几种生防菌剂对“云烟87”抗病性及农艺性状的影响

李凤巍; 江龙; 胡丽涛; 王智; 陈海涛; 马啸; 朱晓伟; 王晶; 孙现超

doi:10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.06.007

植物医学

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
	姓名不能为空！
邮箱
	邮箱不能为空！非法的邮箱地址。
手机号码
	电话不能为空！请输入有效手机号!
标题
	标题不能为空！
留言内容
	内容不能为空！
验证码
	验证码不能为空！验证码错误！

几种生防菌剂对“云烟87”抗病性及农艺性状的影响

, , , , , , , ,

李凤巍, 江龙, 胡丽涛, 等. 几种生防菌剂对“云烟87”抗病性及农艺性状的影响[J]. 植物医学, 2022, (6): 60-70. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.06.007

引用本文:

李凤巍, 江龙, 胡丽涛, 等. 几种生防菌剂对“云烟87”抗病性及农艺性状的影响[J]. 植物医学, 2022, (6): 60-70. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.06.007

LI Fengwei, JIANG Long, HU Litao, et al. Effects of Several Biocontrol Agents on Disease Resistance and Agronomic Characters of 'Yunyan 87'[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (6): 60-70. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.06.007

Citation:

LI Fengwei, JIANG Long, HU Litao, et al. Effects of Several Biocontrol Agents on Disease Resistance and Agronomic Characters of 'Yunyan 87'[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (6): 60-70. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.06.007

几种生防菌剂对“云烟87”抗病性及农艺性状的影响

1. 西南大学植物保护学院, 重庆 400715;

2. 中国烟草总公司重庆市公司丰都分公司, 重庆丰都 408200;

3. 中国烟草总公司重庆市公司石柱分公司, 重庆石柱 409100;

4. 重庆烟草科学研究所, 重庆 400715;

5. 中国烟草总公司重庆市公司, 重庆 400023

详细信息

作者简介:
李凤巍,硕士研究生,主要从事植物病毒学及植物病害控制研究. .

中图分类号: S572

Effects of Several Biocontrol Agents on Disease Resistance and Agronomic Characters of 'Yunyan 87'

1. College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China;

2. Chongqing Fengdu Branch, China National Tobacco Corporation, Fengdu Chongqing 408200, China;

3. Chongqing Shizhu Branch, China National Tobacco Corporation, Shizhu Chongqing 409100, China;

4. Chongqing Tobacco Research Institute, Chongqing 400715, China;

5. Chongqing Company of China Tobacco Corporation, Chongqing 400023, China

摘要: 为明确生防菌剂对常见烟草病害的影响,本研究选取了5种常见生防菌剂分析其对烟草病害及农艺性状的影响,结果显示枯草芽孢杆菌和侧孢苏云金复合菌对烟草病毒病、烟草野火病和烟草赤星病有较好防效.进一步对比2种生防菌剂灌根和叶面喷施不同时期、不同施用方法对烟草病害发生以及农艺性状的影响,发现枯草芽孢杆菌最佳施用时期以及最佳施用方式分别为旺长中期和叶面喷施处理;侧孢苏云金复合菌最佳施用时期以及最佳施用方式为旺长中期和灌根处理,在该时期二者能显著降低烟草病害的发生,并提高烟草农艺性状,该研究为生防菌防治烟草病害并提高烟草农艺性状提供了理论基础.
- 生防菌剂 /
- 烟草 /
- 田间防效 /
- 农艺性状
Abstract: In order to clarify the effects of biocontrol agents on common tobacco diseases, five biocontrol agents were selected in this study, and their effects on tobacco diseases and agronomic characters were analyzed. It was found that Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus thuringiensis had good control effects on tobacco virus disease, tobacco wildfire disease and tobacco brown spot disease. The effects of the two biocontrol agents on the occurrence of tobacco diseases and agronomic traits were further compared between root irrigation and foliar spraying in different periods and with different application methods. It was found that the best application period and the best application method for control of Bacillus subtilis were the middle growth stage and foliar spraying treatment, respectively. The best application time and the best application method for control of Bacillus thuringiensis were the middle growth stage and root irrigation treatment, respectively, which could significantly reduce the occurrence of tobacco diseases and improve the agronomic characteristics of tobacco. This study provides a theoretical basis for tobacco disease control and improvement of tobacco agronomic characters.
- bio-control bacteria agent /
- tobacco /
- the field control effect /
- agronomic characters .

[1]	陈瑞泰, 朱贤朝, 王智发, 等. 全国16个主产烟省(区)烟草侵染性病害调研报告[J]. 中国烟草科学, 1997, 18(4):1-7.
[2]	陈海涛. 重庆市烟区主要烟草病害及综防技术[J]. 植物医生, 2007, 20(5):28-29.
[3]	王琳. 植物病害综合防治技术[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2017, 33(3):225-226.
[4]	卜元卿, 孔源, 智勇, 等. 化学农药对环境的污染及其防控对策建议[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2014, 16(2):19-25.
[5]	张杰, 董莎萌, 王伟, 等. 植物免疫研究与抗病虫绿色防控:进展、机遇与挑战[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2019, 49(11):1479-1507.
[6]	彭迎春, 吴文信, 李思军, 等. 桂阳县烟草病虫害绿色防控工作现状及建议[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(24):88-89, 92.
[7]	贺海滨. 烟草病虫害发生规律与绿色防控措施[J]. 世界热带农业信息, 2022(1):35-36.
[8]	邱德文. 我国植物病害生物防治的现状及发展策略[J]. 植物保护, 2010, 36(4):15-18, 35.
[9]	张俊华. 微生物代谢产物作用于植物的研究探讨[J]. 生命科学研究, 2007, 11(S1):44-47.
[10]	陈志谊. 芽孢杆菌类生物杀菌剂的研发与应用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2015, 31(5):723-732.
[11]	朱玥妍, 刘姣, 杜春梅. 芽孢杆菌生物防治植物病害研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(34):16635-16638.
[12]	何亚登. 2种生防菌的发酵、土壤定殖及防治烟草土传病害的研究[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2019.
[13]	韩长志. 植物病害生防菌的研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2015, 34(1):33-37, 25.
[14]	赵荣艳, 杨靖华, 蒋士君. 烟草病害生物防治研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 34(22):5918-5919, 5968.
[15]	HARMAN G E. Overview of Mechanisms and Uses of TrichodermaSpp[J]. Phytopathology, 2006, 96(2):190-194.
[16]	陈志谊. 芽孢杆菌类生物杀菌剂的研发与应用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2015, 31(5):723-732.
[17]	孙广正, 姚拓, 赵桂琴, 等. 荧光假单胞菌防治植物病害研究现状与展望[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(4):174-190.
[18]	王星云, 宋卡魏, 张荣意. 枯草芽孢杆菌菌剂的开发应用[J]. 广西热带农业, 2007(2):32-35.
[19]	李锡宏, 余君, 陈守文, 等. 防治烟草赤星病的生防菌剂田间对比试验[J]. 湖北植保, 2018(2):7-8.
[20]	LVX, YUANM T, PEIY H, etal. The Enhancement of Antiviral Activity of Chloroinconazide by Aglinate-Based Nanogel and Its Plant Growth Promotion Effect[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2021, 69(17):4992-5002.
[21]	李俊喜, 刘润进. 菌根真菌菌剂防治作物土传病害潜力分析[J]. 植物病理学报, 2007, 37(1):1-8.
[22]	吴剑, 何军, 李祥军, 等. 诱导抗病剂与生防制剂在烟草上的防效研究[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2015, 37(6):7-10, 17.
[23]	孙宏伟, 元野, 杨晓敏, 等. 烟草野火病拮抗生防菌的筛选、鉴定与应用[J]. 烟草科技, 2012, 45(8):84-88.
[24]	王炳豪. 不同时期施药对烟草青枯病防治效果研究[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2009(3):51-52.
[25]	刘畅, 姚晨虓, 李小杰, 等. 复合生防菌剂对田间烟草根茎类病害的防治效果[J]. 烟草科技, 2021, 54(11):18-24.
[26]	方明, 殷全玉, 吴文信, 等. 高碳基肥料配施微生物菌剂对烟叶综合性状的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(12):12-14, 18.

计量

文章访问数: 604
HTML全文浏览数: 582
PDF下载数: 358
施引文献: 0

几种生防菌剂对“云烟87”抗病性及农艺性状的影响

作者简介: 李凤巍,硕士研究生,主要从事植物病毒学及植物病害控制研究.
1. 西南大学植物保护学院, 重庆 400715;

2. 中国烟草总公司重庆市公司丰都分公司, 重庆丰都 408200;

3. 中国烟草总公司重庆市公司石柱分公司, 重庆石柱 409100;

4. 重庆烟草科学研究所, 重庆 400715;

5. 中国烟草总公司重庆市公司, 重庆 400023

收稿日期: 2022-10-28

基金项目:

关键词:

摘要: 为明确生防菌剂对常见烟草病害的影响,本研究选取了5种常见生防菌剂分析其对烟草病害及农艺性状的影响,结果显示枯草芽孢杆菌和侧孢苏云金复合菌对烟草病毒病、烟草野火病和烟草赤星病有较好防效.进一步对比2种生防菌剂灌根和叶面喷施不同时期、不同施用方法对烟草病害发生以及农艺性状的影响,发现枯草芽孢杆菌最佳施用时期以及最佳施用方式分别为旺长中期和叶面喷施处理;侧孢苏云金复合菌最佳施用时期以及最佳施用方式为旺长中期和灌根处理,在该时期二者能显著降低烟草病害的发生,并提高烟草农艺性状,该研究为生防菌防治烟草病害并提高烟草农艺性状提供了理论基础.

English Abstract

Effects of Several Biocontrol Agents on Disease Resistance and Agronomic Characters of 'Yunyan 87'

¹,
¹,
²,
³,
⁴,
²,
⁵,
⁵,
¹

1. 西南大学植物保护学院, 重庆 400715;
2. 中国烟草总公司重庆市公司丰都分公司, 重庆丰都 408200;
3. 中国烟草总公司重庆市公司石柱分公司, 重庆石柱 409100;
4. 重庆烟草科学研究所, 重庆 400715;
5. 中国烟草总公司重庆市公司, 重庆 400023

Received Date: 2022-10-28

Keywords:

Abstract: In order to clarify the effects of biocontrol agents on common tobacco diseases, five biocontrol agents were selected in this study, and their effects on tobacco diseases and agronomic characters were analyzed. It was found that Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus thuringiensis had good control effects on tobacco virus disease, tobacco wildfire disease and tobacco brown spot disease. The effects of the two biocontrol agents on the occurrence of tobacco diseases and agronomic traits were further compared between root irrigation and foliar spraying in different periods and with different application methods. It was found that the best application period and the best application method for control of Bacillus subtilis were the middle growth stage and foliar spraying treatment, respectively. The best application time and the best application method for control of Bacillus thuringiensis were the middle growth stage and root irrigation treatment, respectively, which could significantly reduce the occurrence of tobacco diseases and improve the agronomic characteristics of tobacco. This study provides a theoretical basis for tobacco disease control and improvement of tobacco agronomic characters.