Search Advanced

Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2022 Volume 1 Issue 2
Article Contents
Previous Article Next Article

GUI Zimeng, ZENG Qinghui, YANG Yu, et al. Toxicity of Seven Insecticides to Myzus persicae[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (2): 53-58. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.008
Citation: GUI Zimeng, ZENG Qinghui, YANG Yu, et al. Toxicity of Seven Insecticides to Myzus persicae[J]. PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2022, (2): 53-58. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.zwyx.2022.02.008
shu

Toxicity of Seven Insecticides to Myzus persicae

  • 1. College of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China;

  • 2. Provincial Key Laboratory for Agricultural Pest Management of Mountainous Regions/Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China;

  • 3. College of Tobacco Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China

More Information
  • Received Date: 13/01/2022

  • MSC: S482.3;S572

  • Myzus persicae is one of the main pests that harms tobacco. In order to search for high efficiency and low toxicity agents for the control of M. persicae, the toxicity of veratrine, imidacloprid, acetamiprid, thiamethoxam, pymetrozine, pyrethrin and dipropyl cycloester against M. persicae was compared by leaf-dip and immersion methods. The results showed that thiamethoxam and imidacloprid had relatively high toxicity to M. persicae with LC50 values of 2.220 mg/L and 2.619 mg/L, respectively, in leaf-dip treatment. In immersion treatment, the toxicity of imidacloprid and veratrol to M. persicae was relatively high with LC50 values of 1.203 mg/L and 2.554 mg/L, respectively. Imidacloprid showed high toxicity to M. persicae in two different treatments, which could be used as a recommended agent for the control of M. persicae in the field. The results can provide scientific reference for the effective control of aphid.
  • 加载中
  • [1] VAN EMDEN H F,EASTOP V F,HUGHES R D,et al.The Ecology of Myzus persicae[J].Annual Review of Entomology,1969,14:197-270.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 赵冲,王秀芳,陈丹,等.不同地理种群烟蚜形态特征差异分析[J].昆虫学报,2013,56(12):1452-1463.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 陈家骅,韩书友,张玉珍.烟蚜Myzus persicae种群动态的模糊聚类分析[J].河南农业大学学报,1990,24(4):428-435.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 刘金燕,汤朝起,董勇浩,等.烟蚜对不同寄主植物间的选择性分析[J].烟草科技,2018,51(7):36-39.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 邱睿,李淑君,王海涛,等.不同烟草品种上烟蚜的繁殖特征分析[J].烟草科技,2018,51(1):15-20.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 袁锋,冯纪年,李茂辉.烟蚜为害的经济损失研究[J].昆虫学报,1994,37(4):440-445.

    Google Scholar

    [7] WEI J N,LI T F,KUANG R P,et al.Mass Rearing of Aphidius Gifuensis (Hymenoptera:Aphidiidae) for Biological Control of Myzus persicae (Homoptera:Aphididae)[J].Biocontrol Science and Technology,2003,13(1):87-97.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 任广伟,张连涛.烟蚜和烟青虫的发生与防治[J].烟草科技,2002,35(5):43-45.

    Google Scholar

    [9] RAMSEY J S,WILSON A C C,DE VOS M,et al.Genomic Resources for Myzus persicae:EST Sequencing,SNP Identification,and Microarray Design[J].BMC Genomics,2007,8:423.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 何应琴,吴佳星,唐元满,等.黄瓜花叶病毒和马铃薯Y病毒混合侵染烟株对烟蚜取食行为的影响[J].植物保护学报,2017,44(1):32-38.

    Google Scholar

    [11] CHENG Y J,LI Z X.Both Farnesyl Diphosphate Synthase Genes are Involved in the Production of Alarm Pheromone in the Green Peach Aphid Myzus persicae[J].Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology,2019,100(3):e21530.

    Google Scholar

    [12] SRIGIRIRAJU L,SEMTNER P J,BLOOMQUIST J R.Monitoring for Imidacloprid Resistance in the Tobacco-Adapted Form of the Green Peach Aphid,Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera:Aphididae),in the Eastern United States[J].Pest Management Science,2010,66(6):676-685.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 覃飞跃,陈雷,杨友才.不同药剂防治烟蚜效果研究[J].现代农业科技,2014(23):146,148.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 吴天星.烟蚜综合防治策略研究进展[J].安徽农学通报,2014,20(20):59-60,65.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 谭海军.新型生物源杀虫剂双丙环虫酯[J].世界农药,2019,41(2):61-64.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 容宽.百色烟区主要病虫害发生消长动态及主要害虫药剂防治试验 [D].南宁:广西大学,2018.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 李敏,赵会君,屈欢,等.新烟碱类杀虫剂潜在环境风险及光降解行为研究进展[J].农药,2019,58(3):170-173.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 胡卫东,周向平,黄石旺,等.7种杀虫剂防治烟蚜药效研究[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(18):8574-8575.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 陈杰,付继刚,杨天沛,等.我国烟蚜防治研究进展[J].作物杂志,2015(6):21-26.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 丁汉东,史新涛,李敏.25%噻虫嗪水分散粒剂防治烟草蚜虫药效试验[J].湖北植保,2015(6):8-9.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 蒲小明,陈永明,沈会芳,等.广东省烟区主要虫害化学防治现状与控制技术研究[J].广东农业科学,2016,43(10):100-105.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 熊辉,陈宾.25%吡蚜酮可湿性粉剂防治桃蚜田间药效试验[J].现代园艺,2016(13):154.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 王永,王秀芳,李长武,等.2.5%除虫菊素乳油防治烟蚜田间药效试验[J].现代农药,2005,4(5):43-44.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 中华人民共和国农业部.农药室内生物测定试验准则杀虫剂第14部分:浸叶法:NY/T 1154.14—2008 [S].北京:中国农业出版社,2008.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 中华人民共和国农业部.农药室内生物测定试验准则杀虫剂第5部分:杀卵活性试验浸渍法:NY/T 1154.5—2006 [S].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.

    Google Scholar

    [26] BUSVINE J R.Recommended Methods for Measurement of Pest Resistance to Pesticides[M].Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,1980:25-28.

    Google Scholar

    [27] 张志祥,徐汉虹,程东美.EXCEL在毒力回归计算中的应用[J].昆虫知识,2002,39(1):67-70.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 武怀恒,万鹏,黄民松.毒力回归计算方法及相应软件使用介绍[J].安徽农业科学,2014,42(27):9335-9338,9340.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 梁巧丽,陆永跃,梁广文.应用3种方法评价4种新氯化烟碱类杀虫剂对棉花粉蚧的毒力[J].华南农业大学学报,2014,35(4):61-66.

    Google Scholar

    [30] 李创创,袁雷,张福莉,等.5种新型杀虫剂对烟蚜的毒力测定[J].植物医生,2013,26(4):28-31.

    Google Scholar

    [31] 白婷婷,刘文涛,毛晓红,等.几种内吸药剂对烟蚜的室内毒力及田间防效[J].山东农业科学,2019,51(4):128-131.

    Google Scholar

    [32] 张雪梅,陈雁君,谷昊明,等.吡虫啉对生菜多酚氧化酶活性的影响[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2008,18(3):549-550.

    Google Scholar

    [33] 丁佩,马海芹,戴德江,等.70%吡虫啉WDG防治杭白菊蚜虫应用技术研究[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(17):95-99.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 吴旭海.10%吡虫啉可湿性粉剂药效试验报告[J].基层农技推广,2016,4(10):36-37.

    Google Scholar

    [35] 韩文清,尹蓉,秦一凡.几种杀虫剂防治大豆蚜虫对比试验[J].农业开发与装备,2018(12):131-132.

    Google Scholar

    [36] 孙颖,王向阳.植物保护技术手册 [M].太原:山西经济出版社,2017.

    Google Scholar

    [37] 张夏亭,聂秋林,高欣.除虫菊素的杀虫特性与作用机理[J].农药科学与管理,2003,24(2):22-23.

    Google Scholar

    [38] 王巍,洪晓燕,张万民.北方农药新品种实用手册 [M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2019.

    Google Scholar

    [39] BASS C,PUINEAN A M,ZIMMER C T,et al.The Evolution of Insecticide Resistance in the Peach Potato Aphid,Myzus persicae[J].Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,2014,51:41-51.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(1035) PDF downloads(857) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Toxicity of Seven Insecticides to Myzus persicae

  • Received Date: 13/01/2022

Abstract: Myzus persicae is one of the main pests that harms tobacco. In order to search for high efficiency and low toxicity agents for the control of M. persicae, the toxicity of veratrine, imidacloprid, acetamiprid, thiamethoxam, pymetrozine, pyrethrin and dipropyl cycloester against M. persicae was compared by leaf-dip and immersion methods. The results showed that thiamethoxam and imidacloprid had relatively high toxicity to M. persicae with LC50 values of 2.220 mg/L and 2.619 mg/L, respectively, in leaf-dip treatment. In immersion treatment, the toxicity of imidacloprid and veratrol to M. persicae was relatively high with LC50 values of 1.203 mg/L and 2.554 mg/L, respectively. Imidacloprid showed high toxicity to M. persicae in two different treatments, which could be used as a recommended agent for the control of M. persicae in the field. The results can provide scientific reference for the effective control of aphid.

    HTML

Reference (39)

Catalog

    Copyright PLANT HEALTH AND MEDICINE

    Address：Journal Press of Southwest University, Beibei District, Chongqing Tel：023-68250657 E-mail：zhiwuyixue@sina.com

    Supported by:Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return