Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

Article Contents

HOU Huaiyin, YUAN Zuoye. Research on the Construction of Discipline System,Academic System and Discourse System of Teacher Education in China[J]. Journal of Teacher Education.
Citation: HOU Huaiyin, YUAN Zuoye. Research on the Construction of Discipline System,Academic System and Discourse System of Teacher Education in China[J]. Journal of Teacher Education.

Research on the Construction of Discipline System,Academic System and Discourse System of Teacher Education in China

More Information
  • MSC: G650

  • The discipline system,academic system and discourse system of teacher education are not only the organic composition of teacher education,but also the existence of mutual generation and complement each other. Strengthening the construction of “three systems” is an important measure to promote the high-quality development of teacher education. At present,the construction of the discipline system of teacher education in China has changed from single structure to stereoscopic structure,the construction of the academic system of teacher education has changed from tracing the academic source to the pluralistic order,and the construction of the discourse system of teacher education has changed from the discourse transformstion to the discourse consciousness. While making certain progress in the construction of the discipline system,academic system and discourse system,there are also urgent problems in the following three aspects: the construction stance needs to be firmer,the goal of construction needs to be clearer,the level of construction needs to be further improved. Based on the above problems,the construction of the discipline system,academic system and discourse system of teacher education in China should be carried out from four aspects: Strengthening the top-level design and promote the construction of the “three systems” of teacher education. Expanding the discipline system of teacher education based on the discipline characteristics. Adhereing to the solid foundation and breaking new ground to improve the academic system of teacher education. Rooting in Chinese practice to innovate the discourse system of teacher education.

  • 加载中
  • [1] 习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗:在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M].北京:人民出版社,2022:43.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 侯怀银,李秧.教师教育学在中国:历程、进展和趋势[J].教师教育研究,2019(6):1-6,20.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 李立国,罗生全,陈亮,等.新时代学科高质量发展的多维向度与实践思考[J].中国电化教育,2022(6):1-14.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 肖昕.教师教育学建设的逻辑进向:学科体系、学术体系及话语体系的三维构建[J].黑龙江高教研究,2023(4):8-16.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 肖正德.系统论视域下教师教育学科体系之特质与构架[J].教育研究,2014(7):101-108.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 王健.我国教师教育学的逻辑起点研究及学科体系构建[D].上海:华东师范大学,2009:84.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 杨跃.关于教师教育学科构建的理性思考[J].教师教育研究,2007(1):1-5.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 艾兴,张玉.教师教育学科发展的现实基础与双重突围[J].教师教育学报,2021(1):15-21,66.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 李伟.教师教育学理论与知识体系研究[M].北京:中国国际广播出版社,2019:30-38.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 李中国,黎兴成.教师教育学科的建设逻辑[J].教育科学,2018(6):44-48.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 陶丽,付光槐.我国教师教育学科建设的现实困境与突破路径[J].中国成人教育,2023(8):3-7.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 王健.教师教育学科建设中的立场与视野[J].中国教育学刊,2011(7):52-55.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 龙宝新.教师教育学科:现象、隐忧与走向[J].教育研究,2021(7):60-70.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 袁振国.科学问题与教育学知识增长[J].教育研究,2019(4):4-14.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 刘方亮,师泽生.中国特色社会主义政治学学科体系、学术体系和话语体系何以构建[J].探索,2017(4):86-95.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 杨健民.理论自觉视域下中国哲学社会科学学术体系构建[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021(1):5-14.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 傅春晖,彭金定.话语权力关系的社会学诠释[J].求索,2007(5):79-80.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 徐勇,任路.构建中国特色政治学:学科、学术与话语——以政治学恢复重建历程为例[J].中国社会科学,2021(2):165-182,207 -208.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 叶澜,王枬.教师发展:在成己成人中创造教育新世界——专访华东师范大学叶澜教授[J].教师教育学报,2021(3):1-11.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 杨跃.“教师教育学科建设”的“去学科化”憧憬[J].中国教育学刊,2020(4):85-90.

    Google Scholar

    [21] HODGSON G M.Donald T.Campbell on the institutions of scientific knowledge and the limits to interdisciplinarity[J].Journal of Institutional Economics,2022,18(6):969-980.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 周彬.教师教育专业知识:生成、积累与课程转化[J].教育研究,2021(7):37-47.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 王健.教师教育的学科化建设及其思考[J].教师教育研究,2014(2):90-96.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 龙宝新.学科内卷化时代的教师教育学科建设[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2021(8):83-93.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 陈燮君.学科学导论:学科发展理论探索[M].上海:生活·读书·新知三联书店上海分店,1991:308-309.

    Google Scholar

    [26] 冯建军.构建教育学的中国话语体系[J].高等教育研究,2015(8):1-8.

    Google Scholar

    [27] 游旭群.构建高质量教师教育学科体系的意义、特征及路径[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022(6):5-13.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 托尼·比彻,保罗·特罗勒尔.学术部落及其领地:知识探索与学科文化[M].唐跃勤,蒲茂华,陈洪捷,译;陈洪捷,校.北京:北京大学出版社,2008:38-39.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 朱丽·汤普森·克莱恩.跨越边界——知识学科学科互涉[M].姜智芹,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2005:47-49.

    Google Scholar

    [30] 朱旭东,罗仁杰.论学科教师教育研究:价值、对象与路径[J].教师教育研究,2023(3):1-12.

    Google Scholar

    [31] 李旭,侯怀银.教育管理学的学科体系、学术体系和话语体系建设[J].教育学报,2022(4):59-70.

    Google Scholar

    [32] 侯怀银.中国教育学领域的“接着讲”[J].教育理论与实践,2009(34):8-11.

    Google Scholar

    [33] 叶澜.转化融通在合作研究中生成——四论教育理论与教育实践的关系[J].教育研究,2021(1):31-58.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 何明.“学科性学术”与“问题性学术”的张力及其消解——学术研究的建制化、去建制化与再建制化[J].开放时代,2022(1):41-48.

    Google Scholar

    [35] 岳伟.论教育科学研究的跨学科交叉融合[J].中国教育科学(中英文),2022(1):32-41.

    Google Scholar

    [36] 冯建军.中国特色社会主义教育学话语体系研究[J].社会科学战线,2023(5):235-248.

    Google Scholar

    [37] 联合国教科文组织.一起重新构想我们的未来:为教育打造新的社会契约[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2022:88-89.

    Google Scholar

    [38] 陈曙光.中国话语:说什么?怎么说?[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,2017:25.

    Google Scholar

    [39] 冯旭洋,朴雪涛.教育学中国话语体系中的概念及其建构[J].教育研究与实验,2023(2):16-24.

    Google Scholar

    [40] 文秋芳.论外在学术语言和内在学术语言——兼及中国特色学术话语体系构建[J].语言战略研究,2022(5):14-24.

    Google Scholar

    [41] 李猛,郑言.构建中国特色社会主义政治学学科体系、学术体系和话语体系何以必要[J].探索,2017(4):66-75.

    Google Scholar

    [42] 吴晓明.论当代中国学术话语体系的自主建构[J].中国社会科学,2011(2):5-13,4 ,202.

    Google Scholar

    [43] 侯怀银,原左晔.论教育学的普及[J].教育理论与实践,2021(31):3-9.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(1060) PDF downloads(97) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Research on the Construction of Discipline System,Academic System and Discourse System of Teacher Education in China

Abstract: 

The discipline system,academic system and discourse system of teacher education are not only the organic composition of teacher education,but also the existence of mutual generation and complement each other. Strengthening the construction of “three systems” is an important measure to promote the high-quality development of teacher education. At present,the construction of the discipline system of teacher education in China has changed from single structure to stereoscopic structure,the construction of the academic system of teacher education has changed from tracing the academic source to the pluralistic order,and the construction of the discourse system of teacher education has changed from the discourse transformstion to the discourse consciousness. While making certain progress in the construction of the discipline system,academic system and discourse system,there are also urgent problems in the following three aspects: the construction stance needs to be firmer,the goal of construction needs to be clearer,the level of construction needs to be further improved. Based on the above problems,the construction of the discipline system,academic system and discourse system of teacher education in China should be carried out from four aspects: Strengthening the top-level design and promote the construction of the “three systems” of teacher education. Expanding the discipline system of teacher education based on the discipline characteristics. Adhereing to the solid foundation and breaking new ground to improve the academic system of teacher education. Rooting in Chinese practice to innovate the discourse system of teacher education.

Reference (43)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return