Search Advanced

Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2018 Volume 5 Issue 5
Article Contents
Previous Article Next Article

ZHANG Haisheng. Connotation and Contradictions of Chinese Higher Education Modernization[J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 2018, 5(5): 65-73. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.jsjy.2018.05.010
Citation: ZHANG Haisheng. Connotation and Contradictions of Chinese Higher Education Modernization[J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 2018, 5(5): 65-73. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.jsjy.2018.05.010
shu

Connotation and Contradictions of Chinese Higher Education Modernization

  • Editorial Department, Chongqing university of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing 402160, China

More Information
  • Received Date: 05/07/2018
  • From the perspectives of the functions, structure, system, goals in higher education and the functions of colleges and universities to analyses the connotation of Chinese higher education modernization. We find that it's not only care about people's free and comprehensive development, but also adapt to and lead the development of society; realize the modernization of talent cultivation, develop science, social service, and cultural heritage; it is fully developed education and balanced development education. It embodies the dynamic checks and balances of work, beliefs and power. From the perspective of time and space, the modernization of higher education is not only a time-honored relationship, but also a spatially balanced relationship, as well as technical interaction. From the perspective of construction standards, higher education modernization has both universal and international standards. There are national characteristics of the nation; in terms of construction goals, the modernization of higher education is both a strategic move of the country and a vision for the development of education. Therefore, in the process of advancing the modernization of China's higher education, we must comprehensively review and strive to eliminate the following seven major contradictions between international standards and Chinese characteristics, connotative development and extensional development, priority building and balanced development, administrative and academic power, basic education and higher education, software leadership and hardware support, modern technology and traditional teaching. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively examine these seven contradictions and work hard to find a solution. That is to say, we must conscientiously study and understand the spirit of the National Education Conference held on September 10, 2018, seize the main contradictions, adhere to the direction of socialist education, and take the socialist builders and successors who cultivate the moral, intellectual, and artistic development as the fundamental task. Effectively take root in China's land-based education, take the road of higher education modernization with Chinese characteristics, and promote the harmonization of international standards and Chinese characteristics; adhere to the connotation-based development, through the reform of higher education system and mechanism, promote the rational distribution and full use of high-quality higher education resources; continue to promote the "double first-class" construction, achieve dynamic adjustment, and promote the full development and balanced development of higher education.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 瞿振元.实现高等教育现代化需要理论先行[J].中国高教研究,2013(12):3-5.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年)[EB/OL].(2010-07-29)[2018-04-06].http://old.moe.gov.cn//publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_838/201008/93704.html.

    Google Scholar

    [3] The Education 2030 Framework for Action[EB/OL].[2018-04-06]. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/ED/ED_new/pdf/FFA-ENG-27Oct15.pdf.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 2016年全国教育事业发展统计公报[EB/OL].[2018-04-06]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/201707/t20170710_309042.html.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 习近平.决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利[N].人民日报,2017-10-28(01).

    Google Scholar

    [6] 刘智运.对我国实现高等教育现代化的思考[J].中国高等教育,2010(10):28-30.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 李国仓.论中国高等教育现代化进程中的理论认识与实践选择[J].江苏大学学报(社会科学版),2015,17(3):56-60,72.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 眭依凡.高等教育现代化的理性思考[J].高等教育研究,2014,35(10):1-10.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 史静寰,叶之红,胡建华,等.走向2030:中国高等教育现代化建设之路[J].中国高教研究,2017(5):1-14.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 瞿振元.中国高等教育现代化的若干问题[J].中国高教研究,2017(7):1-5.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 张安富."十化"趋势:我国高等教育现代化发展的基本特征[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2010(12):53-57.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 陈廷柱,刘赛尔.面向2030的高等教育现代化:国家行动和高校发展——中国高等教育学会高等教育学专业委员会2017年学术年会综述[J].高等教育研究,2017,38(11):107-109.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 刘振天,杨雅文.现代化视野中高等教育国际化与民族化[J].教育发展研究,2003(2):48-51.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 伯顿·克拉克.高等教育系统——学术组织的跨国研究[M].王承绪,徐辉,殷企平,等译.杭州:杭州大学出版社,1999:6-12.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 袁利平.中国共产党教育现代化的理论演进与实践逻辑[J].重庆高教研究,2018,6(2):3-15.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 蔡宗模,毛亚庆.高等教育全球化:逻辑与内涵[J].高等教育研究,2013(7):10-17.

    Google Scholar

    [17] The Robbins Report (1963)[EB/OL].[2018-04-26].http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/robbins/robbins1963.html#06.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 刘岩.全民、终身、优质:欧洲高等教育现代化的三个面向[J].现代教育管理,2018(3):123-128.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 刘淑华.世纪初俄罗斯高等教育现代化的新进展[J].比较教育研究,2005(6):7-11.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 许美德,陈艳霞,王洪才.文明对话与世界一流大学建设[J].重庆高教研究,2018,6(5):3-19.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 李国强.传统文化视野中的高等教育现代化[J].理工高教研究,2009,28(2):32-35.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 卢勃.高等教育现代化与传统问题研究[J].教育与现代化,2006(2):8-12.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 王静修.高等教育"现代化"与"强国"辨析[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2018,31(2):108-112.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 陈恒敏.不丹教育现代化:发展策略及主要特点[J].比较教育研究,2018,40(1):13-23.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 蒋洪池.巴西高等教育现代化策略研究[J].复旦教育论坛,2006(1):79-84.

    Google Scholar

    [26] 刘振天,杨雅文.现代化视野中的高等教育国际化与民族化[J].江苏高教,2002(6):2-6.

    Google Scholar

    [27] 张德祥,林杰."高等教育内涵式发展"本质的历史变迁与当代意蕴[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2014(11):3-8.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 刘振天.内涵式发展:高等教育本质论、价值论与方法论重建[J].大学教育科学,2013(6):14-20.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 刘振天.从外延式发展到内涵式发展:转型时代中国高等教育价值革命[J].高等教育研究,2014,35(9):1-7.

    Google Scholar

    [30] 石健壮,沈曦,赵丽,等.以五大理念引领高等教育现代化[J].重庆高教研究,2016,4(3):118-127.

    Google Scholar

    [31] 刘益东.高等教育现代化中的"麦当劳化"及其消解[J].现代教育管理,2017(10):6-11.

    Google Scholar

    [32] 潘懋元,李国强.2030年中国高等教育现代化发展前瞻[J].中国高等教育,2016(17):5-7.

    Google Scholar

    [33] 王少媛.面向2030:高等教育体系现代化的内涵特征与建设策略[J].黑龙江高教研究,2017(11):19-23.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 张湘伟,何秀成.略论高等教育的大众化和现代化[J].广东社会科学,2007(1):45-50.

    Google Scholar

    [35] 胡炳仙.我国重点大学建设的渐进模式[J].高等教育研究,2017,38(5):26-31.

    Google Scholar

    [36] 李欣.从"普及中的失衡"到"均衡中的普及"——加拿大促进高等教育均衡发展的政策研究[J].复旦教育论坛,2013,11(1):75-79.

    Google Scholar

    [37] 陈廷柱,王建华,阎光才,等.面向2035的中国高等教育(笔会)[J].苏州大学学报(教育科学版),2018,6(1):1-22.

    Google Scholar

    [38] 安雪慧.教育发展的那些不平衡和不充分[N].光明日报,2018-01-23(13).

    Google Scholar

    [39] 范先佐,郭清扬.当前我国义务教育均衡发展改革的重点和难点[J].教师教育学报,2016,3(2):71-81.

    Google Scholar

    [40] 朱旭东,李育球.新时代教育强国的新内涵建构[J].重庆高教研究,2018,6(3):3-8.

    Google Scholar

    [41] 何传启.制度、质量、公平:实现高等教育现代化的突破口[J].中国高等教育,2014(7):8-10.

    Google Scholar

    [42] 张海生.大学职能异化问题及其对策研究[D].合肥:安徽大学硕士学位论文,2016:14.

    Google Scholar

    [43] 王炳照.书院精神的传承与创新[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2008(1):1-9.

    Google Scholar

    [44] 潘懋元,陈斌."互联网+教育"是高校教学改革的必然趋势[J].重庆高教研究,2017,5(1):3-8.

    Google Scholar

    [45] 新时代教育改革发展的行动指南[N].中国教育报,2018-09-12(02).

    Google Scholar

    [46] 白强.走向世界一流大学的改革逻辑与启示——以哈佛大学百年改革为例[J].教师教育学报,2017,4(1):112-118.

    Google Scholar

    [47] 王洪才.论中国文化与中国大学模式——对露丝·海霍"中国大学模式"命题的文化逻辑解析[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012,51(1):144-152.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(1174) PDF downloads(1) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Connotation and Contradictions of Chinese Higher Education Modernization

  • Received Date: 05/07/2018

Abstract: From the perspectives of the functions, structure, system, goals in higher education and the functions of colleges and universities to analyses the connotation of Chinese higher education modernization. We find that it's not only care about people's free and comprehensive development, but also adapt to and lead the development of society; realize the modernization of talent cultivation, develop science, social service, and cultural heritage; it is fully developed education and balanced development education. It embodies the dynamic checks and balances of work, beliefs and power. From the perspective of time and space, the modernization of higher education is not only a time-honored relationship, but also a spatially balanced relationship, as well as technical interaction. From the perspective of construction standards, higher education modernization has both universal and international standards. There are national characteristics of the nation; in terms of construction goals, the modernization of higher education is both a strategic move of the country and a vision for the development of education. Therefore, in the process of advancing the modernization of China's higher education, we must comprehensively review and strive to eliminate the following seven major contradictions between international standards and Chinese characteristics, connotative development and extensional development, priority building and balanced development, administrative and academic power, basic education and higher education, software leadership and hardware support, modern technology and traditional teaching. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively examine these seven contradictions and work hard to find a solution. That is to say, we must conscientiously study and understand the spirit of the National Education Conference held on September 10, 2018, seize the main contradictions, adhere to the direction of socialist education, and take the socialist builders and successors who cultivate the moral, intellectual, and artistic development as the fundamental task. Effectively take root in China's land-based education, take the road of higher education modernization with Chinese characteristics, and promote the harmonization of international standards and Chinese characteristics; adhere to the connotation-based development, through the reform of higher education system and mechanism, promote the rational distribution and full use of high-quality higher education resources; continue to promote the "double first-class" construction, achieve dynamic adjustment, and promote the full development and balanced development of higher education.

    HTML

Reference (47)

Catalog

    Website Copyright © Journal of Teacher Education

    Address：Journal Press of Southwest University, Beibei District, Chongqing Tel：023-68254478, 68253439 E-mail：jsjyxb2@swu.edu.cn

    Supported by:Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return