Message Board

Dear readers, authors and reviewers,you can add a message on this page. We will reply to you as soon as possible!

2020 Volume 42 Issue 5
Article Contents

Ming GAO, Li LI, Bai-shu LI, et al. Efficacy of Low-Temperature Phosphine Fumigation for Killing Planococcus lilacius Cockerell and Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley in Imported Mangosteen Fruit and Its Effect on Fruit Quality[J]. Journal of Southwest University Natural Science Edition, 2020, 42(5): 57-62. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2020.05.008
Citation: Ming GAO, Li LI, Bai-shu LI, et al. Efficacy of Low-Temperature Phosphine Fumigation for Killing Planococcus lilacius Cockerell and Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley in Imported Mangosteen Fruit and Its Effect on Fruit Quality[J]. Journal of Southwest University Natural Science Edition, 2020, 42(5): 57-62. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2020.05.008

Efficacy of Low-Temperature Phosphine Fumigation for Killing Planococcus lilacius Cockerell and Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley in Imported Mangosteen Fruit and Its Effect on Fruit Quality

More Information
  • Corresponding authors: Li-xiang ZHANG ;  Tao LIU
  • Received Date: 07/03/2019
    Available Online: 20/05/2020
  • MSC: S412

  • In this study, the effects of low-temperature phosphine fumigation on the survival of Planococcus lilacius Cockerell and Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley and on the postharvest quality of imported mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) were investigated. Insects of mixed life stages and mangosteen fruit were treated with phosphine at 0.28, 0.59, 1.14 and 2.28 g/m3 for 4 h at 5 ℃, then the mortality of the insects and the fruit quality parameters including sugar, acidity, Vc, total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) were measured. Toxicity test results showed that P. lilacius and D. neobrevipes female adults were more tolerant than their nymphs, and 0.59 g/m3 phosphine was enough to achieve 100% mortality for all life stages. Fruit quality test showed that there were few changes in soluble solids, slight decrease in titratable acidity, Vc and T-AOC value, and dramatic increase in PPO activity of the stored fruit. In the meanwhile, none of adverse effects on fruit quality were detected in all fumigated groups compared with the control group. In conclusion, the above results indicate that low-temperature phosphine fumigation can be used for the postharvest control of P. lilacinus and D. neobrevipes on mangosteen fruit, and fumigation with 0.59 g/m3 phosphine for 4 h at 5 ℃ can be used as an alternative treatment schedule.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 杨连珍.山竹子[J].热带农业科学, 2002, 22(4):60-66, 71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2196.2002.04.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] 刘全儒, 于明.几种热带果实的食用部位[J].生物学通报, 2003, 38(1):10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0006-3193.2003.01.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] 奚国华, 陈展册, 卢炜, 等.广西局从进境旅客携带山竹上首次截获山竹簇粉蚧[J].植物检疫, 2013, 27(4):92-93.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 徐梅, 黄蓬英, 安榆林, 等.检疫性有害生物——南洋臀纹粉蚧[J].植物检疫, 2008, 22(2):100-102, 141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2755.2008.02.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] 顾渝娟, 刘海军, 何日荣, 等.东盟输华水果携带检疫性蚧类害虫疫情分析[J].植物检疫, 2013, 27(5):95-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2755.2013.05.023

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] 胡钟予.新菠萝灰粉蚧生物学和生态学特性研究[D].杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2017.http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10341-1017253962.htm

    Google Scholar

    [7] NGUYEN T K, VO T K L, NGUYEN T L, et al.Phytosanitary Irradiation of the Mealybugs, Dysmicoccus Neobrevipes, Planococcus lilacinus, and Planococcus minor (Hemiptera:Pseudococcidae), Infesting Dragon Fruit in Viet Nam[J].Florida Entomologist, 2016, 99(6):159-165.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 齐国君, 陈婷, 高燕, 等.基于Maxent的大洋臀纹粉蚧和南洋臀纹粉蚧在中国的适生区分析[J].环境昆虫学报, 2015, 37(2):219-223.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 覃振强, 吴建辉, 任顺祥, 等.外来入侵害虫新菠萝灰粉蚧在中国的风险性分析[J].中国农业科学, 2010, 43(3):626-631. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.03.025

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] PAUZIAH M, ABDULLAH H, MOHAMMED M S, et al.Effect of Methyl Bromide Fumigation on Quality of 'josapine' and 'n36' Pineapples[J].Acta Horticulturae, 2011(902):437-441.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 刘涛, 李丽, 张凡华, 等.低温磷化氢熏蒸对木瓜实蝇的毒力研究[J].植物检疫, 2013, 27(6):56-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2755.2013.06.009

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] 刘涛, 张凡华, 李丽, 等.脐橙携带桔小实蝇低温磷化氢检疫熏蒸技术研究[J].植物检疫, 2012, 26(6):1-4.

    Google Scholar

    [13] ZHANG F H, WANG Y J, LIU T, et al.Effects of Low Temperature Phosphine Fumigation on Postharvest Quality of White Chrysanthemum 'Dabaiju'[J].Scientia Horticulturae, 2012, 142:92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.05.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] LIU Y B.Low Temperature Phosphine Fumigation for Postharvest Control of Western Flower Thrips (Thysanoptera:Thripidae) on Lettuce, Broccoli, Asparagus, and Strawberry[J].Journal of Economic Entomology, 2008, 101(6):1786-1791. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-101.6.1786

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] LIU T, LI L, ZHANG F H, et al.Effect of Low-Temperature Phosphine Fumigation on the Survival of Bactrocera correcta (Diptera:Tephritidae)[J].Journal of Economic Entomology, 2015, 108(4):1624-1629. doi: 10.1093/jee/tov150

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] 张凡华, 刘波, 王跃进.不同温度下磷化氢熏蒸对红富士苹果品质的影响[J].食品工业科技, 2010, 31(12):306-308, 312.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.溴甲烷检疫熏蒸库技术规范: GB/T 31752-2015[S].北京: 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2015.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 王迪.枇杷携带桔小实蝇磷化氢低温熏蒸技术研究[D].福州: 福建农林大学, 2014.http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=D583589

    Google Scholar

    [19] 刘波, 詹国平, 任荔荔, 等.纯磷化氢熏蒸对桃小食心虫的毒力作用[J].植物保护, 2016, 42(6):191-196.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 高明, 李丽, 邹海洋, 等.磷化氢低温熏蒸对出口油桃品质的影响[J].植物检疫, 2018, 32(1):70-74.

    Google Scholar

    [21] AKAMINE E K.Preventing the Darkening of Fresh Lychess Prepared for Export.Technical Programme Report[J].University of Hawaii, 1960, 127:17-21.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 吴振先, 苏美霞, 陈维信, 等.贮藏荔枝果皮多酚氧化酶及过氧化物酶与褐变的研究[J].华南农业大学学报, 1998, 19(1):12-15.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(1343) PDF downloads(369) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Efficacy of Low-Temperature Phosphine Fumigation for Killing Planococcus lilacius Cockerell and Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley in Imported Mangosteen Fruit and Its Effect on Fruit Quality

    Corresponding author: Li-xiang ZHANG ; 
    Corresponding authors: Tao LIU

Abstract: In this study, the effects of low-temperature phosphine fumigation on the survival of Planococcus lilacius Cockerell and Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley and on the postharvest quality of imported mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) were investigated. Insects of mixed life stages and mangosteen fruit were treated with phosphine at 0.28, 0.59, 1.14 and 2.28 g/m3 for 4 h at 5 ℃, then the mortality of the insects and the fruit quality parameters including sugar, acidity, Vc, total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) were measured. Toxicity test results showed that P. lilacius and D. neobrevipes female adults were more tolerant than their nymphs, and 0.59 g/m3 phosphine was enough to achieve 100% mortality for all life stages. Fruit quality test showed that there were few changes in soluble solids, slight decrease in titratable acidity, Vc and T-AOC value, and dramatic increase in PPO activity of the stored fruit. In the meanwhile, none of adverse effects on fruit quality were detected in all fumigated groups compared with the control group. In conclusion, the above results indicate that low-temperature phosphine fumigation can be used for the postharvest control of P. lilacinus and D. neobrevipes on mangosteen fruit, and fumigation with 0.59 g/m3 phosphine for 4 h at 5 ℃ can be used as an alternative treatment schedule.

  • 山竹(Garcinia mangostana L.)是藤黄科山竹子属植物,果实味道可口,营养丰富,深受人们喜爱,是我国从东南亚进口的主要水果之一[1-2].由于果柄和果蒂处较为隐蔽,山竹极易携带粉蚧类有害生物.随着我国进口东南亚水果量的增大,截获的检疫性有害生物持续增多.近年来,深圳、广东、广西、江苏、浙江和上海口岸多次从进口山竹和输华农产品中截获南洋臀纹粉蚧和新菠萝灰粉蚧[3-4].据统计,近5年来,我国从进口植物和植物产品中截获检疫性蚧类害虫12种,共检测到7 000多次;其中南洋臀纹粉蚧和新菠萝灰粉蚧占截获量的60%左右[5].

    新菠萝灰粉蚧和南洋臀纹粉蚧属于昆虫纲(Insecta)、半翅目(Hemiptera)、粉蚧科(Pseudococcidae),是检疫性有害生物.南洋臀纹粉蚧主要分布在亚洲热带地区及大洋洲;新菠萝灰粉蚧主要分布在美洲地区,在亚洲和大洋洲也有分布[4-6].这2种粉蚧寄主都十分广泛,可为害菠萝、南瓜、山竹、龙眼和可可等农林经济作物,会导致幼果脱落,还会分泌蜜露吸附灰尘,使叶片和果实发黑从而影响商业品质,是热带、亚热带经济作物的重要害虫[6-7].齐国君等[8]和覃振强等[9]对南洋臀纹粉蚧、新菠萝灰粉蚧适生区的分析表明,新菠萝灰粉蚧和南洋臀纹粉蚧在我国长江流域以南的广大区域适生,分别占全国总面积的18.17%和13.03%,一旦入侵,危害巨大.为保障水果进出口贸易和防范外来有害生物入侵,对进境山竹携带的2种粉蚧实施检疫处理显得十分必要.

    溴甲烷熏蒸处理技术作为最经济有效防止外来生物入侵的手段之一,已经被各国使用多年.但是,由于溴甲烷会对地球臭氧层造成破坏,被列入受控物质名单,未来会被逐渐淘汰,因此,必须研究溴甲烷替代熏蒸技术[10].磷化氢低温熏蒸是国际植物保护公约组织推荐的新型处理技术,可以在水果冷藏温度下实施,在鲜活产品的检疫处理中应用前景广阔[11].前期研究表明,在-1.5~15 ℃条件下,磷化氢可成功用于处理苹果、油桃、桃、柠檬和杧果等水果及花卉中携带的粉蚧、苹果蠹蛾、地中海实蝇、桔小实蝇、蓟马等有害生物的熏蒸处理,说明磷化氢对于水果有害生物的熏蒸处理具有较好前景[12-15].为此,本文研究磷化氢熏蒸对南洋臀纹粉蚧和新菠萝灰粉蚧的杀灭效果以及对山竹品质的影响,为在检疫处理过程中使用磷化氢熏蒸山竹提供依据.

1.   材料与方法
  • 购买泰国进口山竹,挑选果形端正、大小和成熟度均匀、无机械损伤的果实备用.

    南洋臀纹粉蚧及新菠萝灰粉蚧从深圳口岸采集.在实验室恒温培养箱内用南瓜饲养,在温度(26±1) ℃,湿度(60±10)%,光周期14L:10D饲养条件下,使其发育、繁殖,建立实验种群.

  • 磷化氢(PH3)标准气(1.02%)购自北京北氧特种气体研究所;气相色谱仪:安捷伦6890N,美国安捷伦公司生产;糖度计:Pocket PAL-1日本爱拓;酸度计:GMK-708,韩国G-WON公司生产;紫外分光光度计:U-3310,日本日立公司生产;高速冷冻离心机:5417R,德国Eppendorf公司生产.

  • 取180个山竹分为5组,每组36个,用于熏蒸处理和后续的品质检测.分别选取南洋臀纹粉蚧和新菠萝灰粉蚧混合虫态的南瓜,确保每个南瓜上的成虫和若虫数都在50头以上.将山竹果实和南瓜同时放入熏蒸罐中,分别用0.28,0.59,1.14和2.28 g/m3浓度的磷化氢在5 ℃下熏蒸4 h,同时设置对照组.

    整个熏蒸过程使用改造的6 L熏蒸罐进行,具体熏蒸程序参照刘涛等[12]的方法.每罐装有12个山竹果实和带有不同粉蚧的南瓜各1个,装载率约为35%.熏蒸罐先在5 ℃恒温箱中平衡12 h,待温度平衡后塞紧塞子,使用气密性注射器将磷化氢纯气定量注入到熏蒸罐中开始熏蒸.熏蒸开始后,每10 min进行一次浓度检测,在熏蒸结束前再进行一次浓度检测.磷化氢浓度检测使用气相色谱仪(6890N,安捷伦)进行[15];检测条件为:进样口温度120 ℃,填充色谱柱Propark Q(80~100目)的柱温为70 ℃,TCD为200 ℃,载气为H2,柱流量为25 mL/min,参比气流量为30 mL/min.熏蒸4 h后进行散气,散气2 h后将南瓜做好标记放入培养箱中,48 h后用软毛刷将粉蚧从南瓜表面刷下,用针轻刺粉蚧表面看其是否有反应,由此计算粉蚧死亡率.将山竹放入5 ℃恒温箱继续贮存,以备后续的品质检测.每个处理重复3次.

  • 熏蒸处理后的山竹在5 ℃条件下储藏14 d,每组每隔7 d拿出9个果实进行品质检测.

    视觉品质评价.每组拿出9个山竹,通过肉眼对果蒂、果柄、果壳及果肉的色泽等进行观察,各组间进行观察对比.

    可溶性糖和酸度.山竹果实糖和酸的测定参照张凡华等[16]的方法,果实去皮、核,取果肉,压榨成汁,取纯果汁用糖度计测量其糖度.取纯果汁0.3 mL,用30 mL蒸馏水稀释后,用酸度计测量其酸度.每个果实重复测定3次,取平均值.

    抗坏血酸(Vc).果实抗坏血酸(Vc)使用南京建成生物工程研究所提供的“抗坏血酸(Vc)测定试剂盒(货号:A009)”,按照试剂盒说明书进行测定.

    总抗氧化能力(T-AOC).果实总抗氧化能力(T-AOC)使用南京建成生物工程研究所提供的“总抗氧化能力试剂盒(货号:A015)”,按照说明书进行测定.

    多酚氧化酶(PPO).果实多酚氧化酶(PPO)使用南京建成生物工程研究所提供的“多酚氧化酶(货号:A136)”,按照说明书进行测定.

  • 应用EXCEL 2010统计软件整理相关数据,用SPSS 19.0版本DUNCAN检验法对相关指标进行统计学分析.

2.   结果与分析
  • 试验结果看出,熏蒸过程中磷化氢的浓度有所下降,说明在整个熏蒸过程中山竹对磷化氢有一定的吸附作用,平均吸附率约为20%左右.当熏蒸CT值为1.06 g/(m3·h)时,南洋臀纹粉蚧和新菠萝灰粉蚧的雌成虫死亡率分别为98.87%,99.27%,若虫死亡率均为100%,说明2种粉蚧的雌成虫较若虫对磷化氢更为耐受.而当CT值达到2.12 g/(m3·h)或以上时,2种粉蚧所有虫态死亡率均为100%(表 1).

  • 熏蒸处理14 d后每组拿出9个山竹,对各组山竹果实的果蒂、果柄、果壳及果肉的色泽等进行对比观察.结果表明,磷化氢熏蒸处理组的果蒂和果柄均保持较为新鲜的绿色,果肉保持乳白色,无灼伤和变色,与对照组比较果实外观并无肉眼可见的显著差别,说明磷化氢熏蒸对山竹果实外观无明显影响.

  • 试验结果看出,在整个贮藏期间,各处理组的可溶性糖总体无明显的变化,呈较为平稳的趋势;而随着贮藏时间的延长各组的酸度有小幅度的降低;山竹Vc的质量分数也在整个贮藏期间有略微的降低.对山竹可溶性糖、酸度和Vc的检测结果进行统计分析,结果表明,除处理后14 d酸的变化外,其他所有处理组与对照组之间差异均无统计学意义.说明磷化氢熏蒸处理对山竹的糖、酸和Vc无明显影响(表 2).

  • 在整个贮藏期间山竹总抗氧化能力有小幅度的下降,这与山竹Vc质量分数也有所下降相一致,说明随着贮藏时间的延长山竹抗氧化能力会逐渐下降.贮藏期间山竹多酚氧化酶的活性有一定上升的趋势,多酚氧化酶活性提高与果肉褐变相关,这与山竹随储藏时间增加果肉逐渐变褐一致.同样,总抗氧化能力和多酚氧化酶虽整体都有变化,但通过数据统计分析进行比较,处理组和对照组总体趋势保持一致,差异没有统计学意义.说明磷化氢熏蒸对山竹抗氧化能力和多酚氧化酶并无明显影响,不会对山竹多酚氧化酶的活性和果肉褐变产生较大影响(表 3).

3.   讨论和结论
  • 热带和亚热带水果通常储存期较短,一般采取冷藏运输,而现有的熏蒸剂常为溴甲烷,在熏蒸的时候需要升温到10 ℃左右进行熏蒸,然后再恢复冷藏,这种反复的温度变化会对水果的品质造成不利的影响[17].而以往的研究表明,在低温状态下磷化氢熏蒸可快速有效地处理实蝇且有一定的增效作用,并对水果品质无明显影响[18].因此本研究选用磷化氢在低温条件下处理山竹上携带的南洋臀纹粉蚧和新菠萝灰粉蚧.刘波等[19]在使用磷化氢熏蒸桃小食心虫时发现5龄老熟幼虫最为耐受.刘涛等[12]在低温熏蒸脐橙携带的桔小实蝇时也发现,幼虫阶段的3龄幼虫耐受性高于其他虫态.本文研究结果表明,2种粉蚧的成虫对磷化氢的耐受性比若虫要高,这与已有的磷化氢熏蒸杀灭有害生物的研究报道相一致.处理桃小食心虫和桔小实蝇时熏蒸时间往往要在100 h以上,而本研究只熏蒸了4 h就能将2种粉蚧全部杀死,说明与其他有害生物相比,南洋臀纹粉蚧和新菠萝灰粉蚧对磷化氢更为敏感.

    张凡华[16]等研究表明,5 ℃下磷化氢熏蒸苹果11 d对苹果糖、酸等内部品质无影响;0 ℃下磷化氢熏蒸香梨和脐橙8 d就对硬度产生了影响,而对其他内部品质无影响.而磷化氢在低温下熏蒸油桃时,也表明对油桃品质无影响且还有助于维持熏蒸后油桃货架期的品质[20].一般在评价熏蒸剂对水果品质的影响时,会测定糖、酸等一系列常规指标.山竹被誉为“果中皇后”,其营养价值和商业价值较高,所以本研究在测定品质时还加入了Vc、抗氧化能力等指标.本文结果表明,熏蒸后山竹果肉可溶性糖总体保持一致,酸度、Vc质量分数和总抗氧化能力总体略微下降,多酚氧化酶则总体有上升趋势;但是处理组与对照组之间差异没有统计学意义.因此可以说明,在5 ℃下用磷化氢熏蒸山竹4 h,对山竹品质并无明显影响.水果贮藏时间过长可能会导致果肉褐变,这与果肉内多酚氧化酶的含量有关.多酚氧化酶会作用于花色素苷生成一种“类黑精”的物质,从而使果实发生褐变[21].吴振先等[22]研究表明,在贮藏过程中,由于多酚氧化酶同工酶的活性发生改变,多酚氧化酶的活性均会随贮藏期延长而逐渐增加.这与本试验在熏蒸后山竹果实多酚氧化酶活性整体升高相一致,说明多酚氧化酶的升高可能与山竹贮藏时间延长有关.

    本试验研究结果表明,在5 ℃条件下,0.59 g/m3磷化氢熏蒸处理山竹4 h,即可完全杀灭各虫态南洋臀纹粉蚧和新菠萝灰粉蚧,且对山竹的品质无明显影响,表明磷化氢可以用于山竹的检疫熏蒸处理.对于2种粉蚧更为精确的毒力试验则需要后续继续开展研究,并且开展相应商业化试验,最终确定进口山竹低温磷化氢熏蒸技术指标.

Table (3) Reference (22)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return