Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2022 Volume 1 Issue 6
Article Contents

JIANG Long, HU Litao, WANG Qin, et al. Evaluation of Disease Resistance of Four Tobacco Varieties[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (6): 71-77. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.06.008
Citation: JIANG Long, HU Litao, WANG Qin, et al. Evaluation of Disease Resistance of Four Tobacco Varieties[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (6): 71-77. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.06.008

Evaluation of Disease Resistance of Four Tobacco Varieties

More Information
  • Received Date: 26/07/2022
  • MSC: S572

  • Chongqing is an important tobacco production area. In order to screen the excellent tobacco varieties suitable for production in Chongqing, taking 'Yunyan 87' as a control, a comparative test of disease resistance was carried out with 4 tobacco varieties ('Yunyan 116' 'CF8704' 'NC102' and 'NC297'). In the field survey in Fengdu, Chongqing, 'NC102' and 'CF8704' had the strongest resistance to tobacco mosaic disease, 'NC297' had the strongest resistance to tobacco brown spot disease, and 'NC102' had the strongest resistance to tobacco wildfire disease. Indoor resistance evaluation of tobacco black shank and tobacco Corynespora leaf spot, which did not occur in the field showed that 'NC102' had the strongest resistance to tobacco black shank, and 'NC297' had the best resistance to tobacco Corynespora leaf spot. The results provide a reference basis for the introduction of excellent disease resistant tobacco varieties in Fengdu tobacco production region of Chongqing.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 张涵颖. 浅谈烟草税收的成本与效益[J]. 智富时代, 2018(9):12.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 陈瑞泰, 朱贤朝, 王智发, 等. 全国16个主产烟省(区)烟草侵染性病害调研报告[J]. 中国烟草科学, 1997, 18(4):1-7.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 季定根. 聚六亚甲基双胍盐酸盐防治细菌性病害应用研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2018.

    Google Scholar

    [4] REN X F, JI XX, QI W Z, et al. Evaluation of the Combination of Propamocarb Hydrochloride and Fluopicolide for Management of Black Shank on Tobacco[J]. Crop Protection, 2018, 114:12-17.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 韩腾. 枯草芽孢杆菌Tpb55菌株对黑胫病的防治效果、根际定殖规律及微生态效应[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2016.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 杨红武. 不同耕作制土壤和叶面微生物群落与三种烟草病害的关系[D]. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2018.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 林秋仙. 烟草除草剂药害和硼害诊断与除草剂残留检测[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2012.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 刘洪祥, 贾兴华, 王元英, 等. 烤烟新品种中烟98适应性及其烟叶品质与安全性的研究评价[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2002, 23(3):1-4.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 王红梅. 宁洱烟区烤烟后备品种筛选及其配套技术研究[D]. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2015.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 李超韩. 遵义烟区新品种筛选的研究[D]. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2015.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 第三次全国农作物种质资源普查与收集行动成效显著[J]. 科学种养, 2019(6):63-64.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 刘国祥, 李媛, 吕洪坤, 等. 重庆地区新收集烟草种质资源的鉴定评价与整理编目[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(4):896-907.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草品种-农业试验技术规程:YC/Z 527-2015[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2015.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 烟草病虫害分级及调查方法:GB/T 23222-2008[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2009.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 周昶进. 湘西烟区烤烟品种的引进与筛选[D]. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2016.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 杨照. 咸阳烟区特色优质烟草品种筛选试验初报[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2021, 52(7):32-37.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 杨利云, 李军营, 王丽特, 等. 光环境对烟草生长及物质代谢的影响研究进展[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2015, 34(5):1114-1128.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 逄涛, 林茜, 李勇, 等. 温度对烟草物质代谢的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(9):1939-1945.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 李盼盼, 李方明, 申国明, 等. 土壤有机质含量和酸碱度对烟草内生真菌生物多样性的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2018, 39(3):24-30.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 汤宏, 张杨珠, 李向阳, 等. 不同施氮量对烟草生长及产量的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2018(11):63-67.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 王佩. 普通烟草重要抗病基因的分子标记检测及其抗性鉴定[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2019.

    Google Scholar

    [22] HOLMES F O. Inheritance in Tobacco of an Improved Resistance to Infection by Tobacco Mosaic Virus[J]. Virology, 1960, 12(1):59-67.

    Google Scholar

    [23] BAO Y G, DING N, QIN Q L, et al. Genetic Mapping of the Ph Gene Conferring Disease Resistance to Black Shank in Tobacco[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2019, 39(9):1-10.

    Google Scholar

    [24] SHI R, HUBERT H, DEXTER-BOONE A, et al. Identification and Validation of SNP Markers Associated with Wz-Mediated Phytophthora Nicotianae Resistance in Nicotiana Tabacum L[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2019, 39(7):1-9.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 张玉. 烟草抗赤星病品种蛋白质组分析及NbMLP423基因功能研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2019.

    Google Scholar

    [26] 赵强. 烟草抗低温和抗赤星病相关基因的分子机理研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2018.

    Google Scholar

    [27] WEEKS W W, CHAPLIN J F, CAMPBELL C R. Capillary Chromatography:Evaluation of Volatiles from Flue-Cured Tobacco Varieties[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1989, 37(4):1038-1045.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 徐秀红. 烟草野火病的抗性鉴定及其抗性基因的分子标记与辅助选择[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2005.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(659) PDF downloads(397) Cited by(0)

Access History

Evaluation of Disease Resistance of Four Tobacco Varieties

Abstract: Chongqing is an important tobacco production area. In order to screen the excellent tobacco varieties suitable for production in Chongqing, taking 'Yunyan 87' as a control, a comparative test of disease resistance was carried out with 4 tobacco varieties ('Yunyan 116' 'CF8704' 'NC102' and 'NC297'). In the field survey in Fengdu, Chongqing, 'NC102' and 'CF8704' had the strongest resistance to tobacco mosaic disease, 'NC297' had the strongest resistance to tobacco brown spot disease, and 'NC102' had the strongest resistance to tobacco wildfire disease. Indoor resistance evaluation of tobacco black shank and tobacco Corynespora leaf spot, which did not occur in the field showed that 'NC102' had the strongest resistance to tobacco black shank, and 'NC297' had the best resistance to tobacco Corynespora leaf spot. The results provide a reference basis for the introduction of excellent disease resistant tobacco varieties in Fengdu tobacco production region of Chongqing.

Reference (28)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return