Search Advanced

Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

Article Contents
Previous Article Next Article

YANG Mei, ZHANG Wei. Towards Unfettered Growth and the Pursuit of Freedom:Rethinking of Kant’s Dualistic Educational Philosophy[J]. Journal of Teacher Education.
Citation: YANG Mei, ZHANG Wei. Towards Unfettered Growth and the Pursuit of Freedom:Rethinking of Kant’s Dualistic Educational Philosophy[J]. Journal of Teacher Education.
shu

Towards Unfettered Growth and the Pursuit of Freedom:Rethinking of Kant’s Dualistic Educational Philosophy

  • Faculty of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

More Information

  • MSC: G40-02

  • Kant's fundamental insights into education holds profound implications for the discipline of education. The basic tenet of Kant's educational philosophy is its dual nature,encompassing both the duality of human beings and that of education itself.The key to understanding this duality is found in the concepts of nature and freedom.Examining Kant's anthropological portrayal of humans in his philosophy reveals that the duality of humanity,in Kant's eyes,does not signify a dual coexistence of nature and freedom in individuals. Instead,it denotes a transformation of individuals from natural beings to liberal beings. Based on the examination of the design of educational methods and content in Kant's On Education,it becomes apparent that the dual nature of education is grounded in the transformation of individuals from natural beings to liberal beings,and manifested as dichotomy in form and a continuity in content. The composition and development of embryo and anlagen are the basis of dualistic education,which means that the educational objectives of dualistic education are similarly dual in nature.The educational objective rooted in nature is the pursuit of free growth in individuals,while the practical objective is the attainment of human freedom. Kant intricately weaves together various aspects of human developmental potential through the thread of transformation from natural beings to liberal beings. However,he cannot transcend the static dual existence of natural and liberal beings,leading to an inherent contradiction within Kant's dualistic educational thought.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 王坤庆.论康德对教育学的贡献[J].教育研究与实验,2001(4):12-17.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 赫费.康德:生平、著作与影响[M].郑伊倩,译.北京:人民出版社,2007:157.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 肖朗.人的两重性和教育的两重性——康德教育哲学思想探析[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2003(1):117-125.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 金生鈜.人是道德教化的终极目的——康德道德教育思想的当代价值[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2003(6):3-7,19.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 王啸.自由与自律:康德道德教育思想研究[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2008(1):33-41.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 林凌.理性与启蒙:论康德的教育思想体系建构[J].基础教育,2015(1):5-10,20.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 李其龙.康德教育思想之研究[J].中国教育科学,2017(1):47-75,46,236-237.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 周丽华.用强制培养出自由:康德的教育观[J].教育研究与实验,2017(4):24-29.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 李长伟.康德的实践性教育:强制与自由的悖论[J].教育学报,2019(4):10-25.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 林凌,彭韬.试论康德的教育学立场[J].中国教育科学,2019(1):15-28,136-137.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 徐洁.激活人的“善之禀赋”:康德论人性与道德教育[J].教育研究与实验,2020(4):28-32.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 袁辉.无用论抑或决定论——康德道德教育理论中的个人教育与社会启蒙教育[J].教育研究,2020(9):45-55.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 袁辉.康德双重目的论视角下的生命概念[J].自然辩证法研究,2020(7):84-89.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 鲍永玲.强制的艺术——再论康德的启蒙观[J].学术界,2021(12):37-44.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 詹世友.为了人性及其发展——康德少儿教育思想的宗旨[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020(1):32-40.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 瞿葆奎,郑金洲.教育学逻辑起点:昨天的观点与今天的认识(一)[J].上海教育科研,1998(3):2-9.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 康德.康德书信百封[M].李秋零,编译.上海:上海人民出版社,1992:244.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 康德.康德著作全集:典藏本:第3卷[M].李秋零,主编.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013:26.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 康德.康德著作全集:典藏本:第4卷[M].李秋零,主编.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 康德.康德著作全集:典藏本:第6卷[M].李秋零,主编.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 康德.康德著作全集:典藏本:第9卷[M].李秋零,主编.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 康德.康德著作全集:典藏本:第7卷[M].李秋零,主编.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 莱因哈特·布兰特.康德:还剩下什么?[M].张柯,译.北京:商务印书馆,2019:211.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 康德.康德著作全集:典藏本:第2卷[M].李秋零,主编.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013.446

    Google Scholar

    [25] 阿伦特.康德政治哲学讲稿[M].曹明,苏婉儿,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2013:43-44.

    Google Scholar

    [26] 龚群.康德伦理学中的道德法则与自然法则[J].学术月刊,2021(8):23-30.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(994) PDF downloads(171) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Towards Unfettered Growth and the Pursuit of Freedom:Rethinking of Kant’s Dualistic Educational Philosophy

Abstract: Kant's fundamental insights into education holds profound implications for the discipline of education. The basic tenet of Kant's educational philosophy is its dual nature,encompassing both the duality of human beings and that of education itself.The key to understanding this duality is found in the concepts of nature and freedom.Examining Kant's anthropological portrayal of humans in his philosophy reveals that the duality of humanity,in Kant's eyes,does not signify a dual coexistence of nature and freedom in individuals. Instead,it denotes a transformation of individuals from natural beings to liberal beings. Based on the examination of the design of educational methods and content in Kant's On Education,it becomes apparent that the dual nature of education is grounded in the transformation of individuals from natural beings to liberal beings,and manifested as dichotomy in form and a continuity in content. The composition and development of embryo and anlagen are the basis of dualistic education,which means that the educational objectives of dualistic education are similarly dual in nature.The educational objective rooted in nature is the pursuit of free growth in individuals,while the practical objective is the attainment of human freedom. Kant intricately weaves together various aspects of human developmental potential through the thread of transformation from natural beings to liberal beings. However,he cannot transcend the static dual existence of natural and liberal beings,leading to an inherent contradiction within Kant's dualistic educational thought.

    HTML

Reference (26)

Catalog

    Website Copyright © Journal of Teacher Education

    Address：Journal Press of Southwest University, Beibei District, Chongqing Tel：023-68254478, 68254572 E-mail：jsjyxb2@swu.edu.cn

    Supported by:Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return