Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2026 Volume 48 Issue 7
Article Contents

Sun Haiyan, Chen Weiwei, Yuan Ting, et al. Effects of low-temperature storage conditions on aroma compounds of 'Da wuxing' loquat fruit based on Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis(PLS-DA)[J]. Journal of Southwest University Natural Science Edition, 2026, 48(7): 19-28. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2026.07.002
Citation: Sun Haiyan, Chen Weiwei, Yuan Ting, et al. Effects of low-temperature storage conditions on aroma compounds of 'Da wuxing' loquat fruit based on Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis(PLS-DA)[J]. Journal of Southwest University Natural Science Edition, 2026, 48(7): 19-28. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2026.07.002

Effects of low-temperature storage conditions on aroma compounds of 'Da wuxing' loquat fruit based on Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis(PLS-DA)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Liang Guolu
  • Received Date: 09/09/2025
    Available Online: 20/07/2026
  • MSC: S667.3

  • To investigate the effect of different storage temperatures on the postharvest quality of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl. cv. Dawuxing), red-fleshed 'Dawuxing' loquat was used as experimental material, and three low-temperature treatments were set up: 0 ℃, 8 ℃ and Low Temperature Conditioning (LTC). After 35 d of storage, fruit firmness and browning index were measured. Aroma volatiles of loquat were detected by Head Space Solid-Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Differential aroma compounds were analyzed, and fruit quality was comprehensively evaluated combined with Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA). The results showed no significant differences in fruit firmness among the three treatments before 21 d of storage. However, at 28 d and 35 d, the firmness of fruits stored at 0 ℃ was significantly higher than that of fruits stored at 8 ℃ or LTC treatment, with no significant difference between the latter two. The LTC treatment had a significantly lower browning index at 28 d and 35 d than the other two treatments, with no significant difference observed between the 0 ℃ and 8 ℃ treatments. A total of 74 volatile compounds were detected via HS-SPME-GC-MS, and 27 were common in all of the conditions, mainly including aldehydes, esters, terpenes, ketones, aromatic compounds and others. Aldehydes were the most abundant volatile compounds. At 0 d of storage, hexanal was the most abundant aldehyde with a content of 48.25 μg/kg, followed by nonanal and (E)-2-hexenal, with contents of 23.25 μg/kg and 21.93 μg/kg, respectively. The total content of volatile esters ranked second among all categories, and methyl 2-methylbutyrate was the most abundant ester at 0 d with a content of 84.71 μg/kg. As storage time prolonged, the total ester content of all treatments decreased continuously. PLS-DA identified seven key aroma substances with significant differences in content across different storage modes based on variable importance in projection (VIP) scores, namely geranylacetone, α-pinene, p-cymene, nonanal, octanal, (E)-2-hexenal, and methyl 2-methylbutyrate. After 35 d of storage, the 0 ℃ treatment resulted in higher contents of geranylacetone, α-pinene, p-cymene, and nonanal. The LTC treatment induced higher contents of p-cymene, nonanal, octanal, (E)-2-hexenal, and methyl 2-methylbutyrate. The 8 ℃ treatment was characterized only by a higher content of methyl 2-methylbutyrate. Based on the changes in fruit firmness, browning index, as well as the category and content of aroma components during storage, this study concludes that LTC can better maintain the postharvest quality of loquat after prolonged storage, characterized by lower browning degree and superior aroma retention effect.

  • 加载中
  • [1] Zhang S, Sun H M, Wang J Y, et al. The regulatory mechanisms and control technologies of chilling injury and fungal diseases of postharvest loquat fruit[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(24): 3472. doi: 10.3390/plants11243472

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Shah H M S, Khan A S, Singh Z, et al. Postharvest biology and technology of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.)[J]. Foods, 2023, 12(6): 1329. doi: 10.3390/foods12061329

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Huang G L, Liu T T, Mao X M, et al. Insights into the volatile flavor and quality profiles of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) during shelf-life via HS-GC-IMS, E-nose, and E-tongue[J]. Food Chemistry: X, 2023, 20: 100886. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100886

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Wang P, Zhang B, Li X, et al. Ethylene signal transduction elements involved in chilling injury in non-climacteric loquat fruit[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010, 61(1): 179-190. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp302

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] 吴光斌, 陈发河, 张其标, 等. 热激处理对冷藏枇杷果实冷害的生理作用[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2004, 13(2): 1-5.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 郑永华, 李三玉, 席玙芳. 枇杷冷藏过程中果肉木质化与细胞壁物质变化的关系[J]. 植物生理学报, 2000, 26(4): 306-310.

    Google Scholar

    [7] Sung J, Frost S, Suh J H. Progress in flavor research in food: flavor chemistry in food quality, safety, and sensory properties[J]. Food Chemistry: X, 2025, 25: 102071. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.102071

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Planeta D, Farina V, Bambina P, et al. Analysis of aroma compounds of nine autochthonous and non-autochthonous loquat cultivars grown in Sicily[J]. Italian Journal of Food Science, 2021, 33(4): 33-42. doi: 10.15586/ijfs.v33i4.2104

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] 秦文, 姚昕, 刘维, 等. 不同贮藏温度对大五星枇杷果实保鲜效果的研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2005, 34(5): 21-24.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 秦文, 姚昕, 陈宗道, 等. "大五星" 枇杷冷藏过程中采后生理特性的研究[J]. 中国食品学报, 2006, 6(1): 151-156.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 江国良, 陈栋, 谢红江, 等. 程序降温对大五星枇杷果实贮藏品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2009, 22(3): 750-753.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 付婷婷. "大五星"枇杷采后低温冷害及变温处理效果的研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2011: 38-46.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 付婷婷, 秦文, 张正周. 冷害对采后"大五星"枇杷果实贮藏品质及木质化败坏的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2011, 29(1): 69-74.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 郑现容, 鲜双, 谢鸿林, 等. 梯度预冷复合低温贮藏对大五星枇杷采后品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2024, 50(22): 254-260.

    Google Scholar

    [15] Sivankalyani V, Maoz I, Feygenberg O, et al. Chilling stress upregulates α-linolenic acid-oxidation pathway and induces volatiles of C6 and C9 aldehydes in mango fruit[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2017, 65(3): 632-638. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04355

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Li X Y, Li G, Wang H J, et al. Characterization of volatile flavor profiles in three peach cultivars during postharvest storage at various temperatures using HS-SPME-GC-MS[J]. Food Chemistry: X, 2025, 28: 102554. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102554

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Zontov Y V, Rodionova O Y, Kucheryavskiy S V, et al. PLS-DA-A MATLAB GUI tool for hard and soft approaches to partial least squares discriminant analysis[J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2020, 203: 104064. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104064

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Rodionova O Y, Pomerantsev A L. Multiclass partial least squares discriminant analysis: taking new ways: a perspective[J]. Journal of Chemometrics, 2025, 39(11): e70078. doi: 10.1002/cem.70078

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] 徐倩. 枇杷果实木质化的MYB转录调控[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2014: 20.

    Google Scholar

    [20] Cai C, Xu C J, Shan L L, et al. Low temperature conditioning reduces postharvest chilling injury in loquat fruit[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2006, 41(3): 252-259. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.04.015

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] 金鹏, 吕慕雯, 孙萃萃, 等. MeJA与低温预贮对枇杷冷害和活性氧代谢的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2012, 39(3): 461-468.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 王毓宁, 马佳佳, 张鹏, 等. 基于HS-SPME-GC-MS与电子舌分析冷藏冠玉枇杷的风味特性[J]. 包装工程, 2020, 41(23): 11-18.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 袁婷, 陈薇薇, 孙海艳, 等. 不同果肉类型枇杷果肉挥发性成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(24): 209-217.

    Google Scholar

    [24] Besada C, Salvador A, Sdiri S, et al. A combination of physiological and chemometrics analyses reveals the main associations between quality and ripening traits and volatiles in two loquat cultivars[J]. Metabolomics, 2013, 9(2): 324-336. doi: 10.1007/s11306-012-0447-z

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] 蒋际谋, 胡文舜, 许奇志, 等. 枇杷品种香甜和解放钟及两者杂交子代优系果实香气成分分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2014, 15(4): 894-900.

    Google Scholar

    [26] Sun H Y, Chen W W, Jiang Y, et al. Characterization of volatiles in red-and white-fleshed loquat (Eriobotrya japonica) fruits by electronic nose and headspace solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2020, 40(suppl 1): 21-32. doi: 10.1590/fst.27318

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] 席万鹏. 桃果实香气物质生物合成研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2013, 40(9): 1679-1690.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 李怡诺. 不同产区枇杷果实品质研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2023: 41-46.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 徐慧, 姚霞珍, 佟珂珂, 等. 3种牡丹花器官不同部位挥发性成分分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(3): 63-69.

    Google Scholar

    [30] 张映萍, 何江斌, 黄梅, 等. HS-SPEM-GC-MS结合PLS-DA分析三种姜科植物果实挥发性香气成分[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2024, 36(8): 1368-1377.

    Google Scholar

    [31] 张鹏. '梨香'菊花香成分鉴定及香气特征分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(2): 496-512.

    Google Scholar

    [32] 常文俊, 阎宁, 沈丸钧, 等. 程序降温处理对黄皮果实贮藏品质和采后生理的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(6): 1181-1187.

    Google Scholar

    [33] 常文俊. 热处理和程序降温处理对黄皮果实贮藏效果及HSPs基因表达的影响[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2019: 24-28.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 郑现容. 梯度预冷及CMCS/TP浸涂结合低温处理对大五星枇杷贮藏品质的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2024: 53-60.

    Google Scholar

    [35] 石飞. 基于转录组和miRNA测序的冷藏南果梨香气变淡机理研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2018: 86-95.

    Google Scholar

    [36] 宋方圆. NO协同程序降温调控蟠桃香气物质代谢的机理研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2024: 76-77.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(5)

Article Metrics

Article views(403) PDF downloads(63) Cited by(0)

Access History

Effects of low-temperature storage conditions on aroma compounds of 'Da wuxing' loquat fruit based on Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis(PLS-DA)

    Corresponding author: Liang Guolu

Abstract: 

To investigate the effect of different storage temperatures on the postharvest quality of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl. cv. Dawuxing), red-fleshed 'Dawuxing' loquat was used as experimental material, and three low-temperature treatments were set up: 0 ℃, 8 ℃ and Low Temperature Conditioning (LTC). After 35 d of storage, fruit firmness and browning index were measured. Aroma volatiles of loquat were detected by Head Space Solid-Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Differential aroma compounds were analyzed, and fruit quality was comprehensively evaluated combined with Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA). The results showed no significant differences in fruit firmness among the three treatments before 21 d of storage. However, at 28 d and 35 d, the firmness of fruits stored at 0 ℃ was significantly higher than that of fruits stored at 8 ℃ or LTC treatment, with no significant difference between the latter two. The LTC treatment had a significantly lower browning index at 28 d and 35 d than the other two treatments, with no significant difference observed between the 0 ℃ and 8 ℃ treatments. A total of 74 volatile compounds were detected via HS-SPME-GC-MS, and 27 were common in all of the conditions, mainly including aldehydes, esters, terpenes, ketones, aromatic compounds and others. Aldehydes were the most abundant volatile compounds. At 0 d of storage, hexanal was the most abundant aldehyde with a content of 48.25 μg/kg, followed by nonanal and (E)-2-hexenal, with contents of 23.25 μg/kg and 21.93 μg/kg, respectively. The total content of volatile esters ranked second among all categories, and methyl 2-methylbutyrate was the most abundant ester at 0 d with a content of 84.71 μg/kg. As storage time prolonged, the total ester content of all treatments decreased continuously. PLS-DA identified seven key aroma substances with significant differences in content across different storage modes based on variable importance in projection (VIP) scores, namely geranylacetone, α-pinene, p-cymene, nonanal, octanal, (E)-2-hexenal, and methyl 2-methylbutyrate. After 35 d of storage, the 0 ℃ treatment resulted in higher contents of geranylacetone, α-pinene, p-cymene, and nonanal. The LTC treatment induced higher contents of p-cymene, nonanal, octanal, (E)-2-hexenal, and methyl 2-methylbutyrate. The 8 ℃ treatment was characterized only by a higher content of methyl 2-methylbutyrate. Based on the changes in fruit firmness, browning index, as well as the category and content of aroma components during storage, this study concludes that LTC can better maintain the postharvest quality of loquat after prolonged storage, characterized by lower browning degree and superior aroma retention effect.

  • 开放科学(资源服务)标识码(OSID):

  • 枇杷(Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.)成熟于初夏高温多湿季节,果实生理活动旺盛,含水量高、果皮薄,常温下极易腐烂变质。低温能降低采后果实的生理代谢活性,明显抑制呼吸和乙烯释放,同时抑制微生物活性,减少果实腐烂,因此,低温贮藏是采后果蔬贮藏保鲜最通用有效的方法,也是枇杷贮藏保鲜最常用的方法[1-3]。但是,温度过低时易诱发冷害或冻害,表现为果实木质化加速[4],伴随果肉质地生硬,粗糙少汁,果皮难剥,并伴有果皮和果肉组织褐变等[5-6]

    香气是区分一种水果与另一种水果的关键品质指标,也是消费者购买决策的主要驱动因素之一[7]。香气通常源自植物产生的挥发性化合物,包括酯类、醛类、醇类、内酯类、萜类、羰基化合物及一些含硫化合物等,它们通过累加、协同或抑制作用共同决定果实香气的差异[8]。果实香气是决定果实品质的重要因素,采后果实中的香气会随贮藏进程发生变化。

    “大五星”枇杷是重庆、四川等地的主栽优良枇杷品种。已有学者研究了“大五星”枇杷在采后不同贮藏温度下生理指标的变化[9-14]。研究发现,8 ℃是“大五星”枇杷果实适宜的贮藏温度,4 ℃以下易发生冷害,而程序降温可明显降低贮藏过程中的果实腐烂率,减少水分散失,保持汁液丰富,同时减轻果实褐变程度,口感风味好,并有效延长货架期。低温打破香气物质的动态平衡,使香气组分比例失衡,酯类含量显著下降,整体香气复杂度降低[15-16]。PLS-DA是一种有监督的多变量统计方法,在代谢组学和食品科学研究中被广泛用于高维数据的降维、分类以及关键差异标记物的筛选[17-18]。因此,本研究以主栽枇杷品种“大五星”为材料,探索低温冷害、最适温度及程序降温贮藏条件下果实随贮藏时间的延长其香气成分及含量的动态变化,并基于PLS-DA统计方法确定3种不同低温贮藏方式下有显著贡献的香气物质,以期为枇杷采后果实香气变化的相关研究提供参考,为提升果品贮藏品质提供一定的理论依据。

1.   材料与方法
  • “大五星”枇杷采自西南大学合川农场渭沱实验基地,当天运回实验室,挑选大小相对均匀,成熟度基本相同,无病虫害、机械伤的果实,经预冷后设置3个处理。① 0 ℃处理:直接置于(0±0.5) ℃环境中贮藏;② 8 ℃处理:直接置于(8±0.5) ℃环境中贮藏;③程序降温(LTC):果实在5 ℃下处理6 d后转到(0±0.5) ℃贮藏。相对湿度90%~95%。果实用聚乙烯(PE)薄膜包装后装入塑料筐中,薄膜上打直径1 mm圆孔,不扎袋口,每袋30个。试验采用完全随机设计,设3个生物学重复,每重复10个果实,分别于0 d、7 d、14 d、21 d、28 d、35 d取样。

  • 硬度测定采用TA-XT plus型质构分析仪(Stable Micro Systems,UK),采用PS探头(直径5 mm)。参考徐倩[19]的方法:测定深度4 mm,测前速度3mm/s,测定速度1 mm/s,测后速度10 mm/s。每个果实赤道面(去除小块果皮)测定两次,间隔90°,以单个果实2次测定数值的平均值作为一个重复,单果重复10次。单位用牛顿(N)表示。

    褐变指数的统计和计算参考Cai等[20]的方法,果皮褐变按褐变面积分为5级。0级:无褐变;1级:褐变面积<5%;2级:褐变面积5%~25%;3级:褐变面积25%~50%;4级:褐变面积>50%。

  • 果实香气成分采用顶空固相微萃取技术(HS-SPME)和气相色谱-质谱联用仪(GC-MS)进行测定。称取5 g枇杷果实冷冻样品,加液氮磨成粉末,放入20 mL顶空萃取瓶中,加入5 mL饱和氯化钠溶液和壬酸乙酯(内标),封口后混匀,置于AOC-5000自动进样萃取装置的萃取盘,顶空萃取30 min后进入GC-MS(岛津QP2010气相色谱-质谱联用仪,日本)系统检测。HS-SPME针头为65 μm PDMS/DVB(Sigma公司,美国),设置色谱条件。色谱柱:Rtx-5MS(30 m×0.25 μm×0.25 mm);升温程序:初始温度40 ℃,保持2 min,以3 ℃/min的速率升至150 ℃,保持1 min,再以10 ℃/min的速率升至220 ℃,保持1 min,最后以5 ℃/min的速率升至240 ℃,保持2 min;载气为氦气,流速1 mL/min,恒线速率,不分流进样。MS条件:离子源为电子电离源,离子源温度230 ℃,接口温度240 ℃,电子能量70 eV,扫描范围35~350 m/z。

  • 数据分析运用计算机检索并与图谱库(NIST 08)的标准质谱图对照,结合相关文献和保留指数RI(Retention Index),确认香气物质的化学成分,按内标法算出样品各个组分的含量。偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)和热图分析利用Metaboanalyst 5.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca)开展,并计算变量重要性投影值(VIP),采用SPSS 18.0进行数据分析。

2.   结果与分析
  • “大五星”枇杷采后3种处理条件下的果实硬度和褐变指数见图 1。21 d时,3种贮藏方式果实硬度变化差异不显著;28 d和35 d时,0 ℃贮藏果实的硬度显著高于8 ℃和LTC处理,8 ℃与LTC处理间差异不显著。其中,35 d时果实的硬度比贮藏前(0 d)增加28%。

    3种贮藏条件下褐变起始时间不同:8 ℃和LTC处理在7 d时已有褐变发生,而0 ℃处理7 d后才出现(图 1);14 d、21 d时,3种贮藏方式的褐变指数差异不显著,但21 d后,褐变指数上升趋势则明显增强;28 d和35 d时,0 ℃和8 ℃处理的褐变指数显著高于LTC处理,0 ℃和8 ℃处理两者间差异不显著。

    综合来看,贮藏时间延长到28 d和35 d时,LTC处理对减缓果实硬度增加和降低果实褐变效果较好。

  • 采用HS-SPME-GC-MS分析3种贮藏温度下枇杷果肉的香气成分,共检测到74种成分,包括醛类15种、醇类10种、萜烯类18种、酯类10种、酮类8种、酸类1种、芳香族类8种和其他类4种。本研究各贮藏期内共有的成分为27种。包括9种醛类:分别是己醛、反-2-己烯醛、正庚醛、辛醛、壬醛、反-2-壬烯醛、癸醛、β-环柠檬醛、β-环高柠檬醛;3种酯类:2-甲基丁酸甲酯、丁酸辛酯、邻苯二甲酸二乙酯;5种酮类:3-辛酮、莰酮、香叶基丙酮、β-紫罗兰酮、二氢猕猴桃内酯;3种萜烯:对伞花烃、α-蒎烯、γ-松油烯;4种芳香类:1-甲基乙基苯、1-乙基-2-甲基苯、1,2,3-三甲苯、1,2,3,5-四甲苯;3种其他成分:萘、麝香草酚以及甲氧基-苯肟。醛类是总含量最高的物质,0 d时为115.69 μg/kg;在整个贮藏过程中,8 ℃和0 ℃两个处理下醛类总含量总体上呈下降趋势,8 ℃处理下在35 d时最低,为54.32 μg/kg,而0 ℃处理在14 d时最低,为36.20 μg/kg;LTC处理的总含量则为先下降后上升的趋势,到35 d时达到130.95 μg/kg。酯类的总含量仅次于醛类,在0 d时为96.96 μg/kg,3种贮藏方式下总含量均不断减少。萜烯类的总含量在0 d时为22.20 μg/kg,3个处理含量均不断降低,其中葎草烯、γ-衣兰油烯和δ-杜松烯仅在0 d中检测到。酮类的总含量在8 ℃处理下不断降低,到35 d时下降了62.5%,为3.37 μg/kg;在LTC和0 ℃处理下则不断增加,为15.44 μg/kg和20.21 μg/kg。仅检测到一种酸类,即2-甲基丁酸,含量总体呈下降趋势。共检测到10种醇类,贮藏期间含量均不断增加,但在28 d和35 d时,LTC和0 ℃处理的总含量明显高于8 ℃处理。芳香族类物质的总含量则整体上呈上升变化(图 2)。

    从贮藏期内香气成分总含量变化可知,8 ℃处理在14 d时总含量最高,之后不断降低,在35 d时最低;而LTC和0 ℃处理的总含量在35 d最高,但仍低于0 d时的总含量,表明低温贮藏导致香气总含量减少。

  • 将3种贮藏方式下采收当天及采后贮藏期间检测出的24种共有芳香物质(萘、麝香草酚、甲氧基-苯肟除外)绘制为热图并进行聚类分析(图 3)。结果显示,Ⅰ类中主要是醛类和酯类,壬醛和辛醛是0 d时含量较高的脂肪族醛类,分别为23.25 μg/kg和7.48 μg/kg,C7-C12的脂肪族醛类是醛香型化合物的重要代表。壬醛在0 ℃和LTC处理下含量总体呈上升的趋势,8 ℃处理下含量则不断降低,35 d时,0 ℃和LTC处理间差异不显著,但均显著高于8 ℃处理。辛醛在3种贮藏方式下呈下降趋势,在35 d时,0 ℃和LTC处理间差异不显著,但LTC显著高于8 ℃处理;癸醛在3种贮藏方式下含量变化无显著差异,0 ℃和LTC处理间差异也不显著,但两者均显著高于8 ℃处理。0 d时正己醛含量最高,为48.25 μg/kg,正己醛在0 ℃处理下总体上呈下降趋势,在LTC处理下呈先下降后上升趋势,8 ℃处理下呈现先下降后上升又下降的规律,35 d时LTC处理的含量显著高于0 ℃和8 ℃处理。反-2-己烯醛在3种贮藏方式下均表现为下降趋势,但35 d时LTC显著高于其他两种处理。反-2-壬烯醛在8 ℃处理下先升高后下降,在0 ℃和LTC处理下则呈升高的趋势,35 d时LTC显著高于8 ℃处理。2-甲基丁酸甲酯是0 d时含量最高的酯类,含量为84.71 μg/kg,占0 d时总香气的87.4%,贮藏35 d后显著降低;0 ℃、8 ℃和LTC处理后分别为2.89、5.23和5.10 μg/kg,8 ℃和LTC处理间无显著差异,但均显著高于0 ℃处理。0 d时含量次之的酯为邻苯二甲酸二乙酯,为9.53 μg/kg,具有微弱的芳香气味,是香蕉、成熟木瓜中的一种香气成分。

    Ⅱ类中主要是脱辅基类胡萝卜素类香气物质,其中香叶基丙酮、β-紫罗兰酮和二氢猕猴桃内酯属于低阈值香气物质,35 d时,LTC和0 ℃处理的二氢猕猴桃内酯显著高于8 ℃处理。香叶基丙酮的阈值为60 nL/L,具有木兰、青草和花香,35 d时,8 ℃、LTC和0 ℃处理分别为0.28、0.98和2.56 μg/kg,0 ℃处理显著高于其他两种处理。β-紫罗兰酮带有紫罗兰木本和浆果的特有香气,在水中的阈值为0.007 μg/kg,0 d时β-紫罗兰酮的含量为2.53 μg/kg,占酮类香气总含量的28.1%;35 d时,8 ℃、LTC和0 ℃中的含量分别为1.16、7.19和11.11 μg/kg,分别占总酮类的34.4%、46.6%和55.0%,3个处理间差异达显著水平。β-环柠檬醛赋予新鲜枇杷甘草气味。

    Ⅲ类中主要是萜烯类和芳香族类,α-蒎烯、γ-松油烯和对伞花烃属单萜类。α-蒎烯具有松香气味,油中阈值为2.08 μg/mg;γ-松油烯的油中阈值为2.89 μg/mg,具有草本香气;对伞花烃具有柑橘香味,水中阈值为0.1 μg/mg。0 d时对伞花烃、α-蒎烯、γ-松油烯的含量分别为0.16、0.22和1.89 μg/kg;对伞花烃和γ-松油烯在8 ℃处理下无显著差异,在0 ℃和LTC处理下则呈上升趋势;α-蒎烯在0 ℃和LTC处理下14 d时含量最高,分别为0.45和0.62 μg/kg,而8 ℃处理在21 d时最高,为0.65 μg/kg。α-蒎烯、γ-松油烯和对伞花烃等单萜类是宽皮柑橘、柚子和晚熟甜橙精油中的主要香气成分。

  • 偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)是一种多变量统计方法,可以有效区分组间差异。为了从整体上评判不同贮藏温度下枇杷果实香气的差异,以不同贮藏温度和时间下的共有香气物质及0 d含量为变量,对数据归一化处理后进行PLS-DA分析,置换检验结果通过了验证,表明构建的PLS-DA模型结果可靠。PLS-DA模型的前3个成分解释了60.1%的香气差异(图 4)。该模型可以较好区分相同贮藏时间下不同贮藏温度的枇杷果实样品。

    变量重要性投影(VIP)主要用于说明自变量在解释因变量时的权重,通常VIP大于1的物质表示在PLS-DA判别过程中为重要差异化合物,这些物质被认为在模型解释中具有显著贡献。本研究中VIP大于1的香气物质有7种(图 5),分别是对伞花烃、香叶基丙酮、辛醛、α-蒎烯、壬醛、反-2-己烯醛和2-甲基丁酸甲酯。贮藏14 d、21 d、28 d、35 d时,LTC处理对伞花烃的含量均显著高于8 ℃处理,其中14 d、28 d、35 d时LTC和0 ℃处理间差异不显著。贮藏7 d、14 d、28 d时,LTC处理的壬醛含量显著高于其他两处理;35 d时,LTC与0 ℃间差异不显著,但均显著高于8 ℃处理。35 d时,0 ℃处理的香叶基丙酮、α-蒎烯、对伞花烃和壬醛含量较高,LTC处理中关键差异物质为对伞花烃、壬醛、辛醛、反-2-己烯醛和2-甲基丁酸甲酯,其中醛类物质种类多且含量较高,对枇杷清香属性贡献显著。8 ℃处理仅2-甲基丁酸甲酯含量较高。

3.   讨论与结论
  • 适宜低温是果实采后长期贮藏最主要的技术措施,可有效延长贮藏期。本研究结果显示,0 ℃贮藏7 d后才出现褐变,而8 ℃和LTC处理在7 d时已有褐变,这些现象表明,低温贮藏可降低果实褐变发生率,提高好果率,但会诱发冷害。与0 ℃和8 ℃相比,LTC贮藏可减缓果实硬度增加和褐变指数上升,表明LTC处理能有效减轻木质化症状,减缓冷害症状,较好地保持果实品质,这与相关研究结果基本一致[11, 20-21]

    本研究基于PLS-DA的多元统计分析获得7种重要差异香气物质,分别是对伞花烃、香叶基丙酮、辛醛、α-蒎烯、壬醛、反-2-己烯醛和2-甲基丁酸甲酯。其中8 ℃处理组的反-2-己烯醛含量呈下降趋势。王毓宁等[22]报道,随着贮藏时间延长,(6±0.5) ℃贮藏的“冠玉”枇杷中反-2-己烯醛逐渐增加,与本研究结果相反,可能源于品种差异。壬醛赋予水果果香和柑橘香,本研究中0 d时壬醛占醛类总含量的20%。袁婷等[23]对7个白肉品种枇杷和15个红肉品种枇杷成熟果实的研究表明,壬醛是对果肉风味贡献率最高的挥发性物质,与本研究结论一致。2-甲基丁酸甲酯是0 d时含量最高的酯,付婷婷[12]报道0 d时含量最高的酯为油酸甲酯,贮藏中均能检测到棕榈酸甲酯,与本研究结果不太一致。袁婷等[23]在成熟的“大五星”果实中也检测到了2-甲基丁酸甲酯。付婷婷[12]采用同时蒸馏萃取法提取“大五星”样品,而本研究和袁婷等[23]采用的是顶空固相微萃取法,差异可能源于萃取方法的不同。王毓宁等[22]的研究表明,2-甲基丁酸甲酯是“冠玉”枇杷的特征挥发性物质,含量在贮藏中逐渐降低。2-甲基丁酸甲酯具有新鲜水果香味,在“Algerie”枇杷发育过程中被检测到,含量随果实成熟不断增加,但在“Golden”枇杷中却未被检测出[24]。蒋际谋等[25]在“香甜”和“钟香25号”两个枇杷品种中检测到了2-甲基丁酸甲酯,但在“解放钟”和“香钟11号”枇杷中却未发现,而Sun等[26]在“香钟11号”枇杷中检测到了该物质;这些研究表明,香气物质的生物合成受到遗传、成熟阶段、采后贮藏以及生长环境等因素影响[27-28]

    PLS-DA作为一种有监督的多元统计降维与判别方法,在香气的客观评价中被广泛应用[29-31],可衡量变量对分组区分的贡献度。徐慧等[29]依据检测的挥发性成分构建PLS-DA模型,将3种野生牡丹分类,筛选得到15种差异性成分。通过建立的PLS-DA模型,张映萍等[30]从草果、艳山姜、草豆蔻3种姜科植物果实中筛选出21种VIP>1的关键挥发性香气成分。张鹏等[31]通过“梨香”菊花朵挥发物的PLS-DA模型,利用VIP值和P值筛选得到24种重要差异性成分,对区分不同开花阶段/时间点下“梨香”菊花朵挥发物具有重要作用。研究表明“大五星”枇杷果实在4 ℃下贮藏时,随着贮藏期的延长,会诱发冷害发生,出现木质化败坏[9],8 ℃是“大五星”枇杷较适宜的贮藏温度,贮藏期为20 d左右[9]。程序降温过程中,因果实逐渐适应低温的冷锻炼[32],减轻了低温对细胞膜、细胞壁的损害程度[26],最终减缓果皮的褐变程度[32-33],从而保持较好的贮藏品质。本研究中,35 d时,LTC处理包含较多VIP>1的重要差异香气物质,0 ℃处理次之,8 ℃处理仅2-甲基丁酸甲酯含量较高。郑现容[34]的研究表明,梯度预冷处理下关键风味物质(ROAV>1)有7种:2-戊基呋喃、2-乙基己醇、2-壬烯醛、庚醛、2-十一烷、异戊醇、2-辛烯醛,而直接预冷处理下仅为前4种,表明梯度预冷处理可保留更多关键风味物质。此外,LTC处理一定程度上缓解了冷藏南果梨香气变淡的问题[35],蟠桃果实采用一氧化氮结合LTC处理可以延缓果实中体现桃成熟芳香风味的酯类物质的下降,保持贮藏后期芳香风味[36];基于本研究结果,后续可结合感官评价或GC-O试验,对不同贮藏方式下的果实香气变化情况进行较为全面的评价。本研究结果表明,3种低温贮藏条件下,结合硬度、褐变指数及香气成分的变化,LTC处理在延长贮藏时间后能更好地维持枇杷的采后品质,表现出较低的褐变程度和较优的香气保留效果。

Figure (5)  Reference (36)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return