Effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Tobacco Bacterial Wilt in Qianjiang
-
摘要: 为探究不同浓度荧光假单胞菌与有机肥复配施用对烟草青枯病的影响,明确能充分发挥和保障微生物防控烟草青枯病效果的最佳施用浓度,提高防治效率和效果,本研究通过室内盆栽试验和黔江基地单元小区试验,以根茎康微生物菌剂作为阳性对照,探究移栽时窝施不同浓度荧光假单胞菌与动物源有机肥牛粪对不同时期烟草农艺性状的影响及青枯病的防控效果.结果表明,在团棵期和旺长期,田间试验各处理之间烟草农艺性状指标差异无统计学意义,表明移栽时窝施微生物菌肥对烟株的生长发育无明显影响.从控病效果来看,微生物菌肥对烟草青枯病具有一定的控病效果,其中低浓度微生物菌肥对烟草青枯病的防治效果优于高浓度,浓度为1×107cfu/g的生物菌肥在室内和田间对烟草青枯病的相对防效分别达58.56%和55.21%.室内盆栽试验和田间试验的结果趋于一致.研究结果对烟草土传病害生物防治提供参考意义.Abstract: In order to explore the effects of different concentrations of Pseudomonas fluorescens combined with organic fertilizer on tobacco bacterial wilt, determine the optimal concentration to guarantee the microbial control effect on tobacco bacterial wilt, and improve the control efficiency, in this study, the effects of different concentrations of Pseudomonas fluorescens and animal manure on agronomic traits of tobacco in different periods of growth, and the prevention and control effects on bacterial wilt were investigated by pot experiment and unit plot experiment in Qianjiang District, with Genjingkang microbial agent as positive control. The results showed that there was no significant difference in performance of agronomic traits between different treatments in the lumps and flourishing stages, indicating that nest application of microbial fertilizer had no significant effect on the growth and development of tobacco plants. In terms of effectof disease control, microbial fertilizer had certain effect ondisease control of tobacco bacterial wilt, andthe relative control efficiency of 107 cfu/g microbial fertilizer against tobacco bacterial wilt was 58.56% and 55.21% in greenhouse and field experiment, respectively. The results of indoor pot experiment and field experiment were similar. The results provided reference for biological control of soil-borne tobacco diseases.
-
Key words:
- tobacco bacterial wilt /
- Pseudomonas fluorescens /
- biological control .
-
-
[1] 霍沁建,张深,王若焱.烟草青枯病研究进展[J].中国农学通报, 2007, 23(8):364-368. [2] 孔凡玉.烟草青枯病的综合防治[J].烟草科技, 2003, 36(4):42-43, 48. [3] 赵冏炅,曾德武,彭孟祥,等.烟草青枯病防治研究进展[J].湖南农业科学, 2021(5):108-110, 114. [4] 陈程,黎定军,陈武.烟草青枯病生物防治研究进展[J].作物研究, 2011, 25(6):639-642. [5] 陈雪,代园风,余祥文,等.烟草青枯病生物防治研究进展[J].农业灾害研究, 2016, 6(5):10-12. [6] 段燕平,杨金广,杨继洪,等.抗烟草青枯病菌的枯草芽孢杆菌SH7的筛选与鉴定[J].吉林农业大学学报, 2012, 34(1):52-57. [7] 陆铮铮,彭丽娟,丁海霞,等.烟草青枯菌拮抗放线菌的筛选及鉴定[J].中国烟草科学, 2013, 34(2):54-58. [8] 张伏军.烟草青枯菌拮抗细菌swu31-2的分离及其生物防治效果的研究[D].重庆:西南大学, 2008. [9] 胡军华,张伏军,蓝希钳,等.烟草根际细菌铜绿假单胞菌swu31-2的定殖能力及其对烟草青枯病的防治作用[J].植物保护, 2009, 35(5):89-94. [10] HASSEN W, NEIFAR M, CHERIF H, et al. Pseudomonas rhizophila S211, a New Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterium with Potential in Pesticide-Bioremediation[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9:34. [11] 张伟琼,聂明,肖明.荧光假单胞菌生防机理的研究进展[J].生物学杂志, 2007, 24(3):9-11, 24. [12] 李,刘娜,郑丽博.荧光假单胞菌植物病害防治及研究进展[J].分子植物育种, 2018, 16(11):3693-3697. [13] 杨海君,谭周进,肖启明,等.假单胞菌的生物防治作用研究[J].中国生态农业学报, 2004, 12(3):158-161. [14] 吴琼,王东凯,王雷,等.荧光假单胞菌抗生性代谢产物的研究进展[J].黑龙江科学, 2017, 8(2):58-59. [15] 金颖,胡洪波,张雪洪,等.假单胞菌产生的抗生素研究[J].上海农业学报, 2005, 21(3):106-109. [16] 杨毅,李治,高玲霞,等.荧光假单胞菌抗生性代谢产物合成相关基因的研究现状[J].中国生物工程杂志, 2012, 32(8):100-106. [17] 董国菊.荧光假单胞菌Pseudomonas fluorescens P-72-10菌株对烟草黑胫病的生防机理研究[D].重庆:西南大学, 2012. [18] 李红丽,郭夏丽,李清飞,等.抑制烟草青枯病生物有机肥的研制及其生防效果研究[J].土壤学报, 2010, 47(4):798-801. [19] 娄海博,王晓冰,陈俊,等.拮抗青枯劳尔氏菌的荧光假单胞菌SN15-2分离鉴定及其生防能力分析[J].中国植保导刊, 2019, 39(3):12-18. [20] 娄海博.荧光假单胞菌SN15-2抑制青枯劳尔氏菌的分子基础[D].上海:华东理工大学, 2018. [21] 王艳辉,陈小燕,肖艳.荧光假单胞菌对辣椒青枯病防效田间试验初报[J].西北园艺(蔬菜), 2013(4):52-53. [22] 柳辉林,张剑,徐隆根,等.荧光假单胞菌3000亿个/克粉剂防治烟草青枯病田间药效试验[J].农药科学与管理, 2008, 29(6):24-26. -
计量
- 文章访问数: 275
- HTML全文浏览数: 250
- PDF下载数: 79
- 施引文献: 0
下载: