Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2022 Volume 1 Issue 6
Article Contents

WANG Xiaoyan, JIANG Long, HU Litao, et al. Effects of Several Plant Inducer Agents on Disease Resistance and Agronomic Traits of Tobacco[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (6): 78-88. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.06.009
Citation: WANG Xiaoyan, JIANG Long, HU Litao, et al. Effects of Several Plant Inducer Agents on Disease Resistance and Agronomic Traits of Tobacco[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (6): 78-88. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.06.009

Effects of Several Plant Inducer Agents on Disease Resistance and Agronomic Traits of Tobacco

More Information
  • Received Date: 02/09/2022
  • MSC: S572

  • In order to clarify the effects of plant inducer agents on common tobacco diseases, using variety “Yunyan 87” as the material, the effects of several kinds of plant inducer agents on the disease resistance and the agronomic traits of tobacco were investigated. The results showed that zinc sulfate and Haf total could improve the activity of resistance-related Superoxide Dismutase(SOD) enzyme in tobacco, and had better control effect on tobacco mosaic disease, wildfire disease and brown spot disease, also increased the height of tobacco plants. By comparing different application methods, it was found that foliar spraying had better effect on control of diseases and no significant effect on agronomic traits. With the application at different growth periods of tobacco, it was found that the application at rosette stage had a better prevention effect on tobacco diseases, and also had a certain growth-promoting effect on tobacco leaf width. This study provides a theoretical basis for tobacco disease control and improvement of tobacco agronomic characters.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 李秋潼. 重庆地区烟草农业存在的问题及解决对策[J]. 现代农业科技, 2009(12):198-199.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 袁维, 谭海文, 卢燕回, 等. 烟草侵染性病害种类变迁及其发生概况[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(4):165-167.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 陈海涛. 重庆市烟区主要烟草病害及综防技术[J]. 植物医生, 2007, 20(5):28-29.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 宋娟, 廖秋菊. 重庆烟草地区ELISA检测[J]. 生物技术世界, 2014, 11(1):173.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 何伟光. 重庆烟草病毒病毒源田间溯源与防控对策研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2020.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 周建国, 肖启明, 刘双清, 等. 烟草花叶病毒病发生及防治研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(1):121-122, 138.

    Google Scholar

    [7] DANGLJ L, JONESJ D G. Plant Pathogens and Integrated DefenceResponses to Infection[J]. Nature, 2001, 411(6839):826-833.

    Google Scholar

    [8] DURRANTW E, DONG X. Systemic Acquired Resistance[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2004, 42:185-209.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 杨献营. 烟草病害防治的新途径——诱导抗病性的研究进展[J]. 中国烟草, 1993, 14(3):29-31.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 邱德文. 植物免疫诱抗剂的研究进展与应用前景[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2014, 16(1):39-45.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 顾帅娣, 黄玉杰, 陈国平, 等. 氨基酸水溶肥对水稻产量及其构成因素的影响试验简报[J]. 上海农业科技, 2019(3):94, 97.

    Google Scholar

    [12] KATHIRESAN A, MIRANDA J, CHINNAPPA C C, et al. γ-AminobutyricAcid Promotes Stem Elongation in StellariaLongipes:The Role of Ethylene[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 1998, 26:131-137.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 马红敏. 硫酸锌对大豆生长发育及产量、品质的影响[D]. 大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2008.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 窦嘉恒. 施用硫酸镁对草莓植株生长发育及果实品质的影响[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2016.

    Google Scholar

    [15] CAI L, LIUC Y, FAN G J, et al. Preventing Viral Disease by ZnONPs through Directly Deactivating TMV and Activating Plant Immunity in NicotianaBenthamiana[J]. Environmental Science:Nano Journal, 2019, 6, 3653.

    Google Scholar

    [16] XIANG S Y, LVX, HE L H, et al. Dual-Action Pesticide Carrier That Continuously Induces Plant Resistance, Enhances Plant Anti-Tobacco Mosaic Virus Activity, and Promotes Plant Growth[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2019, 67(36):10000-10009.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 沈其荣, 朱毅勇, 谢学东, 等. Ca2+在磷酸盐营养诱导黄瓜幼叶系统抗病中的作用[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2000, 6(3):280-286, 360.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 马占峰, 黄建, 唐民, 等. 微量元素对烤烟化学品质的影响[J]. 江西农业, 2017(9):23-24.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 胡蓉花, 王俊, 沈雪婷, 等. 增施锌肥对烤烟品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(11):76-82.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 谢奎忠, 孙小花, 罗爱花, 等. 基施锌肥对长期连作马铃薯抗病性相关酶活性、土传病害和产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022(4):154-159.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 陶焱金, 井凌琨, 王琪, 等. 锌肥施用对我国小麦籽粒锌含量的影响[J/OL]. 农业资源与环境学报:1-10[2022-08-29].

    Google Scholar

    [22] 朱月兰, 杨柳. 不同用量锌肥对水稻产量的影响试验[J]. 农业技术与装备, 2021(5):22-23.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 孔凡明, 彭怀俊, 吴廷全, 等. 烟草花叶病药剂防治效果及其机理研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2001, 7(1):26-31.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 李洋. 不同追施钾肥的方法对烤烟产量和品质的影响[D]. 大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2014.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 董贤春, 秦铁伟, 刘兰明, 等. 不同药剂及施药方式对防治烟草赤星病效果的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(7):1630-1632.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(725) PDF downloads(255) Cited by(0)

Access History

Effects of Several Plant Inducer Agents on Disease Resistance and Agronomic Traits of Tobacco

Abstract: In order to clarify the effects of plant inducer agents on common tobacco diseases, using variety “Yunyan 87” as the material, the effects of several kinds of plant inducer agents on the disease resistance and the agronomic traits of tobacco were investigated. The results showed that zinc sulfate and Haf total could improve the activity of resistance-related Superoxide Dismutase(SOD) enzyme in tobacco, and had better control effect on tobacco mosaic disease, wildfire disease and brown spot disease, also increased the height of tobacco plants. By comparing different application methods, it was found that foliar spraying had better effect on control of diseases and no significant effect on agronomic traits. With the application at different growth periods of tobacco, it was found that the application at rosette stage had a better prevention effect on tobacco diseases, and also had a certain growth-promoting effect on tobacco leaf width. This study provides a theoretical basis for tobacco disease control and improvement of tobacco agronomic characters.

Reference (25)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return