Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2022 Volume 1 Issue 6
Article Contents

LI Fengwei, JIANG Long, HU Litao, et al. Effects of Several Biocontrol Agents on Disease Resistance and Agronomic Characters of 'Yunyan 87'[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (6): 60-70. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.06.007
Citation: LI Fengwei, JIANG Long, HU Litao, et al. Effects of Several Biocontrol Agents on Disease Resistance and Agronomic Characters of 'Yunyan 87'[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (6): 60-70. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.06.007

Effects of Several Biocontrol Agents on Disease Resistance and Agronomic Characters of 'Yunyan 87'

More Information
  • Received Date: 28/10/2022
  • MSC: S572

  • In order to clarify the effects of biocontrol agents on common tobacco diseases, five biocontrol agents were selected in this study, and their effects on tobacco diseases and agronomic characters were analyzed. It was found that Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus thuringiensis had good control effects on tobacco virus disease, tobacco wildfire disease and tobacco brown spot disease. The effects of the two biocontrol agents on the occurrence of tobacco diseases and agronomic traits were further compared between root irrigation and foliar spraying in different periods and with different application methods. It was found that the best application period and the best application method for control of Bacillus subtilis were the middle growth stage and foliar spraying treatment, respectively. The best application time and the best application method for control of Bacillus thuringiensis were the middle growth stage and root irrigation treatment, respectively, which could significantly reduce the occurrence of tobacco diseases and improve the agronomic characteristics of tobacco. This study provides a theoretical basis for tobacco disease control and improvement of tobacco agronomic characters.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 陈瑞泰, 朱贤朝, 王智发, 等. 全国16个主产烟省(区)烟草侵染性病害调研报告[J]. 中国烟草科学, 1997, 18(4):1-7.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 陈海涛. 重庆市烟区主要烟草病害及综防技术[J]. 植物医生, 2007, 20(5):28-29.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 王琳. 植物病害综合防治技术[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2017, 33(3):225-226.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 卜元卿, 孔源, 智勇, 等. 化学农药对环境的污染及其防控对策建议[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2014, 16(2):19-25.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 张杰, 董莎萌, 王伟, 等. 植物免疫研究与抗病虫绿色防控:进展、机遇与挑战[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2019, 49(11):1479-1507.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 彭迎春, 吴文信, 李思军, 等. 桂阳县烟草病虫害绿色防控工作现状及建议[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(24):88-89, 92.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 贺海滨. 烟草病虫害发生规律与绿色防控措施[J]. 世界热带农业信息, 2022(1):35-36.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 邱德文. 我国植物病害生物防治的现状及发展策略[J]. 植物保护, 2010, 36(4):15-18, 35.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 张俊华. 微生物代谢产物作用于植物的研究探讨[J]. 生命科学研究, 2007, 11(S1):44-47.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 陈志谊. 芽孢杆菌类生物杀菌剂的研发与应用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2015, 31(5):723-732.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 朱玥妍, 刘姣, 杜春梅. 芽孢杆菌生物防治植物病害研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(34):16635-16638.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 何亚登. 2种生防菌的发酵、土壤定殖及防治烟草土传病害的研究[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2019.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 韩长志. 植物病害生防菌的研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2015, 34(1):33-37, 25.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 赵荣艳, 杨靖华, 蒋士君. 烟草病害生物防治研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 34(22):5918-5919, 5968.

    Google Scholar

    [15] HARMAN G E. Overview of Mechanisms and Uses of TrichodermaSpp[J]. Phytopathology, 2006, 96(2):190-194.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 陈志谊. 芽孢杆菌类生物杀菌剂的研发与应用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2015, 31(5):723-732.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 孙广正, 姚拓, 赵桂琴, 等. 荧光假单胞菌防治植物病害研究现状与展望[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(4):174-190.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 王星云, 宋卡魏, 张荣意. 枯草芽孢杆菌菌剂的开发应用[J]. 广西热带农业, 2007(2):32-35.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 李锡宏, 余君, 陈守文, 等. 防治烟草赤星病的生防菌剂田间对比试验[J]. 湖北植保, 2018(2):7-8.

    Google Scholar

    [20] LVX, YUANM T, PEIY H, etal. The Enhancement of Antiviral Activity of Chloroinconazide by Aglinate-Based Nanogel and Its Plant Growth Promotion Effect[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2021, 69(17):4992-5002.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 李俊喜, 刘润进. 菌根真菌菌剂防治作物土传病害潜力分析[J]. 植物病理学报, 2007, 37(1):1-8.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 吴剑, 何军, 李祥军, 等. 诱导抗病剂与生防制剂在烟草上的防效研究[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2015, 37(6):7-10, 17.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 孙宏伟, 元野, 杨晓敏, 等. 烟草野火病拮抗生防菌的筛选、鉴定与应用[J]. 烟草科技, 2012, 45(8):84-88.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 王炳豪. 不同时期施药对烟草青枯病防治效果研究[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2009(3):51-52.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 刘畅, 姚晨虓, 李小杰, 等. 复合生防菌剂对田间烟草根茎类病害的防治效果[J]. 烟草科技, 2021, 54(11):18-24.

    Google Scholar

    [26] 方明, 殷全玉, 吴文信, 等. 高碳基肥料配施微生物菌剂对烟叶综合性状的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(12):12-14, 18.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(603) PDF downloads(358) Cited by(0)

Access History

Effects of Several Biocontrol Agents on Disease Resistance and Agronomic Characters of 'Yunyan 87'

Abstract: In order to clarify the effects of biocontrol agents on common tobacco diseases, five biocontrol agents were selected in this study, and their effects on tobacco diseases and agronomic characters were analyzed. It was found that Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus thuringiensis had good control effects on tobacco virus disease, tobacco wildfire disease and tobacco brown spot disease. The effects of the two biocontrol agents on the occurrence of tobacco diseases and agronomic traits were further compared between root irrigation and foliar spraying in different periods and with different application methods. It was found that the best application period and the best application method for control of Bacillus subtilis were the middle growth stage and foliar spraying treatment, respectively. The best application time and the best application method for control of Bacillus thuringiensis were the middle growth stage and root irrigation treatment, respectively, which could significantly reduce the occurrence of tobacco diseases and improve the agronomic characteristics of tobacco. This study provides a theoretical basis for tobacco disease control and improvement of tobacco agronomic characters.

Reference (26)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return