Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2018 Volume 43 Issue 5
Article Contents

GUO Wen-xin, WU Wen-feng. On Turnover and Liquidity Analysis of China and US Stock Market[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 43(5): 64-68. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.05.011
Citation: GUO Wen-xin, WU Wen-feng. On Turnover and Liquidity Analysis of China and US Stock Market[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 43(5): 64-68. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2018.05.011

On Turnover and Liquidity Analysis of China and US Stock Market

More Information
  • Received Date: 20/03/2017
  • Turnover is generally used to measure liquidity in China and always in high level in China stock market. This paper compares liquidity of China and US stock market from the perspectives of market depth and width through 10-year historical data from July 2005 to June 2015 and finds out that liquidity of China stock market is indeed better than that of US stock market. It would be better to increase dividend ratio and refrain speculation to adjust this high liquidity resulted by excessive pursuit of short-term capital gain. But also, turnover has low interpretation efficiency of liquidity. For China Stock Market, Martin Index, adjusted by price and shares outstanding, and Execution Cost can explain stock return better, making them more suitable liquidity depth and width indicators.
  • 加载中
  • [1] PÁSTOR L. Stambaugh R F:Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns[J].Journal of Political Economy,2003,111(3):642-685.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 靳云汇, 杨文.上海股市流动性影响因素实证分析[J].金融研究, 2002, 06:12-21.

    Google Scholar

    [3] ROLL R.A Simple Implicit Measure of the Effective Bid-ask Spread in an Efficient Market[J].The Journal of Finance,1984,39(4):1127-1139.

    Google Scholar

    [4] HASBROUCK J,SCHWARTZ R A.Liquidity and Execution Costs in Equity Markets[J].Journal of Portfolio Management,1988,14(3):10-16.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 仲黎明, 刘海龙, 吴冲锋.中国股票市场流动性:过高还是过低——一个国际比较视角的分析[J].当代经济科学, 2003, 25(2):58-61, 94-95.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 孙培源, 施东晖.微观结构、流动性与买卖价差:一个基于上海股市的经验研究[J].世界经济, 2002, 4:69-72.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 应展宇.中国股票市场流动性研究[J].证券市场导报, 2001, 7:63-68.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 王聪, 唐静武.中国股票市场流动性的比较研究[J].南方金融, 2009, 5:40-45.

    Google Scholar

    [9] FAMA E F,FRENCH K R.Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1993,33(1):3-56.

    Google Scholar

    [10] FAMA E F,FRENCH K R.Profitability,Investment and Average Returns[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2006,82(3):491-518.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(1485) PDF downloads(83) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

On Turnover and Liquidity Analysis of China and US Stock Market

Abstract: Turnover is generally used to measure liquidity in China and always in high level in China stock market. This paper compares liquidity of China and US stock market from the perspectives of market depth and width through 10-year historical data from July 2005 to June 2015 and finds out that liquidity of China stock market is indeed better than that of US stock market. It would be better to increase dividend ratio and refrain speculation to adjust this high liquidity resulted by excessive pursuit of short-term capital gain. But also, turnover has low interpretation efficiency of liquidity. For China Stock Market, Martin Index, adjusted by price and shares outstanding, and Execution Cost can explain stock return better, making them more suitable liquidity depth and width indicators.

Reference (10)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return