高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

科学教师培养系统的设计及其实施路径——美国培养新一代科学教师的经验与启示

,  , 

上一篇

下一篇

薛松, 李佳涛, 崔鸿. 科学教师培养系统的设计及其实施路径——美国培养新一代科学教师的经验与启示[J]. 教师教育学报.
引用本文: 薛松, 李佳涛, 崔鸿. 科学教师培养系统的设计及其实施路径——美国培养新一代科学教师的经验与启示[J]. 教师教育学报.
shu
XUE Song, LI Jiatao, CUI Hong. Design and Implementation of Science Teacher Preparation System: Experience and Insights from Preparing a Next Generation of Science Teachers in the US[J]. Journal of Teacher Education.
Citation: XUE Song, LI Jiatao, CUI Hong. Design and Implementation of Science Teacher Preparation System: Experience and Insights from Preparing a Next Generation of Science Teachers in the US[J]. Journal of Teacher Education.
shu

科学教师培养系统的设计及其实施路径——美国培养新一代科学教师的经验与启示

  • 1. 淮阴师范学院 生命科学学院, 江苏 淮安 223300;

  • 2. 华中师范大学 生命科学学院, 湖北 武汉 430079

详细信息
    作者简介:

    薛松,教育学博士,淮阴师范学院生命科学学院讲师;李佳涛,华中师范大学生命科学学院博士研究生。

  • 中图分类号: G659

Design and Implementation of Science Teacher Preparation System: Experience and Insights from Preparing a Next Generation of Science Teachers in the US

  • 1. School of Life Science, Huaiyin Normal University, Huaian 223300, China;

  • 2. School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

  • 摘要: 教师培养系统是建设高素质专业化创新型教师队伍的重要支撑。为培养新一代科学教师,美国颁布了《2020科学教师培养标准》,并结合教师认证标准、教学标准等进行了系统设计,建立了以“主体-环境”为架构、以“绩效-标准”为导向、聚焦教师核心素养发展的教师培养系统。美国科学教师培养系统的实施路径是:加强培养标准与科学教育框架的统一性,注重科学教学与文化的同步性和实践性,重视职前与职后培养的一体性,强化教师培养评价的精准性。深入分析美国科学教师培养系统的设计与实践,可以给我国科学教师培养带来如下启示:构建教师培养系统,为推进科学教师培养奠定基础;完善教师教育标准体系,为创设科学教师培养环境提供依据;凝练教师核心素养,为科学教师培养明确目标定位;创新教师教育评价体系,为实现科学教师专业持续发展提供保障。
    Abstract: Teacher preparation system is an important support for the construction of high-quality,professional and innovative teaching staff. In order to cultivate the next generation science teachers,America promulgated the 2020 NSTA/ASTE Standards for Science Teacher Preparation. Combined with teacher certification standards and teaching standards,a teacher preparation system with “Subject and Environment” as its framework is constructed,which is guided by “Performance and Standards” and focuses on the key competencies. The implementation path of the science teacher preparation system is to strengthen the unity of training standards and the frame work for science education,the cultural synchronization and practicality of science teaching,the coherence of pre-service and post-service preparation,and the precision of teacher education evaluation. An in-depth interpretation of design and implementation of the preparation system brings some insights to the preparation of science teachers in China. It is necessary to construct a teacher education system to lay a foundation of science teacher education,improve the education standard system to establish the environment of teacher preparation,generalize the key competencies of science teacher to make clear the target orientation for teacher education,and innovate teacher education evaluation to provide a solid guarantee for professional continuous development.
  • 加载中
  • [1] EVANS M.Teacher education around the world:changing policies and practices[J].British Journal of Educational Studies,2013,61(3):377-380.
    [2] 蒋喜锋,刘小强.美国INTASC/InTASC核心教学标准评析[J].比较教育研究,2019 (5):58-66.
    [3] Council of Chief State School Officers.InTASC model core teaching standards:a resource for state dialogue (April 2011) [EB/OL].(2013-04-11)[2022-12-19].https://ccsso.org/resource-library/intasc-model-core-teaching-standards.
    [4] Council of Chief State School Officers.InTASC model core teaching standards and learning progressions for teachers 1.0[EB/OL].(2013-04-11)[2022-12-19].https://ccsso.org/resource-library/intasc-model-core-teaching-standards-and-learning-progressions-teachers-10.
    [5] National Science Teacher Association,Association for Science Teacher Education.2020 NSTA/ASTE standards for science teacher preparation[EB/OL].(2019-01-07)[2022-12-12].https://theaste.org/2020-nsta-aste-standards-for-science-teacher-preparation/.
    [6] National Research Council.A framework for K-12 science education:practices,crosscutting concepts,and core ideas [M].Washington,DC:The National Academies Press,2012:255-257.
    [7] MORRELL P D,PARK R M A,PYLE E J,et al.Preparing teachers of science for 2020 and beyond:highlighting changes to the NSTA/ASTE standards for science teacher preparation [J].Journal of Science Teacher Education,2020,31(1):1-7.
    [8] Learning Policy Institute.Understanding teacher shortages:2018 update:a state-by-state analysis of the factors influencing teacher supply,demand,and equity [EB/OL].(2018-08-24)[2020-12-06].https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/understanding-teacher-shortages-interactive.
    [9] American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.Colleges of education:a national portrait [EB/OL].(2018-08-09)[2022-12-06].https://aacte.org/colleges-of-education-a-national-portrait/.
    [10] Center for American Progress.What to make of declining enrollment in teacher preparation programs [EB/OL].(2019-12-03)[2022-12-06].https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-k-12/reports/2019/12/03/477311/make-declining-enrollment-teacher-preparation-programs.
    [11] Learning Policy Institute.Teacher turnover:why it matters and what we can do about it [EB/OL].(2017-08-16)[2022-12-06].https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-turnover-report.
    [12] 范国睿.教育生态学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2000:26-31.
    [13] VALLI L,RENNERT-ARIEV P.New standards and assessments?Curriculum transformation in teacher education[J].Journal of Curriculum Studies,2002,34(2):201-225.
    [14] 王凯.专业品性:美国教师教育标准的新元素[J].教育研究与实验,2011(3):76-80.
    [15] 郭元祥.论学科育人的逻辑起点、内在条件与实践诉求[J].教育研究,2020 (4):4-15.
    [16] IRVINE J J.Educating teachers for diversity:seeing with a cultural eye [M].New York:Teachers College Press,2003:15-17.
    [17] LADSON-BILLINGS G.Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy [J].American Educational Research Journal,1995,32(3):465-491.
    [18] WHITAKER M C,VALTIERRA K M.The dispositions for culturally responsive pedagogy scale[J].Journal for Multicultural Education,2018,12(1):10-24.
    [19] National Research Council.Standards for K-12 engineering education?[M].Washington,DC:National Academies Press,2010:15-19.
    [20] 陈时见,王雪.教师教育一体化课程体系的构建与实施[J].教育研究,2015(8):109-112.
    [21] VEAL W R,ALLAN E.Understanding the 2012 NSTA science standards for teacher preparation [J].Journal of Science Teacher Education,2014,25(5):567-580.
    [22] 黄健毅,廖伯琴.我国2016—2020年义务教育科学教师缺口量预测[J].教师教育研究,2015(4):27-30.
    [23] 左成光.2018-2030年我国小学科学教师需求预测及对策研究[J].教师教育学报,2019 (6):78-85.
    [24] 教育部办公厅关于加强小学科学教师培养的通知[EB/OL].(2022-05-19)[2022-12-06].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-05/28/content_5692779.htm.
    [25] 张一鸣,王健,白欣,等.美国NSTA科学教师培养标准变革及启示[J].课程·教材·教法,2021(12):130-136.
    [26] 洪明.教师教育专业化路径与选择性路径的对峙与融合——NCATE与TEAC教师培养标准与认证的比较研究[J].全球教育展望,2010(7):48-53.
    [27] 胡惠闵,崔允漷.《教师教育课程标准》研制历程与问题回应[J].全球教育展望,2012(6):10-21.
    [28] 苗学杰,秦妍.欧盟教师核心素养框架及其培育路径探析[J].外国教育研究,2020(7):18-30.
    [29] 王光明,张楠,李健,等.教师核心素养和能力的结构体系及发展建议[J].中国教育学刊,2019(3):81-88.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1533
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1533
  • PDF下载数:  290
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程

科学教师培养系统的设计及其实施路径——美国培养新一代科学教师的经验与启示

    作者简介: 薛松,教育学博士,淮阴师范学院生命科学学院讲师;李佳涛,华中师范大学生命科学学院博士研究生。
  • 1. 淮阴师范学院 生命科学学院, 江苏 淮安 223300;
  • 2. 华中师范大学 生命科学学院, 湖北 武汉 430079
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-09-14
基金项目: 

摘要: 教师培养系统是建设高素质专业化创新型教师队伍的重要支撑。为培养新一代科学教师,美国颁布了《2020科学教师培养标准》,并结合教师认证标准、教学标准等进行了系统设计,建立了以“主体-环境”为架构、以“绩效-标准”为导向、聚焦教师核心素养发展的教师培养系统。美国科学教师培养系统的实施路径是:加强培养标准与科学教育框架的统一性,注重科学教学与文化的同步性和实践性,重视职前与职后培养的一体性,强化教师培养评价的精准性。深入分析美国科学教师培养系统的设计与实践,可以给我国科学教师培养带来如下启示:构建教师培养系统,为推进科学教师培养奠定基础;完善教师教育标准体系,为创设科学教师培养环境提供依据;凝练教师核心素养,为科学教师培养明确目标定位;创新教师教育评价体系,为实现科学教师专业持续发展提供保障。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (29)

目录

网站版权所有 © 《教师教育学报》编辑部

地址：重庆市北碚区西南大学期刊社 电话：023-68254478, 68254572 电子邮箱：jsjyxb2@swu.edu.cn

本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司开发

/

返回文章
返回