 杨丽军, 等. 重庆主城不同功能区绿地土壤肥力综合评价[J]. 绿色科技, 2019(19):14-15.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 阚文杰, 吴启堂. 一个定量综合评价土壤肥力的方法初探[J]. 土壤通报, 1994, 25(6):245-247.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 何增耀, 叶兆杰, 吴方正.. 农业环境科学概论[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1991.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 全国土壤普查办公室. 中国土壤[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1998.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 高丽丽. 西藏土壤有机质和氮磷钾状况及其影响因素分析[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学, 2004.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 林栗漾, 鲜骏仁, 刘静静. 都市区土地整治初期对耕地土壤肥力的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, (2023-10-19)[2023-10-21] https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=KaAwsYWd1tIreYAzeUG3D1LQScaaXQhBA7aaM-CioUgBrk7FpWtYS3crWK643Brfu-_genlLVZiWzgOtoY3DxDGiZG794FgRIWsPHkBSDQ_D2YPWzCp7h4RV0QCU207nYIsMiR7Gkak=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 姚银根. 不同施肥模式对青浦行道树土壤理化性质和微生物的影响[J]. 植物学研究, 2022(4):535-540.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 闫冰, 陆晴, 夏嵩, 等. 城市土壤微生物多样性研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(8):191-204.

    Google Scholar

    [26] 薛立, 陈红跃, 徐英宝, 等. 混交林地土壤物理性质与微生物数量及酶活性的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2004, 35(2):154-158.

    Google Scholar

    [27] CHEN G, ZHU H L, ZHANG Y. Soil Microbial Activities and Carbon and Nitrogen Fixation[J]. Research in Microbiology, 2003, 154(6):393-398.

    Google Scholar

    [28] LAUBER C L, HAMADY M, KNIGHT R, et al. Pyrosequencing-Based Assessment of Soil pH as a Predictor of Soil Bacterial Community Structure at the Continental Scale[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(15):5111-5120.

    Google Scholar

    [29] XU H J, LI S, SU J Q, et al. Does Urbanization Shape Bacterial Community Composition in Urban Park Soils? A Case Study in 16 Representative Chinese Cities Based on the Pyrosequencing Method[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2014, 87(1):182-192.

    Google Scholar

    [30] KNOPS J M H, BRADLEY K L, WEDIN D A. Mechanisms of Plant Species Impacts on Ecosystem Nitrogen Cycling[J]. Ecology Letters, 2002, 5(3):454-466.

    Google Scholar

    [31] 柳添译. 土壤有机质和氮磷钾肥对土壤碳氮组分及氮肥利用率的影响[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2022.

    Google Scholar

    [32] 熊增海, 刘丽, 刘兵, 等. 硫酸钾对辣椒的抗病增产效应研究[J]. 青海农林科技, 2011(3):4-6.

    Google Scholar

    [33] HUANG C M, CHEN W C, LIN S H, et al. Exploration of Root-Associated Bacteria from the Medicinal Plant Platycodon grandiflorum[J]. Microbes and Environments, 2019, 34(4):413-420.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 王清奎, 田鹏, 孙兆林, 等. 森林土壤有机质研究的现状与挑战[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(11):3829-3843.

    Google Scholar

    [35] 曾曙才, 崔大方, 荣波, 等. 深圳笔架山公园土壤性状分析[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 44(S1):1-6.

    Google Scholar

    [36] 李政. 论土壤有机质的含量对土壤的影响[J]. 农民致富之友, 2016(2):73.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(624) PDF downloads(344) Cited by(0)

Access History

Study on Rhizosphere Soil Microorganism and Soil Fertility of Cinnamomum camphora (Linn) Presl Trees planted in Different Times and Places

Abstract: Taking Cinnamomum camphora (Linn) Presl planted at different times and locations in Jiulongpo District and Jinyun Mountain of Chongqing as the test objects, the differences on the quantity of rhizosphere soil microbes and soil chemical properties of C. camphora (Linn) Presl were analyzed by coating plate and soil chemical properties determination, and the comprehensive soil fertility was evaluated. The results showed that the number of bacteria in the rhizosphere soil microorganisms of C. camphora was the highest, and the number of bacteria and actinomycetes decreased with the increase of cultivation years. The soil of C. camphora street trees in Jiulongpo District of Chongqing is alkaline, with pH of 8.11~8.13, and low organic matter content. The rhizosphere soil of C. camphora in Jinyun Mountain is alkaline, with pH ranging from 5.2 to 6.46, among which the content of organic matter in Jinyun Mountain-20 was the highest. The analysis of various indicators showed that the soil fertility and fertility of C. camphora (Linn) Presl tree soil in Jiulongpo District and Jinyun Mountain of Chongqing were at a general level. The soil fertility of street trees in Jiulongpo District was lower than that in Jinyun Mountain. The results of this study provide a scientific basis for the cultivation and conservation of street trees in urban areas by comparing the soil environment of C. camphora (Linn) Presl in different locations.

Reference (36)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return